Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gas Piston vs Direct Impingement Actions

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Tequila jake, Feb 21, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tequila jake

    Tequila jake Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, TX
    Following is a quote from the Armalite web-site concerning cleanliness of gas piston vs direct impingement actions:

    "There is a debate about which system remains cleanest. The Stoner system tends to leave propellant residue in the receivers, while the Piston systems keep the residue outside the action in the cylinder. Piston driven systems, however, tend to allow more external dirt into the action because of the openings required for various connecting members (operating rod, bolt lugs, etc). Comparison tests of the Stoner and the M-14 before Desert Storm confirmed the superiority of the Stoner system in sand and dust tests"

    Is the last sentence true/correct? I've always heard that gas piston systems are less likely to jam due to fouling vs direct impingement systems.

    Tequila Jake
     
  2. ny32182

    ny32182 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,701
    Location:
    Clemson, SC
    Since the entire top of the M14 action is wide open, it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to say that it is at least possible/plausible with the M14, but just about everything else uses a more closed in receiver/dust cover: FAL, all piston ARs, etc. Even the AK has less moving parts exposure....
     
  3. Tequila jake

    Tequila jake Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, TX
    ny13282,

    Roger--and the various versions of the AK have an outstanding reputation for continuing to function under the worst of conditions. I have fired many hundreds of rounds from AK47s, AKMs, and AK74s and have yet to have one jam on me.....

    Tequila Jake
     
  4. Ian Sean

    Ian Sean Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Messages:
    730
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    On the Israeli variants of the FAL, they did have "sand cuts" in the bolt carrier to offset the effects of that fine desert sand blowing around.

    Don't know of any historical data of any FAL failures in the field, or if these modifications were done "just in case".

    Either way, speaking on behalf of the FAL (which I dearly love) the design lends itself to very quick field cleaning, break open the action, remove top cover-bolt and carrier, and brush/clean out any debris. This could be accomplished in a matter of a minute or two.

    My .02
     
  5. atblis

    atblis Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Messages:
    4,530
    Location:
    Neither here nor there
    See

    See Daewoo K2/Dr200. The original gas piston AR. Very good weapons and oft overlooked (also one of the best folding stocks).
     
  6. jacketch

    jacketch Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2003
    Messages:
    442
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    And I thought the AR-18 was older than the Daewoo:rolleyes:
     
  7. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    I picke up a keltec plr about 6 months ago, I have fired about 600 rounds through it, and i have yet to even wipe down the inside of the receiver, or the oustside of the bolt assy. still super clean.
     
  8. atblis

    atblis Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Messages:
    4,530
    Location:
    Neither here nor there
    Yeah

    Forgot about the AR180. I am thinking the Daewoo resembles an AR more though.
     
  9. Geronimo45

    Geronimo45 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,345
    Location:
    Phoenix, Arizona
    "I've always heard that gas piston systems are less likely to jam due to fouling vs direct impingement systems." The .223 military round, from what I've read, uses an inordinately filthy powder for maximum performance in a cartridge of its size. Don't think that .308 (M14's food) has such a dirty powder in it. Same goes for the AK.

    Then, there's always the chance that the military 'fixed' the tests, to prove that the AR-15 system was the greatest thing of all time.
     
  10. LittleLebowski

    LittleLebowski member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    129
    There is demonstrably more carbon in the bolt and bolt carrier of an AR than on the piston of my FAL.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page