In my neck of the woods I'm just as likely (or even more likely) to face a threat from a four-legged attacker than I am from a two-legged attacker. Given the same caliber, would a FMJ/cast round be more effective gainst animals than HP ammo?
Lehigh Valley, PA. When I venture into town (which is less than a 10 minute drive away), I'm loaded up with HP's but my backyard (and sideyard) boarders about 40-50 acres of wooded area. Seen foxes and coyotes. Heard wolves (or, maybe distant neighbor dogs) howling and my neighbor across the field claims to have seen a bear on his property.whm1974 said:which four-legged is most likly to be a threat/problem where you are at?
Just curious what I would be better off with loaded in my CCW when I'm on or around my property.whm1974 said:Are you plan on using a rifle or handgun(or both)?
That's what I hear. Haven't yet seen one myself to either confirm or deny it.J. Parker said:You don't want a hollowpoint to stop after 10 or 12 inches when you shoot a 300 pound blackie. Aren't the black bears pretty good size in PA?
When I venture into the woods, I bring bear spray and my 686+ but when I'm in my backyard, I'm usually just armed with my SP101.J. Parker said:A 9mm pistol has no business in the woods.......only 357 mag/40cal or above........FMJ/hardcast/softpoint ammo only........quality, proven, recommended "bear spray" is handy
Since when is the anatomy of a four-legged animal so fundamentally different from a human that all ideas of HP being appropriate for stopping a threat go out the window?
A small hole through the lung is better than a cracked shoulder.It seems to me that an animal is less likely to be stopped by a FMJ round because it tends to go right through the animal and they may not know they've even been hit and will keep charging at you.
we don’t say use fmj on critters for hunting,
My feelings are if it’s a good bullet construction for soft tissue, it doesn’t matter what you’re shooting.