This turned out a bit long winded, but I tried to explain my situation as fully as I know it. Any thoughts/advice/discussion are appreciated.
Two days short of a full six months after submitting my paperwork (Feb 18), today I get an envelope from the ATF. Hmmm...I thought my FAL dealer was to receive the paperwork, not me. Fearing the worst, I tear it open and sure enough it was not my tax stamp. Instead, it is a form indicating (by check box) why my application was denied.
x Improperly taken fingerprints. Carefully follow directions on the back of FD-258 finger print card.
With a handwritten (but obviously a photocopy of the original) note stating "Please complete one (1) new print card [no punctuation] please follow instructions on sample sheet and mail directly back to me AT [his capitalization] ATF ATTN: XX XXXXXXX.
Also handwritten under "Enclosure(s)" at the bottom is:
1 New card
1 old card
the last (?) entry was cut off when the original was photocopied
Argh :banghead:
The prints were taken at the dealer where I purchased the can. Now to be fair, I've got horrible prints. I've got a bit of scarring and just don't print well. To get my CWP required the submission of three sets of prints. That ended up taking quite a while (~3 months) to wait for the state to reject each of the first two in turn. The third was submitted with a letter explaining "this is the best we can do." Apparently in SC, they have to accept the third submission.
So I'm looking for some advice. This afternoon I went to the city police department and paid $10 to have their head guy do my prints on the ATF provided card. He explained the only cards he had were for criminal booking and couldn't do any more sets for me. A really nice guy, he pointed out some smudging in my original prints, letting me look through his glass and explaining technique and such. He also provided me with a signed letter on letterhead which says I [XXX XXXX] came in on this date for prints for civil purpose and that "This office has provided the best available rolled fingerprints." There is a section below which says "Please state any adverse condition(s) that affects the clear quality of this person's fingerprints." Under which he wrote "Missing Deltas/Missing Ridge Detail". I'm not sure why he didn't note the scarring he identified and we talked about (?).
My first thought is to get as many sets of my fingerprints as possible taken and submit the whole lot. A problem is that I only had the one card with the ATF as the addressee. I might be able to get more from my dealer. Unfortunately the NFA guy at the store won't be in for several days for me to talk to. I hope he has some suggestions for me as well. Another problem with the "stack-o-prints" strategy is that the ATF specifically said to resubmit "one (1)" set of prints. A "good" bureaucrat could certainly re-deny me for not following directions.
I have heard rumors that this kind of thing could be a kind of "back at ya" towards SC for some of the things our Governor has done with respect to the Federal Govt.. I don't really know anything about that (factually) really, and it's not like I'm a major political mover and shaker, so I'll just leave that to the big boys and those that do wish to entertain such ideas.
There is no legal reason that I should be denied the tax stamp to put any of that speculation out of mind.
I will certainly photocopy every document I add along the way.
I am tempted to send them a bonus DNA sample barf when I reapply, but I'll try to resist.
Two days short of a full six months after submitting my paperwork (Feb 18), today I get an envelope from the ATF. Hmmm...I thought my FAL dealer was to receive the paperwork, not me. Fearing the worst, I tear it open and sure enough it was not my tax stamp. Instead, it is a form indicating (by check box) why my application was denied.
x Improperly taken fingerprints. Carefully follow directions on the back of FD-258 finger print card.
With a handwritten (but obviously a photocopy of the original) note stating "Please complete one (1) new print card [no punctuation] please follow instructions on sample sheet and mail directly back to me AT [his capitalization] ATF ATTN: XX XXXXXXX.
Also handwritten under "Enclosure(s)" at the bottom is:
1 New card
1 old card
the last (?) entry was cut off when the original was photocopied
Argh :banghead:
The prints were taken at the dealer where I purchased the can. Now to be fair, I've got horrible prints. I've got a bit of scarring and just don't print well. To get my CWP required the submission of three sets of prints. That ended up taking quite a while (~3 months) to wait for the state to reject each of the first two in turn. The third was submitted with a letter explaining "this is the best we can do." Apparently in SC, they have to accept the third submission.
So I'm looking for some advice. This afternoon I went to the city police department and paid $10 to have their head guy do my prints on the ATF provided card. He explained the only cards he had were for criminal booking and couldn't do any more sets for me. A really nice guy, he pointed out some smudging in my original prints, letting me look through his glass and explaining technique and such. He also provided me with a signed letter on letterhead which says I [XXX XXXX] came in on this date for prints for civil purpose and that "This office has provided the best available rolled fingerprints." There is a section below which says "Please state any adverse condition(s) that affects the clear quality of this person's fingerprints." Under which he wrote "Missing Deltas/Missing Ridge Detail". I'm not sure why he didn't note the scarring he identified and we talked about (?).
My first thought is to get as many sets of my fingerprints as possible taken and submit the whole lot. A problem is that I only had the one card with the ATF as the addressee. I might be able to get more from my dealer. Unfortunately the NFA guy at the store won't be in for several days for me to talk to. I hope he has some suggestions for me as well. Another problem with the "stack-o-prints" strategy is that the ATF specifically said to resubmit "one (1)" set of prints. A "good" bureaucrat could certainly re-deny me for not following directions.
I have heard rumors that this kind of thing could be a kind of "back at ya" towards SC for some of the things our Governor has done with respect to the Federal Govt.. I don't really know anything about that (factually) really, and it's not like I'm a major political mover and shaker, so I'll just leave that to the big boys and those that do wish to entertain such ideas.
There is no legal reason that I should be denied the tax stamp to put any of that speculation out of mind.
I will certainly photocopy every document I add along the way.
I am tempted to send them a bonus DNA sample barf when I reapply, but I'll try to resist.