Garand: To buy or not to buy

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boomie

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Messages
248
A work buddy has offered to sell me his (Springfield) Garand. It's a mixmaster whose parts are from 1942 - 1945. The stock was damaged and repaired back in the war (only see the damaged part via a hairline seam you really have to look for). Not sure of muzzle or throat erosion but it seems to shoot as good as the other Garands I've shot.

What would be a ballpark fair deal? We don't know and he was thinking $500.
 
i think fair for you,maybe alittle unfair for him, but over all condition will be the deciding factor, i see run of the mill M-1,s from 600-800. eastbank.
 
yes can't go wrong there unless something is wrong with it... then it really depends on what the problem is.

I'd take a shot on a garand like you described for 5 bills.
 
Not sure of muzzle or throat erosion...

Boomie,

Take a .30-06 M2 Ball cartridge, insert the bullet tip into the muzzle, and then measure the distance between where the bullet enters the muzzle and the cartridge neck. The more distance between the muzzle and cartridge neck, the better. 3/16" to 1/4" indicates a good muzzle, which is more important than the wear on the throat.

Don
 
If the barrel is not worn, and if its not a Import and other parts arent worn its a good deal. If its all of the above its only a fair deal
 
Guys who competed in matches with them, and who also have friends on the CMP staff, state that almost every Garand is a "mixmaster".
They were rearsenaled and most have, for example, H&R combined with Springfield components etc.
 
It is likely that the garand will not group. Many less than pristine garands need a lot of tinkering to get decent groups of like say 3 MOA rack grade with ball ammo. This is only to make you aware that some additional work may be needed on your part and not to say you should not buy. If you have fired it and it groups well then at $500 it is a steal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top