Yeah. As soon as a technology is tried once and didn't work perfectly, it is never tried by anyone ever again.
It's been almost 20 years, nobody bought it then, no other manufacturers tried it, and the "benefits" are dubious, far outweighed by the detractors.
In theory, the no moving parts except the trigger is a good idea. In practice, it makes no measureable difference in accuracy, is more failure prone than a mechanical system, and requires an additional component beyond ammunition and firearm. Can you imagine having that trophy animal in your sights, only to discover your rifle's
batteries are dead? And what about in a SD situation
?
The EtronX trigger group:
But I'd bet that next real change is if someone makes a practical caseless round.
I just don't see it happening. The rounds work fine, the problem has always been the platform. Even once you get the chamber sealing squared away and the loading system worked out so that it doesn't damage the ammunition during feeding, there is still the heat and carbon/debris issue, and no one has found a practical way around that. Brass cases do more than just house the primer, charge and bullet-they're a heat sink, and they also take the carbon with them when they leave, in addition to other tiny debris that adheres to the brass during firing and gets extracted with it. Caseless ammo makes chambers look like the inside of gas piston tubes. The only way to fix that is a propellant that is 100% consumed during firing, leaving no residual deposits (which still does nothing for the debris and heat problems).
I know I seem like a pessimist in this thread, but it's kinda hard not to be when you've followed these developments from concept to prototype, sometimes to production and eventually to failure.