Evil Monkey
member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2006
- Messages
- 1,486
As I understand it, in the US military (either Marines, Army, or both) the doctrine behind the marksman rifle is to engage targets at longer ranges than assault rifles but still be able to operate with the rifleman in CQB.
Let me get straight to the point....
How can you do CQB with any rifle that has a telescopic sight on it? Isn't it a little too slow to acquire a target at CQB with a telescopic sight? Or are the marksmen taught to just point and shoot when entering a CQB structure?
http://www.gun-world.net/usa/m16/m16dmr.htm
That site shows that the SAMR are equipped with telescopes whereas the SDMR are primarily equipped with ACOGs. I'm guessing the doctrine of the marksman participating in the assault/CQB is more dominant in the Army rather than the Marine Corps?
All these weapons, configurations, variants, purposes, doctrines, etc. Why couldn't it just be like a video game where you have only 6 types of weapons that can do everything, the pistol, SMG, shotgun, assault rifle, sniper rifle, machine gun.
Let me get straight to the point....
How can you do CQB with any rifle that has a telescopic sight on it? Isn't it a little too slow to acquire a target at CQB with a telescopic sight? Or are the marksmen taught to just point and shoot when entering a CQB structure?
http://www.gun-world.net/usa/m16/m16dmr.htm
That site shows that the SAMR are equipped with telescopes whereas the SDMR are primarily equipped with ACOGs. I'm guessing the doctrine of the marksman participating in the assault/CQB is more dominant in the Army rather than the Marine Corps?
All these weapons, configurations, variants, purposes, doctrines, etc. Why couldn't it just be like a video game where you have only 6 types of weapons that can do everything, the pistol, SMG, shotgun, assault rifle, sniper rifle, machine gun.