MisterMike
Member
I ride motorcycles and always wear a helmet. It seems to me like the prudent thing. However, the overall level of fatalities among helmet-wearing and non-helmet-wearing motorcyclists is remarkably similar (depending, of course, on whose statistics you believe).
I've had discussions with folks who don't wear helmets about this topic, and occasionally the concept of risk compensation is brought up. Risk compensation is a theory occasionally discussed by sociologists and safety gurus to explain statistics like this--the basic idea is that the wearing of helmets or other safety gear causes bikers to feel more invincible, thus taking greater risks in their riding behavior. Overall, the benefits of enhanced safety gear end up being balanced by the greater risks that people take because they feel safer.
Does this apply to CCW? Do you take risks you otherwise might not take--like walking the dog late at night--because you have a weapon available? Is this a good thing, or a bad thing?
I've had discussions with folks who don't wear helmets about this topic, and occasionally the concept of risk compensation is brought up. Risk compensation is a theory occasionally discussed by sociologists and safety gurus to explain statistics like this--the basic idea is that the wearing of helmets or other safety gear causes bikers to feel more invincible, thus taking greater risks in their riding behavior. Overall, the benefits of enhanced safety gear end up being balanced by the greater risks that people take because they feel safer.
Does this apply to CCW? Do you take risks you otherwise might not take--like walking the dog late at night--because you have a weapon available? Is this a good thing, or a bad thing?
Last edited: