Do you get tired of a gun due to recoil, ammo cost or accuracy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
9,405
Location
The Mid-South.
Let's exclude having a duplicate or trio of the same. Many Mini 14 or 30 owners sold the older-model guns in past years due to accuracy, or just aftermarket mag issues (20-rd. factory mags available now for both).

Having seen so many CETME 'G-3's on "GB" etc, am aware of one reason for selling some of those. We had three at the show last week, with three FALs.
It appears that other than high ammo costs (.308/30-06 etc) with guys who do Not reload, accuracy might be the most basic common denominator.
 
Last edited:
I've gotten rid of rifle's for a myriad of reasons, from being boringly accurate to laughably inaccurate, to being heavy to hard on brass and even burning too much powder
 
I think a lot depends on what you bought the arm for in the first place. Wants, needs and expectations change over time.
 
I got tired of dealing with my 188-series Mini's accuracy issues, and finally sold it. I would have kept it anyway (it was still a fun little carbine) but couldn't afford to keep it AND save my pennies for something better, so I sold it on consignment and set the money aside for something more accurate.

Other than that, I've never really sold anything because of being tired of it. I've sold a couple of guns over the years due to tight finances, though.
 
I say a combo of things, leading to one overall cause; boredom.
And then we start to convince ourselves of the end all - be all rifle or caliber we really need, so we have to sell such and so rifle or two, to get this other.
 
If I (one day) were to acquire any decent shooting skills, still can't imagine being bored with any rifle.

Destroying a floating target, sometimes with one shot at 30-40 yards (SKS, "Jungle Carbine") or those on a river bank never seems to get old, but this hobby developed late in life. I envy you guys.
 
"...seen so many CETME 'G-3's on "GB" etc..." That's because they came from Century's monkey builders. Ditto for any FAL from Century.
"...tired of a gun due to recoil, ammo cost or accuracy?..." Nope. Just don't shoot 'em much. Both of my Lee-Enfields pound me due to the narrow butt stock, but they're not going anywhere.
"...Mini 14 or 30..." Grossly inaccurate for the money demanded, but fun to shoot. Wouldn't spend the money for one though. My Plainfield M1 Carbine will shoot circles around either.
"...guys who do not reload..." Should stick with a .22 instead of whining about the cost of ammo.
 
I would never sell a gun due to recoil, there are plenty I won't buy because of it.

Being a reloader ammo cost is a non-issue.

Accuracy is everything for me and I will not tolerate inaccurate guns. I understand the limitations of certain designs and realize that a lever action carbine is no benchrest rifle. I will always check the basics to make sure the problem is not something simple like a dinged crown or bad bedding. I have sold off more than a few rifles that just did not make the grade.

But what I really get tired of is having to sell a good rifle to cover a financial situation.
 
A family member and I both bought brand new 220 Swift rifles. I bought the dies, a bunch of diffferent bullets, powders, etc.

With both rifles, I tried working up an accurate load, and off the bench with Leupold 3-9 Vari-X-III Scopes, the smallest groups I could possibly pull were about 3" in size!

After wasting about a week, working at it every day, all day, going to the range and back, etc and trying about 20 different loads, we decided to sell the 220 Swifts and get 22-250's and have both been happy since!
 
I sold my HK because I paid $240 new and got $1000. Please don't ignore the market prices have a large influence on retaining a marginal (to that owner) firearm. Not everyone can afford the care and feeding of an arsenal of firearms, so the ones that typically fall into disuse will be sold for a variety of reasons, especially when the perceived value skyrockets.

There are other reasons to sell. Some guns just aren't flexible in what you want - HK's have grossly expensive accessories, the HK scope mounts went to $450 at one time, mags were horribly expensive until two years ago, and the only options on furniture were expensive - slim handguard, fat handguard, and color. Wood if you stumbled across a set. Choate alone had more options for the Rem 870 pump shotgun. The FNFAL, AUG, etc are all the same - no aftermarket support anything like the AR.

Then there is application - an HK isn't the lightest option for a woods gun hunting deer, is hard kicking compared to the AR, and doesn't get the job done any better for all the work. Same for Rem 700 bolt guns with scopes - don't crawl the stock, keep the power down for fast shots, make one shot count because deer can run faster than a bolt can be cranked in heavy cover. They don't have to go far to be lost.

So guns that don't help hit the sales table for those that do, and that's just the users view. Lot's of casual traders buy into a gun at 10% less than the going rate and wait to sell it at 10% over because their glib tongue and manners can get it. They just like to hustle the sale. How many of us can count the good deals at a gun show on one hand, but on the other, well, there's 400 tables of stuff that go right back out the door on Sunday evening - for the show next week 200 miles away. These guys don't negotiate much because the ups and downs of the business tell them they can wait it out, it will eventually move at their asking price.

Even in this economy, guns don't get sold for a loss very often.
 
I traded off a great shape Rem 700 in .338 Win Mag, the rifle was accurate, dependable, and certainly powerful. The recoil was too much for me, my shoulder just did not like it. Twenty rounds from the bench was all that I could take. I did not want to develop a flinch, so off it went. I settled on the 30-06 years ago as my hunting rifle. I don't go to Alaska or Africa, so I don't need the .338 Win Mag. The older I get the more I just love the '06
 
I broke my wrist as a kid back before they did major surgeries for stuff like that. Back then all they did was twist and yank on it until they thought it was in the right spot. I remember the pain of that moment like it was yesterday. Anyway, I remember the doctor saying that it was close enough after he looked at the xray. My wrist still has a little bump where it broke. Anyway, I can only shoot my favorite pistol (a stainless 686 in .357) about 20 times before my wrist binds up and I can't move it anymore. If I couldn't shoot .38's out of it I would have probably given it up a long time ago. Sadly I will probably never shoot a 44 mag more than once or twice in my life.
 
I sold a CETME, not due to accuracy, ammo cost, but for the fact it made it through one magazine and broke down. Never again for the CAI drunken monkeys! I sold an Intratec Tec-22 due to constant jamming, and I sold a fully functional, well made Astra A-100 45ACP as it is the only sidearm I have ever fired that I could not hit with. Others could, I couldn't, no idea why.
Other than that, firearms usually went for financial reasons, dagnabbit. :(
 
Last edited:
I sold off every Ruger I was ignorant enough to buy. Accuracy was main reason along with functional problems in some. Also sold off about half of my collection since I am getting old and don't want to saddle my wife down disposing of things she knows little about if I go first.
 
What does it for me is that you never really know a gun until you carry it afield for a while. I once bought a Ruger 96/44 and it felt great in the shop. Problem was, the small, crescent buttstock on such a light gun was miserable under recoil from a full house .44 mag. It's a shame that what was otherwise a handy little gun was undone by a bad stock.
 
What is a CETME? Stuff like this looses me entirely on threads. Please define.

As far as guns go, I have sold very few guns in recent years, but my shooting has tailed off substantially due to ammo cost, availability, and my schedule. Shooting is just not my first choice of activities when I have a day off. It is not even a second or third choice. When I have time and feel like it, I generally choose a 22 rimfire to shoot or either a 357 or 41 mag revolver.

With recoil issues, I just don't shoot them if I don't feel like it. I seldom get "tired" of a firearm. In my entire life, the only gun I got "tired of" was an HR 999 revolver which I dumped after learning just how poorly made they are as compared to Colts and Smith products. I got "tired of" being burnt by hot powder, hot lead fragments, and the sights working loose all the time. I have no place in my safe for junk. As always, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder and that is what makes the world go around.
 
Last edited:
I don't think I get tired of a "gun due to recoil, ammo cost or accuracy"

They've come and gone through the years. I've had my walk down the "belted magnum" road. Ammo costs never bothered me much, I just shoot cheaper calibers more. Accurate guns have come and gone as well.

I guess you reach the point where you look hard at what you have, and figure you could be just as happy with less. Or, the ones you never really shoot much, you look at those and figure you could probably go ahead and let it go. Some of the ones you think you want to build up, but never get around to it, might as well let someone else enjoy them.

I have found though.....that pistols take up a lot less space in the safe:cool:
 
I've never gotten rid of a gun due to being displeased with it. I take time in choosing firearms and as a result I get what I'm looking for and have a good idea of what that is. I have sold a gun in order to upgrade, but never because it has let me down, or the performance disappointed me. As for ammo cost it is what it is. I don't reload, but that hasn't stopped me from shooting specific weapons. As for recoil, my .338 Win Mag can be punishing if shooting more than a box, but it gets used, both at the range and in the field. I have to in order to feel comfortable when hunting with it.
 
Sunray/22-Rimfire:

I avoided mentioning the name "Century", which has assembled a huge amount of the Spanish-manufactured G-3s, even though many owners are happy with theirs.
There were so many problems with them, plus reloading issues, that I decided on a CMP Garand instead.

The choice of a few random reasons "...due to.." was to read and learn from you guys' perspectives. My interest in guns only developed less than three years ago, which I really regret in my middle-age:(.

By the way, I seldom use the recoil pad on the Lee-Enfield #5 "Jungle Carbine" or Yugo Mauser, even with skinny shoulders, but this is standing upright, or kneeling.
 
Like others I have never sold a gun due to ammo costs, I take that into consideration at purchase time. Once I have the dies its really a non issue anyhow.

I have sold or traded to upgrade to more spendy model many times. For some reason I really feel I need a Dakota Predator and want to sell my remington 22-250 to take a small dent out of its rather hefty asking price.

Like someone else said, needs and wants change. For a time I thought I was going to start uspa shooting, but ended up just not having the time and all the matches were 2+ hrs away. I don't plan on selling that Edge, but I probably wouldn't make that same purchase today.
 
I don't sell rifles :D

I did sell a few of my dad's pistols when I inherited them, and a couple of mine that were no longer to my taste. But I kept his old K-22, he'd bought that used in the late 1940's while at gunsmiths school.

I could see selling a wildly inaccurate gun if I couldn't fix it, but recoil and ammo cost doesn't bother me if I like the weapon - just shoot it less :D

I wanted to be a gun dealer when I was in HS, but dad told me not to bother - I'd have to work a full time job just to maintain my inventory of guns I'd never part with :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top