you can't change your skin color
Tell that to Michael Jackson.
you can't change your skin color
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
So, if I'm a homeowner with little children running all about, I cannot keep anyone, such as a meter reader, maintenance person or delivery person who is armed from my property?The only time property rights are mentioned in the constitution is in the fifth amendment (repeated by the fourteenth):
So, if I'm a homeowner with little children running all about, I cannot keep anyone, such as a meter reader, maintenance person or delivery person who is armed from my property?
If I am a business owner, I cannot establish an operating policy on my property that would prohibit employees from carrying a gun when serving my customers? Even when my customers would object and refuse to enter my business because of it?
that is not a valid argument... you can't change your skin color, carrying a weapon is a CHOICE
1st carrying concealed is not a right. Let me say that again, carrying concealed is not a right.
In the US you have a choice on rather or not you choose to express your rights. No one is forcing you to put a gun on in the morning, that is a choice you make. Just as this guy has a choice on rather he works for the mouse or not, he also has a choice about where he parks his car. He does not have to park it on his employers property.
1st carrying concealed is not a right. Let me say that again, carrying concealed is not a right.
3. Any vehicle used by an employee to come to or leave Company property, wherever located, is subject to search.
4. An employee’s refusal to permit a search pursuant to this policy is grounds for discipline, not excluding termination.
on this specific case, he shoulda let them search his car, I agree
because by refusing search, he is opening himself to getting fired, could be admitting guilt in any number of infractions, drugs, theft, etc etc,
A search of a private motor vehicle in the parking lot of a public or private employer to ascertain the presence of a firearm within the vehicle may only be conducted by on-duty law enforcement personnel, based upon due process and must comply with constitutional protections.
because by refusing search, he is opening himself to getting fired
could be admitting guilt in any number of infractions, drugs, theft, etc etc,
that's why Disney had the sheriff on hand:
k_dawg said:You know.. if Disney wishes to claim the entire property is engaged in the business of explosives.. wouldn't then all the regulations of OSHA/etc apply to everywhere?