huntershooter
Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,058
Well said.Best argument for open carry I've seen in a long time.
I will admit that I don't like the holster exposing the trigger,
It's not an issue with a 1911.
With a 1911, the trigger is blocked by the grip safety and the sear is blocked by the thumb safety. Neither of which can be disengaged by pressure on the trigger. In addition, when holstered and strapped, the hammer is blocked by the strap. So covering the trigger accomplishes nothing. Though certainly not recommended practice, you could hang the entire rig as pictured on a nail through the trigger guard without any chance of an incident.I'm sure Tex Grebner would disagree - I don't think it wise with ANY gun - and most of the major action pistol sports require the trigger be covered (regardless of gun type). To me that's about like saying its ok to point a gun at someone if its unloaded (not as bad - but same mindset). Safe practices are meant to stack atop each other.
As I said though the workmanship on the holster and gun look great.
With a 1911, the trigger is blocked by the grip safety and the sear is blocked by the thumb safety. Neither of which can be disengaged by pressure on the trigger. In addition, when holstered and strapped, the hammer is blocked by the strap. So covering the trigger accomplishes nothing. Though certainly not recommended practice, you could hang the entire rig as pictured on a nail through the trigger guard without any chance of an incident.
A Glock or other firearm with a similar "safe trigger" design, in a similar rig would be completely unsafe. With a Glock especially, the only mechanical safety is on the trigger, which means there is no safety at all when the gun is holstered except what can be provided by covering or blocking access to the trigger.
That said, I don't wish to sidetrack this thread discussing this issue. I won't post anymore in this thread about this matter. If you want to continue the other thread...