Economic scope for a 22LR for precision rifle shooting.

Status
Not open for further replies.
For guys out there with similar dilemmas, let me suggest a Tract scope. These are growing in popularity and really really fine scopes. They are better than scopes that cost twice as much. I know because I own or have owned many scopes and these are the best. I just mounted my second Tract scope one my new 6.5 Creedmoor. My buddy ordered the one shown in the link I have attached. And the customer service is as good as the scope. They cut out the middle-man and deal directly with customers so prices are remarkably reasonable and the customer service is the best I've ever encountered. Here's the link,
https://tractoptics.com/all-products/22-fire-4-12x40-bdc-rimfire-rifle-scope
 
So I put the new Athlon Talos BTR 4-14×44 APLR2 FFP IR MIL through its paces yesterday.

I initially sighted it in at 50 yards and then ran it through a square shoot to see how it tracked. For the price it did that very well IMHO.
Pe3Q3FWl.jpg
Shooting the square is all done with the same point of aim (on the large center dot) to check that the turrets adjust the scope properly. Since shooting NRL22 is going to require dialing the scope fairly frequently I thought this was a good test to conduct. Started with two shots at the center spot. They were the lower two shots of the group of seven shots in the center spot. I then dialed up 22 clicks (2.2 mils) and fired a shot. That should have moved the point of impact 3.96 inches, basically all the shot for the square should have been just inside (0.040 inch) the square formed by the four smaller red dots. I then proceeded around the square counter clockwise (22 click moves) ending with a five shot group at the center. I was please with the results, except maybe the bottom middle shot but that might have been me.

I also chrono'ed the SK Standard Plus ammo from my gun using my old Shooting Chrony Alpha Master. The velocity was not as consistent as I had expected but still shot fairly well. I ended up running 25 rds across the chrono at two different times in my playing.

First string was 10 shots
Low: 1008 fps
High: 1056 fps
Average: 1030.6 fps
Extreme Spread: 50 fps
Standard Deviation: 16.19 fps


The second string was the fifteen(15) shots of from the shooting the square target above.
Low: 1030 fps
High: 1067 fps
Average: 1041.1 fps
Extreme Spread: 44 fps
Standard Deviation: 12.1 fps

I was really hoping to see Standard Deviation in the single digits and extreme spreads closer to 25 fps but this is still plenty good for shooting NRL22 ranges.

I use Strelok Pro App on my phone for a lot of my shooting so I update my zero and scope information for my 10/22 and selected SK Standard Plus from the internal library for a BC. I adjust the velocity to match the above data and moved back to 100 yards. Strelok Pro told me to come up 2.2 mils (that was luck, being exactly the same as what I shot the square with) for 100 yards. I was going to true the Strelok solution by using an internal function that lets it change the BC to match your real world data but it appears that it does not need trued as it was right on.

9ij1GJ0l.jpg
My best 5-shot 100 yard group after dialing the Strelok predicted 2.2 mil adjustment (22 clicks).

At this point I am very pleased with the scope. The above group was the best of several I shot but I was getting the occasional flies and most of my other groups were ~1.3 MOA due to these fliers. I think I am going to give the barrel a good cleaning with CR-10 and start over re-seasoning it with this new SK ammo. I also need to stretch the range out even more. NRL22 never officially shoots further than 100 yards but the group I am shooting with like to add two bonus stages to the five official monthly stages at the monthly matches and those have stretch ranges out to nearly 200 yards.

Can't wait to give this try at the next match. Thanks for reading all my rambling and all the feedback and advice.
 
Last edited:
Doing a little dry fire practice tonight trying to get use to the new Vorquartsen trigger and found that the sun-shade that came with my Vortex HS 2.5-10x44 fits on the Athlon Talos BTR 4-14x44 nearly perfectly. The threads were the same, the sun shade was maybe .02-.03 inch larger in diameter but will work just fine. I don't use it on the Vortex since that is on a hunting rifle and just makes noise in the brush but for NRL22 match the addition of the sun-shade for both shade and a good place to rest my weak hand in some shooting position will be nice. I also threw the Atlas bipod on it as I think its going to be particularly useful on one of the stages this month.

iJFfJsPl.jpg
 
Last edited:
Consider a Bushnell "AR-Optic" Rimfire scope 4.5-18X40. Clear glass, $180 list price, can be found for $175 at Optics planet and I purchased one for $99 at a Bushnell Outlet store. They also come with illuminated reticles if that's your thing.
 
The new scope performed great for me today at the monthly NRL22 match. I am still getting use to remembering to dial the parallax adjustment as range changes but other than that it ran very well for me. I did not dial as much as I expected, as all but two of the seven stages had targets at 50 yards. Since I was zeroed for 50 yards most of the time I held for rather than dial longer range targets. Seems like you could burn a lot of time dialing and adjusting parallax. The best was the stage that had targets at 100, 85, 75, 65, & 50 yards all in one 12 shot stage. The reticle really shined on that stage, that would have been a bugger with the old Tasco. I did clean the one bonus stage that was 10 shots at two targets (6-in square and a 5-inch round) at 188 yards. There is something very satisfying about ring still that far out with a 22LR.

I managed a 3rd place finish despite the new Vorquartsen fire-control letting me down. I had at least one miss fire on the last three stages. Will have to do some investigation on that before the next match.
 
Glad to hear the Nikon Prostaff Rimfires work well. I have one on an older 22 rifle I intend to use out to 200 or maybe even 300 yards. It's currently zeroed at 50, but I've only shot it a couple of times. Holds zero at least.
 
Glad to hear the Nikon Prostaff Rimfires work well. I have one on an older 22 rifle I intend to use out to 200 or maybe even 300 yards. It's currently zeroed at 50, but I've only shot it a couple of times. Holds zero at least.
I've got two of them, and I'm awfully happy with them. Nice and bright, easy to see, even with eyes as old as mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top