gendoikari87
member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2010
- Messages
- 49
again take a look at the data on the link. It's very simple science people. Easy to understand, and even calculate.
The initial problem with the THV ammunition was its high cost. It was then discovered that pressures were frequently too high, and that barrel wear was much faster than usual. What finally killed it off seems to have been a change in US legislation which prevented export to the USA, the target market. SFM subsequently closed down.
Isn't this the same person who couldn't pick ammo for his new Ruger mkIII 22/45, and was going to stoke it with THV for defensive purposes?
I think that at pistol velocity and on typical pistol targets the velocity matters more than the shape. I have wondered whether a round ball with low sectional density and little bearing surface might not do well in the high velocity camp.
Gendoikari87, if you want to experiment with lightweight high-velocity bullets, have you considered casting bullets from tin?
In 9mm for example, a mould designed to cast 100-gr lead bullets will drop tin bullets weighing approximately 65 grains. Tin is perfectly legal, and casting bullets would be a heckuva lot easier/faster than turning them on a lathe.
Personally, I would feel a bit nervous about the THV's poor penetration - not even six inches in tissue simulant - while the experts recommend a minimum of 12 inches. Are you so worried about your neighbors' safety that you are willing to sacrifice your own chances for survival?
He began by developing a bullet capable of penetrating steel plate, glass and bullet-proof jackets while keeping the effective range short. Initial experiments were in 9mm Parabellum and the THV loading in this calibre was taken as the starting point. Tests showed that the blunt 'THV type 2' point flattened on impact, so a sharper point was used, together with a sharper shoulder. To retain good feeding, this was then fitted with a rounded plastic nose cap. Ironically, this meant that the bullet point had to be made blunt again, to retain the cap. At this stage the South African Police became interested and adopted the round; cartridge headstamps indicate that it has been in service since 1991. It is sometimes known as the 'monsap' cartridge (MONad + South African Police).
I have no idea what that means. But, I do think you're far too wrapped up in the theory. How does this translate to the real world, in actual living human tissue? Even the common test medium in use, ballistic gelatin, is still only theory. And will those light, oddly shaped bullets feed in an autoloading firearm action? (This is a common problem with existing frangible ammunition, which also uses light/fast for the caliber bullets.) The "baddest" bullet in the world will do no good hung up on a feed ramp.2 fold, the first is simple physics (or more like simple Calculus) if you take the bullet traveling forward you can find the acceleration of the air outward as a function of the curvature of the bullet and the forward velocity, once you find the function for the acceleration of the air outward you can simply take the integral from tip to the edge of the curve and voila you have the velocity of the air.