Ever wish that certain knives were offered from less expensive steel?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The people making nation of manufacturing a criteria are often out of date on their understanding of the change in manufacturing quality and/or are simply making a nationalistic based decision. We used to equate Japanese products with junk and now accept that it means quality. As Japan became equated with quality instead of junk, China assumed Japan's old role as the supplier of cheap disposable junk. Now we find Chinese first world quality products (check your watch, computer, phone, pocket knife) almost as easily as disposable junk, although the interesting thing about Chinese manufacturing is they'll make junk as readily as first quality as long as there's sufficient profit. There are entrepreneurs working to make India and Pakistan manufacturing and products competitive with China/Italy/USA in producing quality consumer goods and we may one day look at "paki crap" as just an evolution in knife manufacturing quality.
Actually as post WWII Japanese manufacturing continued to evolve and costs began to climb, low-cost production of precision goods first moved to places like Hong Kong, Malaysia and Taiwan, well before they moved to Mainland China.

In come cases, high quality goods (e.g. Miroku firearms, Nikon cameras) produced almost immediately after WWII, were still ignorantly and maliciously judged to be "jap crap" for decades.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps a slightly different perspective on blade steel marketing. I tend to pay more attention to a knife if the maker readily provides the information on what steel is used. That is true even if the steel involved isn't considered to be a premium steel. I feel like, to at least some extent, it reflects that the manufacturer is catering to informed customers which is generally a good thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top