Fox news - Guns and Blogs article

Status
Not open for further replies.

#shooter

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2006
Messages
606
Location
Indiana
Thought people would like to read this.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,260492,00.html

Gun Enthusiasts Mobilize in Blogosphere in New Era For Grassroots

Friday , March 23, 2007
By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos

WASHINGTON —
A massive and seemingly mobilized online community has sprung among gun rights advocates readying for any possible action by the Democratic-led Congress to limit an individual's right to bear arms.

While activity on gun issues has been light in recent years — no Million Mom march or action to renew the assault weapons ban that expired two years ago — an explosion of activity among Web loggers shows Second Amendment purists are anything but complacent with the new majority.

"Blogging is sort of like a gun store, you get a whole bunch of guys around the store, really just to talk," said Gunner Miller, who runs the No Quarters Web site. "It has a swarm effect — if we see a problem, we all start swarming on it."

Nobody knows that better than Jim Zumbo, a well-known outdoorsman with a 40-year relationship with the National Rifle Association. Zumbo recently lost his weekly television program on the Outdoor Channel, his decades-long gig as hunting editor for the magazine Outdoor Life and many of his big-name sponsors, including Remington Arms Co., for which he was a spokesman, in a matter of days over comments he made on his personal blog about so-called assault weapons.

On Feb. 16, Zumbo wrote on his blog, which has since been shut down, that the use of AK and AR semiautomatic rifles, which he called assault rifles according to the definition set forth in the 1994 assault weapons ban, has no place in American hunting.

"I'll go so far as to call them 'terrorist' rifles," he wrote. "Let's divorce ourselves from them. I say game departments should ban them from the prairies and woods."

The response was swift and sure across the blogosphere, and despite Zumbo’s subsequent apologies, he is now considered something of a pariah. Gun rights advocates say Zumbo's comments could easily be used by gun control campaigns to question the credibility of gun ownership and advance efforts to renew the assault weapons ban.

Any comments that might indicate a split in the gun rights ranks needs to be rectified quickly, bloggers say.

"The amazing thing about Zumbo was, he posted it on Friday night and by Monday there was a mushroom cloud," said Jeff, a gun-rights advocate who runs GunLawNews.org and did not want to be identified by his full name. "I think it teaches a lesson to those who are listening that the power of the Net should not be underestimated."

Jeff Soyer, who runs the popular Alphecca.com, said he avoided the original "dust-up" over Zumbo and was sorry Zumbo's career is now in tatters.

"I think it was an overreaction considering Zumbo's apologetic statements afterwards," he said.

Blogging, the NRA and the 110th Congress

The NRA, which claims 4 million members and 20 million "who say the NRA speaks for them," for years has been tapping into the energy of the online network by cultivating its own blogs and e-mail lists.

"We certainly have a comprehensive online strategy to deal with the ever-changing landscape and ever-changing election strategy," said the organization's chief lobbyist, Chris Cox. He said the number of e-mail addresses on its list is in the "seven-figure range."

Bloggers and the NRA are taking credit for the August 2006 signing of the "Emergency Powers Protection Act" by Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco. The bill, which would prevent the confiscation of legal firearms from law-abiding citizens in an emergency, was spurred in part by reaction to images and stories of police in New Orleans taking away guns in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

A similar bill, the "Disaster Recovery Personal Protection" measure, was signed by President Bush in October.

The pro-gun blogosphere has also been ablaze in the wake of the March 8 federal appeals court ruling against a 30-year-old handgun ban in Washington — one of two U.S. cities, the other Chicago, that has such a ban. The ruling is being appealed, but Republican lawmakers gummed up a Thursday vote in the House on D.C. voting rights when they tried to include a repeal of the ban in the legislation.

While Cox said the NRA is able to "update our members in real time" on legislative alerts and other perceived threats to their cause, some bloggers say their online network has allowed them to report stories even faster.

"Blogs covering gun rights provide the same immediacy of coverage and action as others do that cover more general politics," said Soyer. "Blogs are on the story as it happens."

Miller suggests that blogs have evolved to the point that they can go around the NRA hierarchy to communicate with millions of people on their own.

"I think bloggers have diluted the power of the NRA," said Miller. "If I find an atrocity done by my elected official in my state, I don’t have to contact the NRA and tell them to get on it. It can be passed along where it does not have to go through the bottleneck, where the NRA puts its own spin on it."

Cox said, however, that the NRA is at the heart of the grassroots effort. "Both our friends and enemies agree that when it comes to making a difference, when it comes to grassroots activism, no one does it better than the NRA."

Challenges From the Other Side

Dennis Henigan, legal director for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, one of the most recognized gun control groups in the country today, said the last six years of a Republican-controlled Congress and White House, were quiet compared to the Clinton-era campaigns, exemplified in the anti-gun Million Mom March on Washington, D.C., in 2000.

He said he hopes that is about to change.

"This is very much a new day and there are some traditional allies of the gun violence prevention movement in leadership positions right now," Henigan said of the new Democratic majority.

"This Congress will be far more interested in listening to the views of law enforcement and the nation's mayors" on the issue of corrupt gun dealers and black markets, he said.

There is more interest now, in part, because of the recent spike in violent crime throughout the states, Henigan added.

According to figures released by the FBI in December, the first six months of 2006 saw a 9.7 percent increase in robbery, a 1.4 percent increase in murder and a 1.2 percent increase in aggravated assault — a 3.7 percent increase in violent crime overall.

"During the Bush administration, you're seeing more guns and fewer cops," Henigan said.

Last month, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., whose husband was gunned down on a Long Island train in 1993, introduced a new assault weapons ban that many consider broader and more restrictive than the 1994 ban. She failed to get a similar bill through the last Congress.

Though chances for this latest bill aren't much better, it is expected to reinvigorate the debate, said her spokesman, George Burke.

"We are realists here," Burke said, noting that many Democrats elected in the wave of 2006 were from moderate districts and have constituencies that would not be happy about a new assault weapons ban.

However, at the state and local level, gun violence is "certainly a live issue," he said. "There is beginning to be a drum beat."

The pro-gun lobby has pledged to fight any attempt to ban assault weapons. On the other side, Henigan said their activists are lobbying to dismantle current language in the annual Department of Justice appropriations bill that prevents the public sharing of information collected by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms about guns found at crime scenes.

The NRA argues the information compiled by the ATF is often manipulated by outside interests to make a case against guns. Henigan said the information can be useful in research, and in busting corrupt gun dealers.

"There will be a battle over whether the language will stay in the bill," he said.

Henigan said that gun rights advocates are not the only ones making good use of the Internet — his group is pleased with the activity on the Brady Campaign's site, StoptheNRA.com.

On the other hand, Jeff from GunLawNews.org said he is proud that the gun rights activists are able to have so much of an effect, generally, on the debate.

"There are a lot of small-time players," he said of the blogosphere. "But if you total all those up you have a substantial mass and the market looks at that."
 
The monolith of the NRA speaking is one thing.

Most of our enemy's strategies are based around this.

The chorus of independent voices like those here, and the vast multitude silently nodding in agreement is quite another.


They're playing chess vs the NRA, while the rest of us are playing Go vs them.


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • goboard.gif
    goboard.gif
    47.4 KB · Views: 660
Perhaps it is the predator in me :eek: , but I smell fear in the anti's camp.


I think they are shocked that we are mobilized so strongly and unified.

I suppose it won't be long before legislation is rolled out to try to silence the blogs.


John
 
I think the anti's should be worried.

LA riots
9/11 and ensuing concerns/scares
Katrina

People are beginning to understand that at some level, they must provide their own defense, and gun rights are the only viable path for that defense.

the more effectively you can bring the idea that in the event of real catastrophe, they need to be prepared to take care of themselves, the more self-evidence the concern of firearms ownership becomes even to those who are conditioned to surrender their rights to the state.
 
Go Weeds!

Taken in part from my blog entry: on March 8th.

I think blogging and podcasting are fertilizing the grassroots movement of pro-gun community. It's coming at a time when Regular Joe's can produce his own media. We always had the brain power just not the resources to share information as much as the internet has afforded us. I see hope in all this activity. I never understood what the grassroots were till I was a part of it. The WIKIPEDIA calls it a "political movement driven by the constituents of a community". I love, live and like it a lot!

To gun prohibitionist, anti-gunners and politicians we are the weeds that refuse to die. We are grass that comes up in the patio of the elite. As I scan the blogosphere and read the thousands of forums, blogs and polls that go up everyday in support of the right to keep and bear arms I am encouraged.

I have taken a hint from my kids and started a blog and podcast called the Urban Shooter that is cross pollinating better than I ever could as a lone website. While the audiences of most gun shows are graying, the audience of the iPod world is growing like weeds. The target audience and future of the shooting sports is computer savvy, plugged in and discriminating. I am very happy to have so many under 30 year olds to connect to.

I have learned to be content with my lot in life. There were times when I wanted to be a huge organization championing the cause of self reliance and gun ownership. Behind the scenes I have noticed that big things can’t change quickly. Words like bureaucracy, The Machine, and the 800 lb. Gorilla are not synonymous with effectiveness. I am taking the manure fed to me by the establishment, the naysayers and the ignorant to fertilize, cultivate and inspire my replacements in the battle. They will be better, stronger, faster, more diverse and free. This is encouragement to us all who love freedom.

Long live the grassroots.

Go Weeds!
 
I'm not a huge fan of blogs, but I believe in this case it's been a good thing for us. Back in the 70's, 80's and early 90's we were behind the power curve. The anti's had their allies in the media, ensuring that we were shut out, and limiting us to letters, elections and the occasional rally - which recieved no coverage.

It was very difficult to deploy the troops when communications were so difficult. I'm old enough to remember those days (40) and it felt like we were wading through waist deep mud sometimes. Of course it ain't over, far from it. But we do have some new tools in our bag after many years of frustration.

Well back to the war.
 
The thing I love the most about this stuff is that you get it "straight from the horse's mouth". No monolithic organization (be it the NRA or the managed media) gets to put it's own private "whitewash n' spin" job on the information.

Some of what gets presented (by either side) is sickeningly ugly. Well that's reality for ya and it still exists regardless of what the "nanny state" is trying to say. Personally I'd rather know the ugly is out there. I never was a fan of sticking my head in the sand.

:D
 
What I find interesting is that the agents of gun control have always thought gun owners walk lockstep with the NRA and are pawns being used or misguided my the NRA. The NRA of course is accused of walking lockstep with the gun manufacturers. Ergo, pro-gun supporters are manipulated by the gun manufacturers.

What the internet has done (via blogs, forums, newsgroups, and homegrown websites) is to show that gun owners are a diverse group, sophisticated and intelligent, and really do believe in the Second Amendment in and of their own accord. Surprise! Gun owners really disagree with the Brady Bunch (and other gun control groups) for what gun control actually represents and not because the NRA told us to. This, I think, is a big blow to the antis. It is easy to criticize someone who you think is being manipulated and all you need to do is show them the light. It is a whole different matter when you find out they are not being manipulated and pro-gunners are acting independently. The Zumbo incident was a prime example of RKBA independence. Some leftie writers tried to accuse the NRA for being behind what happened to Zumbo, but their version of reality was soon corrected.

Does the internet replace letters and calls to politicians and letters to the editor? I don't think so, I think the internet compliments the grassroot RKBA quite well. We still need troops on the ground so to speak to keep their eyes and ears on local issues like publishing CCW lists and we need the internet to get the word out and organize.
 
"This Congress will be far more interested in listening to the views of law enforcement and the nation's mayors" on the issue of corrupt gun dealers and black markets, he said.

Er...last I checked, Congress was supposed to listen to the views of the people, not the executive or law-enforcement branches of states/cities.

"Well there's your problem."
 
have learned to be content with my lot in life. There were times when I wanted to be a huge organization championing the cause of self reliance and gun ownership. Behind the scenes I have noticed that big things can’t change quickly. Words like bureaucracy, The Machine, and the 800 lb. Gorilla are not synonymous with effectiveness. I am taking the manure fed to me by the establishment, the naysayers and the ignorant to fertilize, cultivate and inspire my replacements in the battle. They will be better, stronger, faster, more diverse and free. This is encouragement to us all who love freedom.

Kenn:
You should contact Kevin Starrett at the Oregon Firearms Federation. He has done more with grassroots activism than most of the "big" name organizations. He has continued to fight while others gave up, and he has won. This legislative session finds him in his biggest fight ever. The Democrats in Oregon are doing their best to raise gun control to new heights, and he is waging a full time battle against them. How? Because he doesn't rely on the largesse of larger organizations, or fear the threats of politicians who consider him "difficult". Check out his website at www.oregonfirearms.org I suspect that you will find that the two of you have a lot in common.
 
every emergency

"proves" to the nannies that people need government.

But the other side of the sword is that every emergency also proves to the people that they need each other and a means of self defense/preservation, and cannot count on the government.

ST

Here's to more emergencies! erm...wait a sec:scrutiny:
 
"This Congress will be far more interested in listening to the views of law enforcement and the nation's mayors" on the issue of corrupt gun dealers and black markets, he said.


Er...last I checked, Congress was supposed to listen to the views of the people, not the executive or law-enforcement branches of states/cities.

"Well there's your problem."



I caught that also. I thought it was pretty crappy when I read it too. One government agency listening to another, instead of thier constituents. :mad:
 
"This Congress will be far more interested in listening to the views of law enforcement and the nation's mayors" on the issue of corrupt gun dealers and black markets, he said.

I'm not bashing law enforcement, BUT if they know about corrupt dealers and black markets, why not do something about it NOW?? :confused: Oh, that's right we need MORE laws BEFORE the current ones can be enforced.:rolleyes:

I liked the article it wasn't slanted either way. I do think the anti's are a little spooked by the Zumbo backlash. One has to draw the line somewhere and with the mounting anti pressure, I'm sorry to say, but you are with us now or you're not. It seems we have allowed our rights to slowly be negotiated away. I'm afraid it's time to step up and put a stop to it. My $0.02
 
I am an NRA life member and all that, and have been involved with a couple of things they have done, but they are definitely a top-down, one-way communications outfit. Sort of reminiscent of "Tell me which way they have gone so I can lead them!"

The world has changed.

They have their place, but their OODA loop is a lot longer and slower than the internet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top