sturmgewehr
Member
I've been eyeballing the FNP-45 for some time. I'm a fan of the .45 ACP cartridge and I'm also a long time fan and shooter of 1911 pistols. I always like to try out other designs now and than to see how they compare (in my hands) to the 1911.
Most recently I picked up a FNP-45. I know they've earned a hit or miss reputation for reliability, at least on the FN Forums. Despite this concern, I bought one from a local dealer after spending plenty of time handling it, eyeballing it and talking myself into it.
What I like:
Before I get to what I don't like, here's a video of my first real shooting session with the pistol. I did fire 200 rounds out of it the day I bought it at an indoor range just to see how it grouped and to get a feel for the controls. That weekend (a week ago) I took the pistol to my range with 400 rounds of ammo to give it a proper workout and to see exactly how it would handle as a defensive arm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGoKe7isbW8
Now, for what I don't like:
I know the negatives list seems long, but in the end I really like the pistol. While it jumps around more than a 1911, the recoil impulse is certainly more stout, it is still quite manageable. I wouldn't want to use it in competition, but for defensive work with practice it works just fine.
Here's the second half of my 1,200 round test. I continued to practice getting used to the heavy double action pull (each time the first shot is fired double action).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T35y3H6Sic
One more thing... something I didn't add to the negatives but perhaps I should have. The FNP-45 is very sensitive to how it's held. If you have a tendency to induce "limp wrist" malfunctions on other pistols such as the Glock, you will have a similar problem with the FNP-45. Here's a quick demo of what I'm talking about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1t4WMcs_7c
Most recently I picked up a FNP-45. I know they've earned a hit or miss reputation for reliability, at least on the FN Forums. Despite this concern, I bought one from a local dealer after spending plenty of time handling it, eyeballing it and talking myself into it.
What I like:
- - The grip angle is similar to the 1911 so it points in a familiar way.
- - It holds 14 rounds with a standard magazine and 15 with the extended baseplate, gotta love 15 rounds of .45!
- - Appears to be very well made. The fit and finish on my sample are on par with HK or Sig (Germany).
- - Ambi-controls. Everything is ambidextrous; slide stop, safety, decocker and mag release. This is the first truly ambi-45 I've ever owned.
- - I like the location of the controls, they are logically laid out and easy to reach.
Before I get to what I don't like, here's a video of my first real shooting session with the pistol. I did fire 200 rounds out of it the day I bought it at an indoor range just to see how it grouped and to get a feel for the controls. That weekend (a week ago) I took the pistol to my range with 400 rounds of ammo to give it a proper workout and to see exactly how it would handle as a defensive arm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGoKe7isbW8
Now, for what I don't like:
- - It's big. I mean it's freaking huge. It's a chore to conceal which is a nice segue to my next point...
- - Finding a holster is a chore too. There are a few out there, VERY few, to choose from. I bought the shooters pack which came with a Blade Tech holster. I've also ordered a Kirkpatrick custom holster which is 6 weeks out.
- - The double action trigger pull is very heavy. I've been spoiled by my Kahrs I suppose... but the pull is long and very heavy making a first shot hit from the holster more challenging. I really have to concentrate whereas with a 1911 or even Glock I don't have to concentrate as much on trigger control for a quick first round hit.
- - No night sights... I don't believe they're even an option right now. I have a hard time using a gun for carry that doesn't have them, but I can forgive this for the time being.
- - Not very positive ejection. It seems to gently toss the empties to the side, sometimes straight back at you. Watching other shooters on YouTube with various FNP's... it seems to be normal behavior. I like a more positive ejection that gets the spent casing well away from the gun and shooter.
- - Safety lever doesn't have a positive detent like that of a 1911 for cocked and locked carry. It could be a little more positive.
I know the negatives list seems long, but in the end I really like the pistol. While it jumps around more than a 1911, the recoil impulse is certainly more stout, it is still quite manageable. I wouldn't want to use it in competition, but for defensive work with practice it works just fine.
Here's the second half of my 1,200 round test. I continued to practice getting used to the heavy double action pull (each time the first shot is fired double action).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T35y3H6Sic
One more thing... something I didn't add to the negatives but perhaps I should have. The FNP-45 is very sensitive to how it's held. If you have a tendency to induce "limp wrist" malfunctions on other pistols such as the Glock, you will have a similar problem with the FNP-45. Here's a quick demo of what I'm talking about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1t4WMcs_7c