Posted: 8:59 p.m. Sunday, June 17, 2012
NRA goes after Florida sheriffs candidates with survey:
The NRA’s Florida lobbyist Marion Hammer sent a survey on behalf of the NRA and the United Sportsmen of Florida, whom she also represents, to sheriffs candidates around the state for the first time ever earlier this month. The questions, which critics say are lopsided, involve often controversial issues such as the state’s Stand Your Ground law and the sheriffs’ opposition to an “open carry” bill.
The survey, "exerpts"
Questionnaire excerpts, the following is an example of the survey which I took from the.Palm Beach Post.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/nra-goes-after-florida-sheriffs-candidates-with-su/nPXj3/
— In 2005, the Florida Legislature codified common law into statutory law and passed “Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground” legislation to protect the rights of victims. Now, anti-gun agitators, who oppose self-defense, are working to destroy the freedom and rights of innocent victims in favor of protecting criminals.
Do you agree that no victim of crime should be required to surrender his life, health, safety, personal dignity, autonomy, or property to a criminal, nor should a victim be required to retreat in the face of attack from any place he or she has a right to be?
a. ___ Yes, I believe the “Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground” is appropriate and victims have a right to fight back without a duty to retreat.
b. ___ No, I oppose the “Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground” and believe victims should surrender to criminals or retreat to avoid fighting back.
— It is a growing practice of some sheriffs and their deputies to travel to Tallahassee during legislative session to lobby against Second Amendment issues and the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Some even make those trips using official vehicles, while officially on duty and lobby in their official uniforms.
A. Do you believe it is appropriate for a sheriff to lobby or use deputies and/or their deputies to lobby against the Second Amendment rights of the law-abiding citizens they are sworn to serve?
a. ___ No, I would not do it and I would not allow it.
b. ___ Yes, I think it’s appropriate.
B. Do you believe it is appropriate for a sheriff or any of his deputies or employees to lobby on issues against the constitutional rights of law-abiding firearms owners , in the name of the Sheriff, Sheriffs department or any Organization or Association in any official law enforcement capacity.
a. ___ No, I would not allow it. Our duty is to respect and serve our community and uphold the law and the Constitution.
b. ___Yes, I would allow it if it makes things more convenient for law enforcement.
— During the 2011 legislative session, legislation was introduced to protect concealed weapons/firearms (CW) license holders against harassment, persecution and prosecution, if — in the course of carrying concealed — a firearm was accidentally, inadvertently or unintentionally exposed to public view or if the imprint of a firearm was recognized by a law enforcement officer.
The legislation was opposed by anti-gun Sheriffs, so the legislation was modified to protect CW license holders if a firearm was briefly exposed, with a caveat that if the harassment continued, new legislation would be pursued. Unfortunately, the harassment and prosecutions continue and the definition of “briefly” is in dispute.
Do you support allowing law-abiding persons licensed by the state to carry a concealed firearm to also carry openly?
a. ___ Yes, I support open carry by CW license holders as a means to stop harassment by those anti-gun law enforcement officers.
b. ___ No, I oppose open carry by CW license holders
Apparantlly the NRA, will back those who they approve of, along with their millions of voters. A non answer will be considered a negative against that sherriff, What do you guys think of this.
I personally approve of it, we should know where our chief Law enforcement officers stand.
Although a general question,if it should be in legal, I apoligize in advance.
NRA goes after Florida sheriffs candidates with survey:
The NRA’s Florida lobbyist Marion Hammer sent a survey on behalf of the NRA and the United Sportsmen of Florida, whom she also represents, to sheriffs candidates around the state for the first time ever earlier this month. The questions, which critics say are lopsided, involve often controversial issues such as the state’s Stand Your Ground law and the sheriffs’ opposition to an “open carry” bill.
The survey, "exerpts"
Questionnaire excerpts, the following is an example of the survey which I took from the.Palm Beach Post.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/nra-goes-after-florida-sheriffs-candidates-with-su/nPXj3/
— In 2005, the Florida Legislature codified common law into statutory law and passed “Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground” legislation to protect the rights of victims. Now, anti-gun agitators, who oppose self-defense, are working to destroy the freedom and rights of innocent victims in favor of protecting criminals.
Do you agree that no victim of crime should be required to surrender his life, health, safety, personal dignity, autonomy, or property to a criminal, nor should a victim be required to retreat in the face of attack from any place he or she has a right to be?
a. ___ Yes, I believe the “Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground” is appropriate and victims have a right to fight back without a duty to retreat.
b. ___ No, I oppose the “Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground” and believe victims should surrender to criminals or retreat to avoid fighting back.
— It is a growing practice of some sheriffs and their deputies to travel to Tallahassee during legislative session to lobby against Second Amendment issues and the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Some even make those trips using official vehicles, while officially on duty and lobby in their official uniforms.
A. Do you believe it is appropriate for a sheriff to lobby or use deputies and/or their deputies to lobby against the Second Amendment rights of the law-abiding citizens they are sworn to serve?
a. ___ No, I would not do it and I would not allow it.
b. ___ Yes, I think it’s appropriate.
B. Do you believe it is appropriate for a sheriff or any of his deputies or employees to lobby on issues against the constitutional rights of law-abiding firearms owners , in the name of the Sheriff, Sheriffs department or any Organization or Association in any official law enforcement capacity.
a. ___ No, I would not allow it. Our duty is to respect and serve our community and uphold the law and the Constitution.
b. ___Yes, I would allow it if it makes things more convenient for law enforcement.
— During the 2011 legislative session, legislation was introduced to protect concealed weapons/firearms (CW) license holders against harassment, persecution and prosecution, if — in the course of carrying concealed — a firearm was accidentally, inadvertently or unintentionally exposed to public view or if the imprint of a firearm was recognized by a law enforcement officer.
The legislation was opposed by anti-gun Sheriffs, so the legislation was modified to protect CW license holders if a firearm was briefly exposed, with a caveat that if the harassment continued, new legislation would be pursued. Unfortunately, the harassment and prosecutions continue and the definition of “briefly” is in dispute.
Do you support allowing law-abiding persons licensed by the state to carry a concealed firearm to also carry openly?
a. ___ Yes, I support open carry by CW license holders as a means to stop harassment by those anti-gun law enforcement officers.
b. ___ No, I oppose open carry by CW license holders
Apparantlly the NRA, will back those who they approve of, along with their millions of voters. A non answer will be considered a negative against that sherriff, What do you guys think of this.
I personally approve of it, we should know where our chief Law enforcement officers stand.
Although a general question,if it should be in legal, I apoligize in advance.