Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

flash suppressor

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Stebalo, Sep 18, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stebalo

    Stebalo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    312
    Location:
    Texas
    Anyone have a comparison photo of a rifle being fired at night with and without a flash suppressor? I keep hearing people saying that with the AWB gone, people can snipe out windows at night with a flash suppressor and no one will ever know where the gunfire is coming from. Never mind the fact that a suppressor is in fact a legal attachment provided there aren't more than 1 other 'deadly' attachments on the weapon.
     
  2. RavenVT100

    RavenVT100 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,107
    I would love to have such a photo myself, just so I could show people the difference.

    I would also argue that a flash suppressor makes it more obvious that the flash is indeed coming from a firearm. With the flash pattern that most suppressors cause, there is no mistaking the flash for anything other than a firearm.
     
  3. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    The purpose of a flash suppressor is not to make the flash invisible to the target (which is impossible) but to reduce the flash blinding of the shooter. It's a flash "suppressor," not a flash "eliminator."
     
  4. Brett Bellmore

    Brett Bellmore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    Capac, Michigan
    How could anyone think a flash suppressor would suppress the flash as seen by the target, or people near it? The thing DOES need to have a hole in it, after all. :rolleyes:
     
  5. stevelyn

    stevelyn Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,290
    Location:
    Fairbanksan in Aleutian Hell
    Any military veteran who has ever participated in a nighttime live fire excercise can tell you flash supressors do not supress much flash. If nothing else they create a distinct flash signature.
     
  6. Librarian

    Librarian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,465
    Location:
    Concord, CA
  7. C96

    C96 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    419
    Location:
    Mid-Willamette Valley Oregon
    The flash suppressors seem to work by breaking up the cloud of burning gases.
    The military M16 one does an OK job, the four pronged one by SA IIRC does
    a better job. Dillon used to sell the four pronged one.

    Now that "normal" AR's are allowed in many places it would seem to be not too
    difficult to do a comparison. I compared my preban to my son's various AWB
    versions. It depends on the ammo, the barrel lenght and the ambient light
    but they do make some difference. But they do not make you invisible like
    the author of one newspaper article stated. :(

    allan
     
  8. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,491
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    Diane Feinstein, in almost every anti-gun speech she made in support of the AWB, stated that the sole purpose of the evil flash suppressor was to hide the location of a shooter as he murdered other human beings ...

    Most of us know what they're really for, let's stop reassuring each other that we all know what they're for; we need to instead start educating the media NOW. The sheer volume of stupidity as far as what firearms are capable of or what their purpose is according to the media and the anti-gun movement needs to be countered.
     
  9. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    Unfortunately, not enough of "us" know what they're for.

    I wandered into my local gun shop the day the AWB ended, just as a local TV news crew was interviewing the owner about the ban. He had a pre-ban upper in his hand, and was in the midst of explaining to the news hounds that the flash "hider" was to conceal the shooter from the enemy during night engagements.

    I didn't want to make him look like an idiot in front of the news hounds, but I did take him aside after they left and gave him a good talking to. The notion that the purpose was to prevent (or reduce) night blindness on the part of the shooter was a totally foreign concept to him, and this is someone who really should have known.
     
  10. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,491
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    (heavy sigh)

    ... and then there are the folks who REALLY should have known ...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page