FN sues Ruger over trademark infringement

Slater

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
1,384
Location
AZ
Are people really going to be confused over this?

"FN accuses Ruger of using a mark – “SFAR” – that is pronounced similarly to “SCAR” and used in connection with directly competing firearms. FN alleges that this action by Ruger is likely to cause confusion among consumers, leading them to believe there is some affiliation or association between Ruger’s products and FN’s “SCAR” branded firearms. The complaint details Ruger’s alleged intentional violations, including marketing efforts that leverage the “SFAR” mark without reference to Ruger, potentially trading upon FN’s established goodwill."

 
Somewhere, in Spain, I imagine there's a guy who owns the intellectual or trademark rights to STAR Firearms. I'll bet he's thinking "I can make a buck off those Belgians". :rofl:
If only they didnt go bankrupt 30yrs ago.
 
If only they didnt go bankrupt 30yrs ago.
On May 27, 1997 both Star and Astra closed their doors, and were placed in the Spanish equivalent of Chapter Seven bankruptcy, under the control of a Basque regional judge. Eventually, an agreement was reached that settled sufficient outstanding debt, and allowed some of the machinery and the intellectual property to be resurrected in two new companies. Much machinery was also sold at auction to pay debtors. Apparently all unassembled or unsold barrels and frames were destroyed by government order when the company closed. Unregistered parts were retained and purchased by a custom smithing operation known as Ipar Guns.
Star and Astra combined into one company under the ASTAR name, with a new factory, which manufactures a range of new firearms with distribution in Spain and some South American countries.


Colt and Remington Arms filed for bankruptcy too.
 
really? Ruger has a long history of coping others work.
Sure do.
So does S&W, Glock, Beretta, FN and a ton of others. There isn't anything illegal about "copying" once patents have expired.

But this FN lawsuit isn't claiming patent infringement......its about trademark infringement and unfair and deceptive trade practices.
 
really? Ruger has a long history of coping others work.

True, but not in this case. The 2 rifles are completely different. The SCAR is an AR15 variant chambered in 223/5.56 and similar cartridges. The Ruger SFAR is a smaller framed AR10 variant chambered in 308 and 6.5CM.

The only slight similarity is in the names but even then, most people when referring to the SCAR say it as one word. When most people refer to the SFAR they separate the letters and call it a S-F-A-R. It's an acronym for Small Frame Autoloading Rifle. It's a smaller framed AR-10. In size it splits the difference between the AR-15 and traditional AR-10's.

SCAR is an acronym for Special Operation Forces Combat Assault Rifle.

In this case I don't see how anyone could possibly confuse the 2.
 
Ruger SFAR (Small Frame Autoloading Rifle) is a 7.62 NATO caliber ArmaLite derived rifle about the size of an AR-15 and smaller than the AR-10 7.62 NATO caliber rifle. It is distinctly an ArmaLite styled rifle and does not look like a FN SCAR.

Fabrique Nationale SCAR (Special operations Combat Assault Rifle) comes in 5.56 NATO and an FN SCAR-H (heavy) model in 7.62 NATO. The unique Fabrique Nationale looks nothing like an AR-15, AR-10 or SFAR rifle or like any other ArmaLite design rifle.
 
Back
Top