FNP9-M vs. Other 9mms

Status
Not open for further replies.

b92fan

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
1
I'm in the market for a new 9mm and leaning toward the FN9-M.

How does the FN9-M compare to the Sig 229, HK USP Compact, and CZ P-01?

Which of these would you buy?

Also, what are the substantive differences between the two FN9-M's in the two attachments, other than the trigger guards? Are both versions available in the States?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • pix4204091938.jpg
    pix4204091938.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 965
  • FN Herstal FNP9-M.jpg
    FN Herstal FNP9-M.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 1,029
I've also wondered what the difference is with the rails. I like the one on the left (with the rounded trigger guard) better.

Personally, even though I haven't had any experience with the FNP9, I trust FN and like their products. I believe it at least merits a test drive, if you can find a place that rents one.

Wes
 
I went to FN Herstal's website and looked at the pistol you have pictured on the right. At the bottom of the page it states this pistol is not available for the US market and then says "Please go to the FNHUSA website." But that site is under construction. However, the statement that the pistol is not available for the US market, may have been due to the AWB, and may no longer be accurate.


http://www.fnherstal.com/


I own a FN Hi-Power and a FN BDAO and both are very well made pistols.


nero
 
Fnp 9

Hey,
I just bought one of these at the local gun shop ther other day. It came with three 16 round mags and cost just under 450 out the door.
I have not put a lot of rounds through it yet but I have been impressed so far. The weapon feels very light and seems to be a natural choice for ccw. It fits my hand very well as it is. It comes with two different back straps and I tried both. The rounded one more naturally fits the hand.
As I said earlier I have not put a lot of rounds through it yet but I have had it out in the yard to see how accurately I could fire it. I didn't take the time to set up paper targets and record every shot. I did how ever have a few clay pidgeons laying up against my normal range backstop. I went out approx 17 to 20 yards. With out fail I was able to distroy the clays one by one never pulling the trigger more than once per clay. The wepaon points well and with little felt recoil is easy to keep on target. I like it and I look forward to giving it some more range time.
I need to find a concealed carry holster for it.. Let me know if any one finds anything..

I also own a XD in 45 GAP and a CZ40. The FNP is the third pistol to be added to my collection and though I will not say that it is better than either of the other two I will say that there will be times and situations where the FNP will be preferred.
Thanks for reading and good luck..
 
The gun on the right is for export only as that is the requirement of FN Herstal; it has nothing to do with the AWB.
My information is that the one on the right is 1/2" shorter than the standard FNP-9. The handgrip is shorter also. The rail in front has been incorported into the dust cover like the gun on the left. The picture on the right is probably of an early version.

lawson4
 
Well, your looking at nice hardware. They are all about the same size and capacity. Poly guns are not lighter for the most part over alloy framed guns so weight would be the same. Id say fondle each, shoot them if you can and make a decision......I dont think you can go wrong with any of them.
Shoot well.......
 
I actually got to fondle one of these about 2 months ago... they are pretty sweet. The numbers in my checking account just aren't there, but I would love to have one of these babies. (Of course, I would rather have the Browning variant, which allows for cocked-and-locked also, if you so prefer...)

If you get a chance, give one a look-see. You might like it.

Wes
 
I love my $350 of great bargain 9mm so much that it has replaced my P228 for carry. The 228 guns are now in the safe, oiled, and just taking up space.

I am beginning to seriously accept the fact of modern machining tools' consistency, and quality to provide an excellent product at a great price. The FN Columbia, SC product is very nice for me.

Also, I am convinced the polygonal vs. conventional rifled barrels have zero difference for accuracy....at least with my shooting abilities.

The FNP9 is a great shooter for reliability, controlability, accuracy, and feel. I like it alot. I have 1,000 through it now of various 9mm. I bought a case a shot it all.

I love the ergonomics. It is the same and better than a P228. It fits my hands very well; left and right. The small profile decocker and slide release may be viewed by some as too small. IN my needs, they are flush to allow the snag-free approach. I also like the hammer.

Forget the SIgma pistols. If you want a bargain polymer gun, dig up an FNP9.
 
Whoa, buddy! Where did you find one of those for $350???

The local gunshop that has one wants $500. :scrutiny: :eek: :scrutiny: (It shouldn't surprise PCRCCW that it is the sister company of Oquirrh Traders. :rolleyes: )

Wes
 
Hey,
I shot the FNP 9 a little more. still very happy with shootabilty and accuracy. I had the girlfriend shooting it too. She did considerably well with it. She shot the XD in 45 GAP one time and handed back to me but she ran several 16 round mags through the FNP 9 and hit what she was aiming at often enough.
I went back to the gun shop looking for a holster. The dealer there insures me that it will fit nicely in holsters made for the Sig 226. He didn't have the holster I was looking for in stock so I'll let you know when the new one comes in.
I have had this pistol apart a few times for cleaning and such. There is one thing that is somewhat interesting on the inside. It seems that the spring does not come off of the guide rod. I have only be exposed to a handful of different autos in which I would have noticed and none of those were set up this way. Any thoughts?
Thanks and good luck..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top