Florida Election Machines Hit by Virus

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flyboy

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
1,888
Location
Oklahoma City, OK
Paging Jim March...Jim March, please pick up the white courtesy phone...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/17/sarasota_county_network_breached/
Slammer turns Florida election result into worm food
Breached server takes down evoting machines
By Dan Goodin in San Francisco → More by this author
Published Thursday 17th May 2007 00:31 GMT
Research library - All papers free to download.

New concerns about the accuracy of electronic voting in Sarasota County, Florida are being raised after a published report documented how the county's main database system came under attack from a virulent worm. The county server was breached on the first day of early voting in the 2006 election, which included a now-disputed race for a seat in the US House of Representatives.

The attack code was a variant of the infamous Slammer worm that penetrated the county's server, which unbelievably, was missing five years worth of security patches, according to an article painstakingly reported by investigative journalist Brad Friedman. The breach crippled the county's entire network, including the electronic voting system, where net connectivity was disrupted for two hours. Those trying to vote during the outage were turned away.

The worm breached the database server's firewall and overwrote the system's administrative passwords. The server then "sent traffic to other database servers on the Internet, and the traffic generated by the infected server rendered the firewall unavailable," according to a two-page incident report unearthed by Friedman. A network security specialist who helped draft the report said he believed the harm to the county's election systems was limited to the two-hour disruption, because the two networks were not connected. (The specialist conceded that the timing of the attack, on the first day of early voting, "would make somebody raise an eyebrow" in suspecting the election system was being targeted.)

The revelations are the latest to call into question the accuracy of Sarasota County's election system, which relies in large part on evoting machines supplied by a company called Election Systems & Software (ES&S). An article last week on Wired News said that incident reports filed by poll workers following the November election reported that many voters suffered from symptoms of a previously known software flaw with the company's iVotronic voting machine. (Similar problems also appeared during a primary election two months earlier, Wired said.)

The concern over the accuracy of evoting in Sarasota County might seem like the hand wringing of luddites were it not for improbable results in the race for Florida's 13th Congressional district. Republican Vern Buchanan edged out Democrat Christine Jennings by just 369 votes. More than 18,000 ballots recorded no vote in the race, an "undervote" rate that was about nine times higher than other races. Jennings is contesting the results in court.

Election officials have claimed that the known bug played no role in election results and say there's no evidence the worm breach compromised electronic voting. Maybe so, but the lack of transparency is breathtaking.

The officials withheld a letter they received from ES&S warning of a bug in its touch-screen machines from document demands issued by attorneys working the case. And Sarasota Supervisor of Elections Kathy Dent didn't utter a peep about the worm intrusion in a state-mandated "Conduct of Election" report, signed on November 18.

Free and open elections, without which democracy isn't possible, demand a fearless pursuit of the truth, something that appears to be in short supply in Sarasota. ®
 
Well... I believe the software is Windows based.... so what did they expect?

IMO, the best choice for voting machines would be OpenBSD with a Gnome based GUI.
 
What? Nothing to see here... move along. You voted for whomever we say you voted for...
 
Well... I believe the software is Windows based.... so what did they expect?

IMO, the best choice for voting machines would be OpenBSD with a Gnome based GUI.

Gnome seems a little overkill, don'tcha think? If its just a voting machine, you wouldn't need a full on desktop environment, just a simple window manager. Hell, twm, with the actual voting application done in gtk (or even xlib) would do just fine.
 
That's true.

I like the Gnome development tools though. :p

but yeah, anything simple would work.... and Gnome would probably eat up too many resources.... might skew the hardware requirements.
 
well I live in Alachua County, in the lovely sunshine state and we use
SCANTRON!
the perfect way to use both electronic scoring with a paper hardcopy, that's why schools use them.
So why are we the only county to use it? :scrutiny:
 
IMO, the best choice for voting machines would be OpenBSD with a Gnome based GUI.
This isn't a problem of operating systems or gui's at all. What happened here ws, on some level, due to poor systems administation. A bsd sytem and applications that are 4 years behind on security updates is just as vulnerable as a windows system thats 4 years behind on security updates. Too many people think that an open source OS is the solution to all the problems.

On a higher level, we will regret our current implementation of electronic voting, hopefully it will be on a small scale.
 
Hrmmm. I'm a KDE fan, so any more off-topic "my WM is better than yours" posts will invoke my ire, though I'll claim it's off-topicness.

And no, I don't need the "Gnome isn't a window manager" speech, mkay?

:D
 
IMO, the best choice for voting machines would be OpenBSD with a Gnome based GUI.
Use embedded Warp that the ATMs use. Rock solid.

Seriously though, even if true didn't Crist just sign a bill taking us back to paper ballots? This kind of stuff shoudn't be repeated right?
 
Use embedded Warp that the ATMs use. Rock solid.
I'm gonna let that slide because OS/2 doesn't use a WM in the same sense that Unix does, and OS/2 rocked back in the day. Having said that, back to the topic please?
 
Vote fraud goes high-tech in Florida? Are they still doing it the old fashioned way in Chicago?
 
I think, in this case, Hanlon's Razor applies:

Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence.

I doubt that the lack of patches was deliberate, more likely that some overworked government slug either forgot, due to his workload (yeah, I was a sysadmin once), or couldn't get anybody to sign off on the necessary patches (mmmm...bureaucracy).

As for the networking, well, that's gross incompetence, but, hey, that's government for you.
 
I like the idea of scantron. I am not as computer literate as some of you but I feel that we should just do it the old fashioned way and take it more seriously then we are now. The Florida election scams were very shameful and made us look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world.
 
Foreign elections monitors are adamant that the benefit of paper ballots isn't that they're bullet-proof, but that they're MORE difficult to fraud, and they leave more evidence when they do. And they're WELL KNOWN. All the ways of cheating are known, and they're thus always looked for. They are not that slow, not that labour intensive, and there is no reason to change from them except to increase the amount of fraud.
 
I like the idea of scantron. I am not as computer literate as some of you but I feel that we should just do it the old fashioned way and take it more seriously then we are now. The Florida election scams were very shameful and made us look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world.
I agree with paper only. I think the Canadians have the best system possible, technology be damned.
 
In all honesty, I couldn't care less if it took two weeks to vote... In the first week , actual legal voters could come to the polls, have their voting status verified, and their votes cast. Any voters disqualified could have time to challenge their disqualifications. In the second week the poll workers could count the votes, using chalkmarks on a blackboard if necessary. I'd rather have the system slow but honest than fast but easily subverted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top