Ga. Reconsiders No-Knock Warrant Rules

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rusher

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
156
Location
Gaston,NC
Ga. Reconsiders No-Knock Warrant Rules

By GREG BLUESTEIN
Associated Press Write

ATLANTA (AP) -- A group of lawmakers wants to make it harder for police to use "no-knock" warrants in the wake of a shootout that left an elderly woman dead after plainclothes officers stormed her home unannounced in a search for drugs.

The measure would allow judges to grant the warrants only if officers can prove a "significant and imminent danger to human life."

The measure was prompted by the Nov. 21 shootout between Kathryn Johnston and three police officers during a no-knock search of her Atlanta home. When the officers entered without warning, police say that Johnston, 92, fired a handgun at them and that the officers returned fire, killing her. An autopsy concluded she was shot five or six times.

Narcotics officers said an informant had claimed there was cocaine in the home, but none was found.

Democratic Sen. Vincent Fort, a sponsor of the bill, said the case was a warning that it has become too easy to obtain "no-knock" warrants.

"Every citizen ought to be safe and secure in their homes," Fort said. "A no-knock warrant should be a special warrant, not a standard. And that's what it's evolved into."

An Associated Press review of all no-knock warrants filed in Atlanta's Fulton County last year found that the authorities involved often give scant detail when applying for the warrants.

No-knock warrants are intended to prevent suspects from getting rid of evidence and to protect officers from violent suspects. They typically are used to search for drugs and weapons.

---

On the Net:

Senate Bill 259: http://www.legis.state.ga.us

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Good for Georgia! All states need to look critically at this practice.

Police safety does NOT supersede citizen safety. They are paid to go in harms way and it is their choice.

The 94 year old woman who was shot and the many others who have been killed did not have the choice. If even one innocent is killed, it's too many. We are way beyond too many.
 
The measure would allow judges to grant the warrants only if officers can prove a "significant and imminent danger to human life."

It is my understanding that the police officers lied in order to get permission to do the raid anyway. If that is the case, then I am not sure this law would have prevented her death, as the officers would have simply lied their way around it.
 
It is my understanding that the police officers lied in order to get permission to do the raid anyway. If that is the case, then I am not sure this law would have prevented her death, as the officers would have simply lied their way around it.
That does indeed appear to be the case, since news reports indicate that one of the cops has rolled on the others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top