Mosin77
Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
- Messages
- 1,768
For home defense purposes, I wonder if it’s not better to just turn on the regular room lights, if that is an option?
I live in a relatively normal house in a quiet suburb. Lately I’ve been thinking I need a weapon light, because well, light is good. If there’s a bump in the night I need to identify the target since I will be liable for any shot fired, etc etc. I think we often think of SWAT officers hitting a drug den where they are capitalizing on surprise or really have no control over lighting, or soldiers clearing a dim house in Bagdahd with few windows, etc. But if we have control over the lights, and know (because it’s our own home) that turning on the lights is safe and they’re not booby-trapped, wouldn’t turning them on provide better illumination than any portable light? Also seems like it would be something of a notice for criminals that someone’s home and responding to the threat, and that clearing out would be a very good idea. Admittedly one would lose the “advantage of surprise,” but again, in a home defense scenario, it seems like it would be better to give a bit of warning and give them the chance to run?
I think most of us would have have no moral qualms about shooting and stopping anyone who broke into our homes, and in my state I don’t have an obligation to run, either, but I can’t help but think the scenario is a little different than the “night combat” with WMLs as typically imagined.
Obviously if you are a cop entering a dark alley, or live on a farm and the main concern is investigating that noise near the chicken coop, a WML is undeniably applicable.
I welcome any thoughts here. Maybe there is something I am not thinking of?
I live in a relatively normal house in a quiet suburb. Lately I’ve been thinking I need a weapon light, because well, light is good. If there’s a bump in the night I need to identify the target since I will be liable for any shot fired, etc etc. I think we often think of SWAT officers hitting a drug den where they are capitalizing on surprise or really have no control over lighting, or soldiers clearing a dim house in Bagdahd with few windows, etc. But if we have control over the lights, and know (because it’s our own home) that turning on the lights is safe and they’re not booby-trapped, wouldn’t turning them on provide better illumination than any portable light? Also seems like it would be something of a notice for criminals that someone’s home and responding to the threat, and that clearing out would be a very good idea. Admittedly one would lose the “advantage of surprise,” but again, in a home defense scenario, it seems like it would be better to give a bit of warning and give them the chance to run?
I think most of us would have have no moral qualms about shooting and stopping anyone who broke into our homes, and in my state I don’t have an obligation to run, either, but I can’t help but think the scenario is a little different than the “night combat” with WMLs as typically imagined.
Obviously if you are a cop entering a dark alley, or live on a farm and the main concern is investigating that noise near the chicken coop, a WML is undeniably applicable.
I welcome any thoughts here. Maybe there is something I am not thinking of?