First 22 pistol for 7yr old

Status
Not open for further replies.

larryw

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
1,656
Location
Eagle, ID
Today at the range, my 7 year old son showed serious interest in learning to shoot a pistol. I'm guessing that's because he's become pretty good with his 22 rifle and wants to expand his skill set.

So now the search begins for his first pistol (22LR). I'm leaning towards a revolver.

His hands are a bit small for my Ruger Mk II; he can hold it fine but his trigger finger is a tad too short for proper trigger pull.

Any suggestions on a good, small pistol for a young shooter?

thanks,
Larry
 
Little Ruger single action

How about a little Ruger single action. Is Bearcat correct. The Single Sixes also seem small.

I think the single action would teach him to shoot instead of spraying bullets.

My first .22 rifle was a 77/22. I think it made me a better shot than getting a 10/22.

There are also other less expensive single actions from another company that CDNN Investments sells.

Just have him be very aware of muzzle discipline when loading and unloading. That is your job.
 
Handgun for 7 yr old

Flame away, if you like, but I think 7 years of age is to young for handguns - just my opinion, and I've been wrong before!
 
Ya' mean you didn't start him out on the TRP with some +P loads? ;)

I'm not sure you'll find one that will fit him very well today but keep in mind that very soon, he will grow into your guns.

Then you can start tweaking the sights when he shoots your guns so he doesn't think he can outshoot you since his eyes will be better than yours :evil:
 
Thanks for the suggestions. Bearcat was my first thought as well, but I welcome other thoughts.

Bob, generally I tend to agree with you. However, my son has really impressed me with his gun handling and safety awareness. He's become a safer, more responsible shooter than many of the adults that frequent the ranges we shoot at. He's very mature and has a tremendous amount of self discipline for a seven year old, but he's still only seven. That said, he never shoots (he has a single shot Henry Mini-Bolt that's his pride and joy), or even touches a gun unless I am in arm's reach.

So, for the next several years, our time at the range will be with him the only one shooting and me watching every move like a hawk. Can't think of a better way to spend a couple hours on a Saturday afternoon with my best buddy. Just part of being a responsible parent who wants to raise his son right. :)

(Kruzer, I don't think he's ready for the FTF/FTE drills that are part of my regular experience with that TRP paper weight.)
 
I agree that a revolver would be best for safety reasons. A double-action design might be better because of the swing-out cylinder that can be quickly checked to see if it's loaded or not. Both S&W and Taurus make small-frame models that would meet your needs. Given careful supervision at all times your youngster should do fine.
 
First thing I would do is be absolutely sure that your 7 year old is ready to handle a pistol...it is much harder for a child to be careless with a rifle, it is easy to keep it downrange, and a lot harder to shoot yourself with one...

But assuming you have taken this into account...Has he tried a buckmark on for size? I think the grip is a little smaller and narrower than the ruger...I may be mistaken, it has been a while since I have handled one. I personally have a ruger 22/45 polymer frame 1911 style grip, and I am almost sure that would be a bit too big also.
 
My two cents: seven years old may be fine for a BB gun, but a rifle (.22) is pushing the limits, and that's just too young for a handgun. I know that lots of folks have done it, and I understand the "intense supervision" thing, but it still worries me.
 
I also agree strongly, that seven years old is way too young to be handling a handgun on a regular basis.
There is just too much room for error with that short barrel. Talk him into having all the fun he wants with his .22 rifle under direct supervision until he's a few years older.
Now, if your dead set on allowing him to proceed with the handgun idea, I would also vote for the Ruger Bearcat.
A single action takes longer to cock, shoot and reload allowing time for the youngest of shooters to "settle down" between strings.
NO seven year old is ready for a semi-auto yet. I don't care how responsible the parent may feel he/she is. It's an accident waiting to happen. :(
 
Your headed in the right direction. A single action .22LR is the ticket for a beginner. Ruger (without a doubt) makes the best but if your thinking that he may grow out of the small bearcat quickly or that the Single Six is too costly you might check out the Herratige .22s'. You will plunk down less cash for a starter gun.
Seven years old is not to young to start training a kid about handgun safety. My kids all started in that age range or younger. The .22LR ruled supreme but they each wanted to try my big .44mag too. With my hands wrapped around theirs they were thrilled when "they" touched it off.
Only one of my four kids was more concerned with putting lead down range instead of hitting the target, but then shooting was not his thing. He was more there because it was a family event. The others love the the outings to the range. Keep up the good work. Every minute you spend with your kid is great.
 
How about an original Bearcat? Alloy frame, 17 ounces.

Don't pay any mind to the naysayers. They haven't even met your son - or you for that matter.

John
 
I taught my son to shoot when he was very young and I'm paying for it now. He shoots better than me.

After the handgun came the car. I had him driving, on dirt roads off the beaten track, at 12 years old. He followed instructions and listened to directions.

In both cases, he asked to learn and wasn't forced to do anything that he didn't want to do. Unless I deemed it not suitable and/or unsafe.

My daughter followed soon thereafter. Guess she saw her brother having all the fun.

Both are now young adults. My son graduated from college majoring in computer science and my daughter is head teller at a bank.
 
Looking at things from a safety point of view, I'd have to go with the K-22 folks; a revolver that has a swing-out cylinder can be made safe instantly, and he and you can both check it at the same time when it's open. Add close supervision, and you've got the beginnings of a lifetime of fun.
(PS. make sure your teaching of responsibility DOESN'T stop with firearms; that same attitude will carry over into every other facet of his life, if you start him off right.)
 
First of all to address the real question of the post, I'd say a Ruger Mark II would be great... he'd have to learn two handed stances first until he is big enough to work one handed but nothing wrong with that. Other good ones include the P22, which is smaller than the RUger, grip wise, and alot lighter. Unfortunately, even with the longer 5" barrel and compensator, it kicks. Put some clay putty in the brrel extension area to give it more weight. The S&W 41 is at teh other end, being heavier than the Ruger but its solid it nearly indestructable as far as being behind on maintenance. All have easy tear downs. Clearing the RUger is a pain though, some I'd be more inclined with teh P22 or S&W, since they more resemble modern autoloaders.

Now, what's the bull**** about 7 year olds shouldn't be shooting pistols? What kind of bullcrap is that? I say if your son is disciplined enough by your judgement to work with a pistol, then by God, teach teh youngster. You'll never know when it might come back to save you. (see American Handgunner March/April '03)

I was shooting pistols and rifles when I was 7 and 8 years old. By 12, my father and I were the top doubles team on Maelstrom AFB for the duration of the time we lived there. I am currently a member of my school's pistol team and only the team captain is a better shot in international pistol competition. In IDPA style shooting, I clean his clock. I didn't get this good by having a father who shyed away from teaching me the basics of firearms, especially autoloaders and rifles, seeing as how those were teh two weapons in the house at the time. When I was 10 and older, my father, then in the Navy, worked long hours and my mother went to night school for college. That left me and my brother alone. He fully expected me to be able to operate his .45 and know how to shoot. I didn't shoot a shotgun until I was 13 and a revolver until I was 16. WHy? We didn't have those weapons and my father instructed me that revolvers, being more simplistic to operate, didn't need much training to understand how to use. Since my mother got her .38spl, I learned and became proficient with its use. The shotgun that my father now owns? Well, I'm a firm believer that if you need practice with a shotgun after mastering the rifle, something is seriously wrong with you.

larryw, teach your son how to shoot an autoloader. Sure, its more challenging and more difficult, but he and you both will reap the benefits of that training later on.
 
How about a Taurus PT-22? Great little gun. Accurate when you get used to the sight picture, but naturally it's tiny size does not promote bullseye accuracy. Better for him as he'll have to practice more. He could handle one of these with no problem, and when he's older and bigger and tires of it, it'll make a good BUG for you.:D

I would normally agree that a seven year old is pretty young for a firearm, but you know your son better than anyone.
 
First 22 pistol for a 7 yr old

No reason to send him off into the world unarmed - once you teach him proper sight allignment and trigger control.

Does he carry a traditional lunch box to school? or a backpack/bookbag? The Bearcat is the perfect gun for the little fellow to carry in his lunch box, it'll tuck in nicely between the thermos and the peanut butter sandwich. Another good choice for lunchbox carry is the small S&W 617, at 8 shots it's got what he might need if fending off a pack of grade school gang bangers trying to rip off his milk money. If he's carrying a backpack any of the larger Ruger's or S&W's should work.

Seriously, the Bearcat would be my first choice - only because buying S&W products is something I won't do.
 
Jebus Crisp, I never even SHOT a .22lr rifle until I was about 12 or 13.

Don't you think it's best you start him out on air rifles or something of that nature? That's what I first got when I was about 10. He's only 7, I hope you're supervising him. I know how nutty little kids can get with guns. I used to be one :cool: . I also had a friend of mine shot with an air rifle by another little punk back when I was a young punk :cool:
 
Forget all those saying don't do it. If you feel your son is ready to shoot a handgun and you are ready to teach him and to be responsible then go right ahead. I shot my first gun ever when I was only 5 and it was a S&W 422 and I still have that gun. My dad was right there making sure I was being safe and nothing bad ever happened.

The only problem that I have with DA/SA revolvers is that the DA is typically very heavy and he might not have the strength to do it, but if you want to start him off doing SA only with it that works. I enjoyed my first .22 handgun and I am sure he will to not matter what you get him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top