Also, i find
www.handgunreview.com to be a little nauseating.
1/2 the time i wonder if those people have any real experience with the guns at all.
Take the Ruger P95 reviews for instance. you have 10 or so 5 out of 5 reviews, and then you have this guy that claims he hates it, and it sucks, and that its a low quality gun, even though it fired 1,200 rounds withought a malfunction, yet he still gives it 3 out of five.
And then you have the guys that are like:
"Dont buy [random brand name]!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are the SuXoRs!!!!!!! Eff minus minus for [random brand name]!!!!!!! Yew shud bUy a Glock!!!!!!!!! Mine fired 10,000,000 rounds of +P+ with no ClEaNiNg and no malfunctions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
i swear some of these Dip-Sticks post reviews with Counter Strike as there only weapons experience.
Adn the guys that do know SOMETHING of firearms fail to realize that different designes do different things. Read the Glock review, and withough a doubt any negative coment will surely reffer to the "mushy trigger", like they axpect it to be a crisp single action or something.
The remainder of the reviewers dont seem to realize that all guns need to be given a break in period in excess of 2 mags.
Ick.
a bunch of HOBOS i tell you! :banghead: