Embrace The Truth - Catastrophic Gun Failure

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brian Ward

Member
Joined
May 21, 2015
Messages
34
Thompson / Center Arms Found at Fault in Catastrophic Gun Failure


On September 1, 2005, I was severely injured by a catastrophic gun failure. My face was permanently disfigured and sight in my right eye was lost forever. I was shooting with the Thompson/Center Encore Rifle. It blew apart because of a defect in its design. That horrendous day propelled me down a path I never planned on or wanted in my life. I’m not speaking out for personal gain or to be vindictive toward Smith & Wesson or Thompson/Center Arms (Thompson/Center Arms has apparently been sold to Smith & Wesson). I merely want the truth about this rifle to be known. I don’t want anyone to go through the pain and suffering I’ve endured. In my opinion, this rifle defect is something that was known about and has been covered up for years.

After almost 10 years of battling over the Encore, I received the final judgment order from the 46th Circuit Court for the County of Otsego, Michigan. I sued Thompson Center Arms (TCA), and the jury found TCA at fault. The jury found TCA to have a defect in its design and found their manual to be defective.

Throughout this entire process, from the day that my rifle had failed, until being given the green light to speak freely about this rifle, I have felt as though I’m involved in a David and Goliath scenario. In the end, no matter how much money they threw at this problem, with their team of lawyers and paid experts, the truth could not be veiled from the jury. At many points over the nearly 10 years since my injury, I have experienced hopelessness about the outcome of the case. One of these moments occurred during the trial. My attorney had in his possession letters, obtained from Thompson/Center through discovery, from other individuals who had incurred similar injuries from the same type of failure. Although the letters were discussed in open court, they were not allowed to be shown to the jury as evidence, based on a technicality concerning Thompson / Center’s claims as to when they had actually received the letters in relation to the date of my injury. A representative of the company did admit that he saw failures of this kind during testing. He also admitted that TCA destroys customer complaints every six months.

Because of the pending suit, I have not been able to share these details until recently. I cannot adequately express what a tremendous relief it is to be able to finally share the truth about the dangers of this rifle.

Most gun owners I know - including myself - thought suing a gun company was practically blasphemy. My suit was never about anything more than seeking truth. I believe wholeheartedly in the Constitution and stand for our Second Amendment rights. I love freedom. I was an NRA member when my injury occurred and I’m an NRA member now.

This is the first lawsuit brought against TCA regarding this rifle that has been successfully litigated. In my opinion, TCA is fighting me so hard because the Encore Rifle has been wildly popular. A recall would cost potentially a lot of money. Still, I am now finally allowed to spread the truth about this gun. Please notify anyone you know who owns this rifle that it could catastrophically fail!

The judgment is attached. I have blacked out the award amounts because the money is not important in this regard. No amount of money can compensate me for the loss of my sight and the years spent in recovery. Additionally, I truly believe this company will continue to fight this judgment, and as a result I will never see any monetary compensation. The court documents are now a matter of public record, and if you wish to seek out more details they can be obtained.

Thank you for your time, and if you would like any additional information please let me know.

Sincerely,

Brian Ward
 
Thank you for spreading the word on these many, many forums you've joined today to increase awareness of this problem you've had.
 
I'm very sorry for your accident and injury. I don't know if you can go into detail but if you could what was the failure and defect in the T/C. I personally do not own one but I'm sure owners of that firearm would be interested. Best of luck.
 
Nothing attached and few/no details.

More info please or people (me included) will think it odd this is your first post along with also being your first post on other forums.

What was the issue/defect? Caliber of rifle, etc?
 
Brian - Can you give us a cliff note version of the defect? I'm not familiar with the T/C Encore.
 
A casual I-net search engine scan shows that Mr. Ward posted the same topic and post on at least two other firearm-related forums. He evidently hasn't posted an attachment on those sites either.

Perhaps Mr. Ward transposed the contents of an email to these various gun sites, and forgot to remove the part about an attachment... :confused:

.
 
Mr. Ward, you've posted this here and on several other forums. It's your first and only post on THR. Please send a PM to myself or another moderator with a link to the judgement or similar independently verifiable proof of your claim. Once you provide that to us we'll reopen this thread so the discussion can continue with the facts independently available for review.
 
Embrace The Truth - Catastrophic Gun Failure - Attachment

Sorry for the delay!

I’m just posting this everywhere I can….kind of busy.

The other thread was locked
 

Attachments

  • Judgement and verdict Brian Ward Vs T.C. Arms.pdf
    286.8 KB · Views: 262
To summarize and very very briefly in my opinion the big take away from my case was the TCA Encore can not keep tolerances and head space grows overtime, especially with larger calibers like I was shooting (300 win mag).
In my trial we had 3 guns with excessive head space.
My gun was out of spec.
A gun with 5 shots was out of spec.
A gun with no shots was out of spec.
 
The O.P. left out something important

From the attachment...

"The judgment also must be reduced by 40% comparative fault."

What did the jury determined were your actions that contributed to the accident?

From the nationalgunforum.com...

A case evaluation as required by the Michigan court was held on November 13, 2009, in which the panel recommended a settlement in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $325. We rejected this proposed settlement award.

Why is the final judgment a secret?

Has T/C filed a appeal?

Inquiring minds what to know.
 
Last edited:
From the attachment...



What did the jury determined were your actions that contributed to the accident?

Why is the judgment a secret?

Inquiring minds what to know.

Nothing is secret. The information is available from the 46th Circuit Court for the County of Otsego, Michigan.

I’m not going to post thousands of pages of information.

When an entity essentially has unlimited money to bring doubt, defame, etc.. it’s an up hill battle.
 
purpose of the post?....

I read over the title & post several times.
Am I missing something? Why did you post these remarks?
Did people not believe your injuries were caused by the firearm? :confused:
Do you think gun forum members need to know something about your civil action?
It sounds like you had serious injuries and filed suit for the medical bills/mental anguish, emotional distress, etc.
The legal document states the company was liable for 60% of the accident & you were at fault for 40%.

I don't understand why or how posting statements on US gun forums is needed.
edit: I see the section where you want to gun owners or hunters to be aware of the safety/design issues(problems). That seems prudent but the company should put out a recall if the problem is a engineering or production flaw.
 
Last edited:
Nothing is secret. The information is available from the 46th Circuit Court for the County of Otsego, Michigan.

I’m not going to post thousands of pages of information.

No need to quote thousands of pages of information.

Just a paragraph about what your actions were that the jury / court determined contributed to the action.

The amount you were awarded is only one word.

Don't be surprised at the lack of sympathy you will receive on this forum. Trashing a company when not accompanied by full disclosure of the facts is not up to the standards of THR.
 
From the attachment...



What did the jury determined were your actions that contributed to the accident?

From the nationalgunforum.com...



Why is the final judgment a secret?

Has T/C filed a appeal?

Inquiring minds what to know.
They requested a new trial yesterday. Crazy!
 
Why the dramatic thread title followed by agonizing lack of technical detail?This is the first I've read of this failure.

Details man!!

What are the dollar amounts?

What do you want to know detail wise?

I psoted:

To summarize and very very briefly in my opinion the big take away from my case was the TCA Encore can not keep tolerances and head space grows overtime, especially with larger calibers like I was shooting (300 win mag).
In my trial we had 3 guns with excessive head space.
My gun was out of spec.
A gun with 5 shots was out of spec.
A gun with no shots was out of spec.

Also in my initial post:

The judgment is attached. I have blacked out the award amounts because the money is not important in this regard. No amount of money can compensate me for the loss of my sight and the years spent in recovery. Additionally, I truly believe this company will continue to fight this judgment, and as a result I will never see any monetary compensation. The court documents are now a matter of public record, and if you wish to seek out more details they can be obtained.
 
Nothing is secret. The information is available from the 46th Circuit Court for the County of Otsego, Michigan.

I’m not going to post thousands of pages of information.

When an entity essentially has unlimited money to bring doubt, defame, etc.. it’s an up hill battle.

So you have decided to spend large amounts of time to defame T/C?

What did you do that the court found you 40% responsible for accident?
 
Hi Brian-

Without going through the whole detailed document, can you say if you were wearing eye protection during the incident? Not placing blame, just curious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top