First Rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.
A few things to consider:
1. Don't believe everything some dude in a store tells you (no offense gun store workers). While many are honest, several dishonest and a few in a weird brackishness of mixed honesty, the fact remains that 7mag is more expensive and the guy who sells you the rifle might also sell you the ammo. See a reason for his suggestion developing here? When I was younger and less gun-wise I got a 300wsm on a guy's suggestion. Turns out I love it and most definitely prefer the short actions to the longer action of the 300 mag i was looking for at the time. I got lucky in that, but I still find myself thinking "man those 300 mags sure are cheaper." So think about that. Just to complete the story, I've heard the same guy in later years raving about how the 300 mag was the best thing ever. It's just a sale to him.
2. a lot has been said about rifles and I believe more has been said of scopes. Don't make the same mistake I did on my first rifle and forget about the all important mounting hardware. It's every bit as important as rifle and scope because neither is any good without something decent holding the two together. I guess I should do like most on here and suggest what I have, and that would be (for my factory rifles) the dednutz gamereaper one piece system. What you choose is up to you, of course, and that's the way it should be. But don't leave that factor out.
3. I don't know if this calls for its own number, but some rifles limit your mounting options. For instance, a lot of newer rugers come with rings and as far as I understand it those are the only rings that fit their rifles. Good news: you get rings at no added cost. Bad news, you didn't choose them and may not like them. To replace them guess where you have to go? Ruger. They aren't the only company that does that but they ARE the only one that comes to mind. (it's 2am)
4. Whatever you get, if it doesn't hold zero, don't start cussing and trash the scope. some scope mounts shoot loose. It doesn't seem to be a brand specific problem either. Sometimes on a single mounting system a few of the screws will be perfect and some will vibrate themselves loose. It's not a common problem but it happens. (of all my scoped rifles only one has ever done that and it was a military rifle with the whole scout-style mount deal) Calm down, get some blue thread locker, and try it that way.
It's your rifle (or it will be) and it's your scope (prostaff) but many of us, when we first got into the bolt rifle scene, didn't ever stop to think about ammo affordability (get a 308) or scope mounting hardware.
 
Thanks courtgreene, you raised some good points about the mounting hardware, I will also take a closer look at that. I was also thinking of mounting a bi-pod to whatever rifle i choose at some point as well.
 
I second courtgreene's recommendation of mount. The GameReaper is a good system at an affordable price...kinda ugly (IMO), but it works.

:)
 
and by ugly, he means beautiful. just trying to clarify, because sometimes things get lost in dialect. (kidding of course)
 
Remington ADL vs Savage Edge

Hey guys I have not been here in a while but I checked out some rifles at Dicks the other day. They have a Remington ADL with a laminate wood stock and factory scope "on sale" for $599 and a Savage Edge with a camo synthetic stock and factory scope for $399. Both are in 30-06.

Overall I like the look and feel of the Remington and the scope has more horizontal lines across it for longer distance shots. The Savage is very lightweight, maybe too light weight but the finish looked a little better than the Remington. I heard that remington has a reputation for poor quality finish, I don't know this first hand but have read about it a number of times here. The scope on the Savage was nothing too fancy but seemed pretty clear to me. I liked the price of the Savage better ofcoarse but want to get other opinions on these 2 spacific rifles before I decide on one. On whichever I choose I will probably stick with the factory scope for now but am open to upgrading them later on. I appreacate all of the suggestions on optics as well that I have gotten so far.
 
I hope this post is not considered a hyjack,but I just bought a 22-250 a few days ago and now I'm seeing on several website that they seem not to be a real popular round and I'd like to know why so many don't prefer it.

Not picking on you,Dee. This is my first rifle so I know next to nothing. And I have only been shooting about 4 or 5 months(revolver).
 
I hope this post is not considered a hyjack,but I just bought a 22-250 a few days ago and now I'm seeing on several website that they seem not to be a real popular round and I'd like to know why so many don't prefer it.

Not picking on you,Dee. This is my first rifle so I know next to nothing. And I have only been shooting about 4 or 5 months(revolver).

The .22-250 is mostly a varmint/predator round. In many States it is not legal to hunt bigger game like deer with the .22-250. The .22-250 at 1 time was pretty much THE quintessential varmint round. Now that ARs are all the rage though, the .223 has become extremely popular, which translates into being cheaper. The .22-250 is not light years ahead of the .223 in performance, so the economy of the .223 has made it more popular and thus more guns are chambered for it.
 
First rifle? Only one choice - a bolt action 22.

Learn to shoot without having to deal with the distraction of recoil and with ammo you can afford to practice with. Once you've mastered trigger control, positions, breath control, etc, you'll be ready for a centerfire rifle and you will be able to pay for with the money you saved on ammo. You'll also end up with a 22 in the deal, which is pretty much a must have item.

When the time comes, take a good look at the Marlin XS/XL 7. Hard to beat for the money.
 
So there is no function/reliability/accuracy issue? I was looking for a long range target caliber and this outfit seemed to be about what would fill that. Also,I think I got a great deal. Looked too good to pass up.
 
Well if I get the Savage that will leave a few hundred for a .22 which is another thing I considered, maybe get them both at the same time. A lot of .22's were in the $150-$300 range it seemed.
 
So there is no function/reliability/accuracy issue? I was looking for a long range target caliber and this outfit seemed to be about what would fill that. Also,I think I got a great deal. Looked too good to pass up.

no, .22-250 is a great small caliber round. You won't see it in many extreme range competitions though, because the lighter bullets it shoots are subject to more wind drift. Up to ~400 yards it is a tack driver though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top