Evil SUV advertisements

Status
Not open for further replies.
It ain't whut ya drive, it's how ya drive. Any vehicle can be driven well.

That said, it's a free country, and you can drive what you can aford. Can't legislate or implicate good taste or common sense. Moronic, idiotic, inconsiderate, proctologically-challenged drivers are just that, regardless of their choice of vehicle, just happens that SUV's are 'fashionable' these daze, and the same bunch of elitist buttholes whut think they knows whut's gud fer you in every other aspect of your life feel equally free to tell you what you should be driving (or not).

Personally, I hate the damn things because I feel that large clumsey vehicles in the hands of the inept are a threat to me. We're talkin' idjits whut think that 4wd/awd, anti-lock brakes, etc., repeal the laws of physics, and I take great glee every time I see one on it's roof in the median.

I mean no offense to those who actually drive 'em reasonably/responsibly, live in the boonies, who actually go further off road than the shoulder, who really have things to tow, etc., but here in yup central, where they're 'an active livestyle accessory', well, I'm just glad they got out of BMWs (my vehicle of choice, as they gave the marque (any marque) a bad name), and moved on to something else. stoopid is as stoopid does.

Like a lot of you, I really like them when I see some sort of environmental cause or "Liberal' bumper sicker on 'em, too. As for terrorists and gov't propagandist, they should stay out from between my headlights.

I could rant on, but I bet y'all get my drift.
 
OIL MONEY SUPPORTS SOME TERRIBLE THINGS. WHAT KIND OF MILEAGE DOES YOUR SUV GET?

I'm gonna take a hint from those Nick and Norm anti-drug ads:
Nick: Okay, so it's true.
Norm: What's true?
Nick: Oil money funds terrorism.
Norm: It is true.
Nick: Okay...!
Norm: Okay...?
Nick: Look, let's say I buy some gas for my Geo Metro.
Norm: Let's say.
Nick: Hypothetical.
Norm: Let's say.
Nick: Now how much of my gas money actually makes it to the bad guys' hands? A couple of bucks.
Norm: A few bucks.
Nick: A few bucks! That's it. Peanuts.
Norm: So what you're saying is that it's okay to support terrorism... a little.
Nick: Did I say that?

okay.jpg

ploy.jpg


If you drive a fuel efficient car, I guess it's ok for you to support terrorism, a little.


:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Glocks support terrorism. Any plastic can pretty well trace it's roots to a petroleum based precursor of some sort. Any forged steel product that wasn't refined over a coal fire was either petroleum heated or electric furnace. A fair amount of electricity is from oil fired generators.

These ad people are treating us like idiots. This is our war on terrorism?
 
you know why they call em Soccer Moms?
Because they are hauling Soccer teams all over gods green earth
2 SUVs trump 5 Hybrids in hauling the team from hear to yonder

BTW did anybody catch Rush's "In a Yugo" done to Elvis's In the Ghetto It was killer I think Paul Shanklin did the music LMAO:D
 
I read these anti-SUV posts and get the same urge to puke as I do when I read anti-gun, anti-second amendment, and anti-freedom drivel.

"The High Road" indeed!:rolleyes:
 
Well, this thread makes me soooooo irritated that I think I'll take a drive in my big old ugly 3/4 ton Ford 4X4 PU and burn both tanks of gas out of it. That should relax the tension. Then go and fill it up. Glug, glug, glug, glug................:what:

I don't remember where but not too long ago I read an article that listed American oil companys that did, and did not buy middle east oil. If we were really serious about not supporting terrorist countries, we would buy from those companies that did not use middle east oil.

As for theses commercials I believe they are idiotic at best. I feel for the kid that did the voice over on the one. I hope he was paid for his work and understands it is just a job, and didn't believe what he read. But I won't hold my breath.
 
Neil Cavuto had a good rant about this last week. Huffington et al. regularly fly private jets all over the country, burning a lot more fuel than Joe Q. Average driving an SUV.

"Frugality for thee but not for me" I think was the phrase he used agaist this hypocrisy.
 
Malone LaVeigh
Member

Saddam and Osama would be overjoyed to hear this conversation...



No they wouldn't. They don't have a good reason to care what we do here.

Saddam just wants us not to interfere with his military adventures, and Osama just wants us to stop supporting the Saudi Royal Family.

Weimadog
 
Huffington planted the seeds for The Detroit Project in her nationally syndicated column in October by fantasizing about a people's ad campaign taking the government to task for failing to pass tougher fuel efficiency standards while waging war to protect cheap oil.

Readers flooded her ''in'' basket with more than 5,000 letters by the next morning, asking where to send money for the mythical campaign. Within three weeks she had raised $200,000 to pay for a week of airtime and production of the ads.


there appear to be quite a few "up lifters" with spare cash
 
Lookat the source, Arianna Huffington. She married him and was actually admitted to being a fag for years after he lost the Senate race to Swinestein. If she couldn't even tell that her husband was gay, how can you trust anything she says?
 
I do not care WHAT they say... I drive a Dodge Ram 1500 with a HEALTHY (Read: 400+ horsepower) 360 C.I. engine, attaining a whoppin' 13 to 15 MPG... lifted a little(3"), and set up for pullin' and playin in the woods.

and when that ain't enough, I get into a gas guzzlin' '70 'Cuda, with a 500+ horse HEMI... , attaining a lofty 8 MPG (on a good day), and go fast...

I used to have a respectable Saturn SL1... but I couldn't STAND the dumnb useless thing... 35 MPG was it's ONLY redeemable feature, and it just wasn't worth the discomfort to drive it...

I also have a "gas squeezer" - it is a '83 Jeep CJ-7 Laredo... @ 18 MPG, with 4" of lift it's the best I got... and even THAT is only until the current (original stock) engine dies... then it too will get a high-horse gas guzzler installed... (I think a well tuned big-block Mopar will do nicely!)

I do not CARE what anyone else thinks of this... I drive these vehicles to please ME, and not "the world @ large"

It makes me happy to drive them, and I can afford to drive them... and that is all that matters.

and anyone who thinks different may do 2 things...

1.-Smootch my backside.

2.-get outta my way, 'cause if you try to cause me problems, I'll drive THROUGH your gas squeezer (I am positive that it'll hurt the midget-mobile FAR worse than it'll hurt me!)
 
6,300 pound, 22 foot long, 8 foot wide, 9 MPG, F-350, one ton, crew cab, dually driver.

So buying a polyester shirt, a ball point pen, A computer floppy disk, a television set, or any other item mainly made of plastic materials must also support terrorism as all of these are petrochemical products made from imported oil.

In fact, the cars these clowns support are made mainly of plastics. Aren't they supporting terrorism by buying these petrochemical based products?
 
My other car is a Red Barchetta.

If enjoying one's self behind the wheel of an internal combustion-powered machine is supporting Osama, then Allahu akhbar!, baby.
 
Unless, of course, it's the kind of cocktail cooked up by Molotov.

pax
 
Malone LaVeigh,

"Infantile toys"? Like the computer you're typing on?

Oh, no, wait! I know!

"Infantile toys" are things that I enjoy, while mature hobbies are what you like, right?

Scratch any freedom lover in the right place, and you'll always get the Nazi to pop out of his pocket...
 
Leave it in the ground.
Why? Is there some use you envision in the future for dead, compressed dinosaurs and plant matter?

What the heck, let's convert the majority of our energy usage to coal...we have hundreds, perhaps thousands, of years of reserves. Would that work, IYO, for you and your green-weenie comrades who think that destruction of private property is "occasionally justified" to protect 'Mother Nature'?

Course that would take away some infantile toys.
Your sole means of transportation is a bicycle? Your attitude is increasingly in-tune with that of the oh-so-fascist Bill O'Reilly who avers that those of us who have to haul lots of folks and lots of gear are "selfish".

How 'bout if we take two vehicles averaging 25 mpg on a trip instead of one averaging 18 mpg. Would that satisfy your illogic?

How 'bout a fed.gov mandate that we all drive those pitiful little crackerbox electric cars? Know where we get the energy to recharge the $5,000 battery packs?

In my area, it's from burning coal or cracking atoms.

Or shall we all go to horsedrawn carriages? But wait...the world's biggest source of "greenhouse gases" beyond basic human respiration is animal flatulence.

Genetic engineering to the rescue?

I can't take your ideas seriously...if you want to thrust your silly notions on any segment of the population, start with the hypocrites in Hollyweird and that fool, Al "no controlling legal authority" Gore, who claims that the biggest threat to the human species is the internal combustion engine.

Good luck banning those limousines and Secret Service SUV's...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top