FBI suggests Congress ban gun sales to terrorism suspects

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
This is no surprise. From what I hear, there has been no provision made to get off the terrorism suspects list once you are on it.
Teddy Kennedy and another big wheel in Washington managed to get off the terrorism suspects list by talking to the head of the department.
If you or I got on the terrorism suspects list, I am sure it would do no good to ask them to remove us from the list.
They really need a way to for people on the terrorism suspects list to appeal and get their names removed.


FBI suggests Congress ban gun sales to terrorism suspects
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-03-08-terror-guns_x.htm

By Thomas Frank, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — FBI Director Robert Mueller suggested Tuesday that Congress consider barring terrorism suspects from legally buying guns after an audit found that 47 people on a terrorism watch list were approved for purchases last year.

FBI Director Robert Mueller testifies at the House of Representatives.
Paul J. Richards, AFP

Gun sales are denied to convicted felons, fugitives, convicted drug users, illegal aliens and others under federal gun laws. But a Government Accountability Office report made public Tuesday pointed out that being suspected of having a link to a terrorist or a terrorist group is not among the nine criteria that prevent someone from legally buying a firearm. It only triggers a more intense background check of the person before a gun dealer can sell them a gun.

"We ought to look at what can be done to perhaps modify the law," Mueller told members of a House Appropriations subcommittee.

The National Rifle Association says the current law is protecting Americans from terrorists while allowing citizens the freedom to own guns. Wayne LaPierre, the NRA's chief executive, said under the law, if the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System gets a hit that someone applying for a gun permit is on a terror watch list, the government official who put that person on the list and other counterterrorism personnel are notified.

"They are specifically asked whether there's a good reason to deny this person buying a firearm," LaPierre told the Associated Press in an interview. "If there is, the person is denied. If there is not, the person is not denied."

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., who requested the audit, reacted with a call to undo a year-old law that requires the FBI to destroy records of applications to purchase guns within 24 hours of approval.

"It's aiding and abetting terrorists," Lautenberg said. "Lots of times you can't uncover the data you need in 24 hours."

Lautenberg introduced a bill Tuesday that would require federal authorities to keep a record of gun purchase applications by anyone on federal watch lists for 10 years.

LaPierre said Lautenberg was "misusing" the GAO audit to "manufacture support" for extending the amount of time gun applications are kept. The NRA supports the policy of maintaining records of gun buyer applicants for only 24 hours.

Peter Hamm, spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said current policies "benefit terrorists and benefit criminals."

The FBI said that it typically keeps some sort of record when someone it is investigating for ties to terrorism applies for a gun. The investigations are secret, although denying a terrorism suspect a gun permit could clue him in that he is on a list.

Lautenberg also wrote Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and asked whether he thinks terrorism suspects should be barred from legal gun purchases.

Lautenberg did not directly call for barring such purchases, although he said: "You can't get on an airplane if you're a terrorist, but you can buy a gun. Which is worse?"

The watch list, called the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File, is the FBI's clearinghouse for thousands of people of interest to the government, from true terrorism suspects and associates to their relatives, neighbors or co-workers.

This year, the Homeland Security Department's civil rights division and inspector general opened inquiries into the treatment of more than 50 people, many of them Muslim Americans, who were detained while returning to the USA from Canada after their names turned up on the list.

None of the detainees was arrested, but some were held and interrogated about their activities for more than four hours. Those inquiries were continuing.

Contributing: Kevin Johnson and the Associated Press
 
How exactly does a person get on such a list? How and why was Kennedy on that list?
 
Oh yeah, let's deny people their constitutional rights because they are on a secret list of people who might do bad things... :barf:

Mueller needs to resign.

Jeff
 
They are suspects. Either charge them with something or get off of their backs.

If they aren't convicted, then their rights cannot be infringed. :banghead:
 
We caught you on some websites we don't like. You're on the list. You borrowed a book from the library we don't like. You're on the list. You happened to fly overseas a few years ago. You're on the list. You made some comments that we think might be anti-government. You're on the list. A friend or family member t on white supremacist websites. You're on the list because you might share the same views.


And by the way, the list is classified, so you cannot tell you are on it, and there is no way to appeal your placement on it.

Sounds great. :banghead:
 
What does that fine upright supporter of the RKBA, GWB, have to say about this? Does the FBI have to ask the AG and thus GWB before suggesting such?

Look at all the doofuses that post : SHALL WE FIGHT?
on gun boards and read Unintended Consequences. Sounds terroristic to me. I have no use with lax treatment of terrorist suspects. In fact, if they are such charge them and/or if they are aliens boot them after a fair hearing.

This is a slippery slope attack on the RKBA again. GWB is too dumb to realize it or goes along with it. :fire:
 
We caught you on some websites we don't like. You're on the list. You borrowed a book from the library we don't like. You're on the list. You happened to fly overseas a few years ago. You're on the list. You made some comments that we think might be anti-government. You're on the list. A friend or family member t on white supremacist websites. You're on the list because you might share the same views.


And by the way, the list is classified, so you cannot tell you are on it, and there is no way to appeal your placement on it.

Sounds great.

"meet the new boss, same as the old boss" - The Who.

Guns? Guns? I don't have any stinking guns!!
 
So a sane, drug-free adult American taxpaying citizen who's never been arrested, indicted, prosecuted, or convicted of a crime should not be able to buy a gun if an anonymous bureaucrat in an unnamed agency uses secret criteria to clandestinely place his name on a classified list.

I guess we're now at the point where "punishment for possible suspicion" is acceptable to some.

(Maybe they saw National Lampoon's Animal House and figure on instituting their own version of Double Secret Probation . . . this would be funny if they weren't actually serious about it.)
 
"You can't get on an airplane if you're a terrorist, but you can buy a gun. Which is worse?"
Getting on an airplane, of course - you idiot. You can't bring down the WTC even with the dreaded 50 BMG.


Of course, several of the 9-11 hijackers were said to have already been on a terrorist watch list, but nothing was done to stop them from getting on the plane.

The govt lets the horse out of the barn, closes the door, and then starts beating up on the milk cow ... :rolleyes:
 
It also calls for discretion on the part of the seller. In my shop, I reserve the right to tell anyone no sale. If I am uncomfortable, they can buy elsewhere. I think that doing away with sales to registered aliens would be a start.
 
What ever happened to the concept of innocent until proven guilty?
What ever happened to the concept of no denial of rights without due process of law?

Seems like the first step on a very slippery slope.
Nope. We're way past the first step.

The govt lets the horse out of the barn, closes the door, and then starts beating up on the milk cow ...
Now that's a great line!

It also calls for discretion on the part of the seller. In my shop, I reserve the right to tell anyone no sale. If I am uncomfortable, they can buy elsewhere.
But it is illegal for them to tell you that your customer is on a watch list of suspected terrorists.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., who requested the audit, reacted with a call to undo a year-old law that requires the FBI to destroy records of applications to purchase guns within 24 hours of approval.
No, the law has been around since the beginning of the Brady Act. It was only recently that it became policy to obey it.

Lautenberg also wrote Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and asked whether he thinks terrorism suspects should be barred from legal gun purchases.
What he want's is to stop any gun ownership that he can.

How exactly does a person get on such a list? How and why was Kennedy on that list?
Sorry, that's classified. He's a threat to the American way of life and to passengers in his car.
 
This story is really trying my patience so forgive the yelling...

FBI suggests Congress ban gun sales to terrorism suspects

BEING ON A TERRORISM WATCHLIST DOES NOT MAKE YOU A "SUSPECT" ... YOU MUST BE A "SUSPECT" IN A SPECIFIC ACT OF TERRORISM TO MAKE YOU A "SUSPECT"


It doesn't require any evidence other then some bureaucrat feels that you might be remotely connected to someone who themselves might be remotely connected to an organization that might be remotely connected to "terrorism" (a word thats definition can change on the whim of said bureaucrat).

In America we don't (or at lease we shouldn't) eliminate one's constitutional rights based on something so flimsy.
 
*Further Anger and Disdain*

My buddy in Minnesota actually called me in a huff to tell me about this one today. Gotta say, I find it disconcerting. Are we sure, though, that there's no way to find out if you're on one of these lists? I thought the FOIA required them to release records about people if those people made a formal request.
 
The watch list, called the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File, is the FBI's clearinghouse for thousands of people of interest to the government, from true terrorism suspects and associates to their relatives, neighbors or co-workers.

And apparently anyone who makes the list for whatever reason will not be able to buy a firearm. No appeal, no nothing ... :cuss:
 
The watch list, called the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File, is the FBI's clearinghouse for thousands of people of interest to the government, from true terrorism suspects and associates to their relatives, neighbors or co-workers.

Great, so my neighbor three doors down, his kid pulls a John Walker Lindh and I get put on a watch list because he cut my grass for a couple of years ??? How about my co-worker in another department who immigrated from a scary part of the world, but because his 2nd cousin with the same name is running around with OBL, that gets me put a on watch list.

If your on the list pick them up, question them and file charges or deport them, if there's enough evidence. If not take 'em off the list.

I distinctly remember the howls of indignation about Nixon's "Enemies List".......


Don't even get me started on the whole "Persons of Interest" thing. They're either a suspect or a witness. PERIOD.
 
That is especially strange advice from the FBI, especially when you consider that:

-fugitives from justice may not purchase firearms
-those currently on trial for many crimes may not purchase firearms
-those convincted of a wide range of crimes may not purchase firearms
-illegal aliens may not purchase firearms

How can someone be suspected of terrorism without belonging to one of the above groups? This sounds like another McCarthy era blacklist. I'm glad im not a muslim or an arab, but I still think this isnt right.
 
Yep illegals cannot buy guns. But if your state issues them drivers licenses how can we know that they're illegal? The 9/11 hijackers all had legal driver's licenses, multiples in several states. I really don't want to explain to the ATF why I sold a gun that is used in a terror atack. Although I doubt that any sleepers would even buy guns as that would put them under scrutiny.
 
Zundfogle

From the news item:

after an audit found that 47 people on a terrorism watch list were approved for purchases last year

The question is what does it take to make the list? If the list and the rules to get on it are secret we have a large problem.

Lists were a big part of the "management system" in the former Soviet Union IIRC.

S-
 
Peter Hamm, spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said current policies "benefit terrorists and benefit criminals."

So now we're all "terrorists" and "criminals" to these gun-confiscation extremists.

Scarily close to the "class enemy" rhetoric that the Communists use.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top