The Real Hawkeye
member
I would like to do some dry fire practice with my STG-58 FAL variant. Is there any problem with this? Do I need snap caps? Anyone dry fire without snap caps and then have a problem as a result?
Thanks Bruce. That's what I figured, but it is good to finally hear it from someone with extensive first hand experience on the subject. Did you ever hear of an armorer fixing an FAL and stating that the reason for the needed repair was too much dry firing practice? Thanks.BruceB said:The FAL is indeed a battle rifle and may be dryfired extensively without harm. It was my service rifle in the Canadian Army back in the early '60s, and we dry-fired a LOT.
The only caution flag I'd raise, is that one should NOT dryfire an FAL if the bolt carrier group is not in the rifle to stop the hammer's fall. In such a case, the hammer strikes the front edge of its receiver slot with enough force that it could either batter the slot, or maybe even become fatigued sufficiently to break off at the impact point, which is just above the axis of the hammer pin. There's a lot of energy being concentrated on a very small part of the hammer when it impacts the receiver.