Ex-cop sentenced to 102 years for staging raids

Status
Not open for further replies.

peyton

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
661
I saw this news article this morning and it is the reason I tell my family not to open the door for ANYONE. I think the biggest shame is the betrayal of the public trust. Lucky no citizens were killed in the execution of these phony raids. I could not figure why the other "Criminals" got off with lesser sentences??

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24725536/

LOS ANGELES - A former Los Angeles police officer who participated in home invasion robberies staged to look like police raids was sentenced Monday to 102 years in prison.

William Ferguson, 35, was convicted of participating in more than 40 phony raids from early 1999 to June 2001 at homes in working-class neighborhoods while he worked at the department's scandal-ridden Rampart Division.

In January, a federal jury convicted him of conspiracy to deprive people of their civil rights, conspiracy to possess marijuana and cocaine, violating the civil rights of others and using a firearm during a violent crime.

Ferguson's sentence was so severe because he was convicted of four firearms charges which carry a mandatory sentence of 82 years in prison.

U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess said that Congress passed such sentencing laws "because they don't trust people like me."

"It's not a reasonable sentence," he said.

After the hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Douglas Miller said prosecutors were pleased.

Punishment too harsh?
Ferguson's attorney, Philip Deitch, said it was unfair and violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.

"He's going to be 147-years-old when he gets out," Deitch said. "He's probably not going to see his children again."

Deitch said Ferguson was unfairly punished because prosecutors would not give Ferguson a plea agreement unless he testified against his brother Joseph Ferguson, an ex-Long Beach officer. Otherwise, his client would have pleaded guilty long ago, he said.

Joseph Ferguson, 33, was convicted of charges that included conspiring to violate civil rights and conspiring to possess drugs with the intent to distribute them. He was sentenced earlier this month to more than eight years in prison.

Besides the Ferguson brothers, 15 other people have pleaded guilty or were convicted in the case, including lawmen from other departments. Two others who have been indicted are fugitives.
 
Last edited:
"He's going to be 147-years-old when he gets out," Deitch said. "He's probably not going to see his children again."
His punishment is way too light for 40+ home invasions. Its too bad we gave up drawing and quartering. he earned that kind of punishment.
 
Hmm... For two years he and his cronies raided homes disguised as police, robbed them, and were lucky no one was killed. A serious breech of public trust by an officer, not to mention the corruption involved, the forging of documents, lying under oath, and everything else required to pull of such scams...

And their complaining he's going to spend the rest of his life in jail? The slime deserves it.
 
He got such a heavy sentence, not for his crimes, but because he was in posession of a firearm.

For the actual crimes he only got 20 years.

You guys are cheering on a life sentence that was handed out by an anti-gun culture.
 
I think he got off light myself and the fact that he will never see his kids again is a blessing to them and the rest of society. He won't be able to corrupt them and make them like himself.
 
He got such a heavy sentence, not for his crimes, but because he was in posession of a firearm.
What are you saying? That armed robbery and assault shouldn't be worth the time? He didn't get 100+ years for having a gun. He got 100+years for using a gun to commit a violent crime on 40 occasions over two years. If it were Bob Jones or Alajuwan DJambe, a common street thug who did the same thing, would you argue for a lesser sentence?
 
You guys are cheering on a life sentence that was handed out by an anti-gun culture.

Was it not Ronald Reagan that signed these firearms min mandatories in the '86 fed crim law reforms?

Ilbob, El Tej, and Fiero are here. NOW IT'S A PARTY!

Master, everyone here at THR lives in utter terror of a situation such as this. With the expansion of the Militarization/Dreaded Demon of Darkness/SWAT mentality of today's law enforcement and all the accompanying issues, e.g. wearing of masks, hiding identities, no knock raids, mistaken addresses, it is getting harder with each passing day to distinguish legitimate authority from street thugs.

Most of us here own firearms to defend ourselves and we would like to think that the police are on our side. A betrayal of trust such as this is very serious and people will have a "gut level" response to it.
 
Regardless of where the mandatory sentances came from, in this particular case,, as a member of the law enforcement community, I am happy he was given a long sentance. I have long said LE should be held to a higher standard, NOT a lower one.
 
Florida has a 10-20-Life law that says:

Use a gun during the commission of a crime - 10 Year Minimum
Shoot a gun during the commission a crime - 20 Year Minimum
Shoot someone during the commission of a crime - Life

I have ZERO problem with that.
 
MOM wrote:


He got such a heavy sentence, not for his crimes, but because he was in posession of a firearm.

For the actual crimes he only got 20 years.

You guys are cheering on a life sentence that was handed out by an anti-gun culture.


MOM,

What's the disconnect?


MOST gunowners WANT stiff penalties for commiting crimes with firearms. I'd MUCH rather punishment be delt to the CRIMINALS rather than the society as a whole. We'd much rather that than blanket bans.

It just isn't the Anti's that want stiff penalties for commiting crimes with firearms.



And I have to agree with the above. This is the second thread in the last few days where you have jumped on talking about "Cop Bashing" where there was none.

I know you are a cop, but it seems that you are spoiling for an arguement. I think you are a little too emotionally attached to the issue.


And don't tell me that 100% of LEO's are above reproach. You and I BOTH know better. However, Insomuch as generalizations of LEO's is counter-productive, equally so is your unwaivering blanket support.

It makes me seriously consider that whole "Thin Blue Line" thing. If anything, it only causes MORE skepticism.

Experienced LEO's that I know-- including my wifes grandfather who was Police Chief for 30 years-- do not want to defend those that give the profession a bad name.



-- John
 
"He's going to be 147-years-old when he gets out," Deitch said. "He's probably not going to see his children again."

They can visit him in prison...

Commiting heinous crimes, reaping all the rewards, and then whining about the consequenses...

This guy has no business walking on the streets.
 
Is it an indicator

of the attorneys thought process?
He will not "get out when he's 147"
He will be dead and I'm glad he choose you as his attorney.
 
I'm not arguing that the guy shouldn't have been punished, but murderers don't get that kind of time in prison. The punishment is supposed to fit the crime. That is how our system works.
 
I'm not arguing that the guy shouldn't have been punished, but murderers don't get that kind of time in prison. The punishment is supposed to fit the crime. That is how our system works.

Actually, our system doesn't work.

Murderers SHOULD get more time than this.

They don't. That, however, does not make this punishment wrong; it makes the punishment for murders wrong.
 
U.S. District Judge Gary Allen Feess said that Congress passed such sentencing laws "because they don't trust people like me."

"It's not a reasonable sentence," he said.

I can see why the don't trust a judge who feels that this sentence was too light. They don't trust you because you're an idiot and should be removed from the bench.
 
I'm not arguing that the guy shouldn't have been punished, but murderers don't get that kind of time in prison. The punishment is supposed to fit the crime. That is how our system works.

Not in Florida, we put murderers to death.....

Actually given the number of crimes he committed, 102 years is actually kind of light. He should never see the outside of a prison. He is only 33 years old and who knows where medical science might be in 50 years? He just might see 135 and could unfortunately get out. Hopefully, before that day happens I hope they can "fix him" first.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top