Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
IMO, it is all a matter of personal preference... FMJ's will do the job nicely if you shoot where you need to shoot no matter the caliber... JHP's are USUALLY a better choice but results in smaller calibers are not consistent as there may or may not be adequate energy to expand the bullet... Personally, I would go with FMJ's in 380s or less but if I go with JHP, I would choose the Critical defense rounds... from what I have seen they have better consistency in their expansion.
I think some previous post referred to it as a "dutch" load.
JHP and FMJ alternating in my .40 (though I know this is for smaller guns, you can do the same)
I don't doubt my ability to keep on COM if I fail to stop the threat with the first shot, and I will get through with something eventually. (even if they're wearing a magical Bulletproof Down jacket)
Some people have mentioned using Fiocchi in .32acp because it is supposedly hotter. I recently shot a box through my PPK, in magazines rotating through Fiocchi, Aguila, Prvi Partizan, and S&B. The Fiocchi rounds produced clearly less recoil and noise than the others, shot lower, and suffered a number of FTFs. I'm pretty suspicious of the stuff now.
OBTW, the Fiocchis also produced by far the least soot on the ejected casings, but I don't know that that means anything.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.