Zaydok Allen
Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 13,274
The last time there was a panic because of a mass shooting, and all the ammo went missing from the shelves, I had enough of a stockpile of target ammo that I was able to shoot all my guns as much as I wanted for the most part. I outlasted the panic. However, in pondering the scarcity of ammo, I found my collection of firearms to be lacking a few chamberings that I think would be good to have on hand so when I can't find one ammo type, I can find another I can shoot. In autoloaders I am almost strictly a .45 shooter at the moment, simply because I favor the recoil characteristics, the solid thump of the round, and I shoot it well.
Every collection needs a 9mm in it though. So for several months I've been debating on different full size 9mm blasters to take to the range and as a serviceable home defense gun. I don't need any more home defense guns, but I have a tendency to make all of my handguns very practical. There is no gun in my collection that I'd call strictly a "range toy".
Anyway, I settled on ordering one of the Wilson Combat/Beretta 92G Brigadier Tacticals that are being produced, and I'm having Wilson do an action tune on it. The reports I'm hearing from folks who have gotten their guns are 99% good.
So, my questions......
I know that 124 gr is the original bullet weight of the 9mm Luger. In fixed sight guns, I like to stick with the original weight as the POI always seems to hit where I intend, and I assume it's because most gun manufacturers use original bullet weights when figuring sight alignment and POI. However, there seems to be a huge proliferation of 115 gr target ammo on the shelves at any given time. So how much lower could I expect to see the POI to be with 115 gr ammo, vs. 124 gr ammo, at say.... 25 yards? Or is it really a small concern? I don't compete or anything, so it's not like it's a hugely critical issue, but I have noticed quite a difference on my 45's. 200 gr ammo hits noticeably lower than 230 gr ammo. I know I need to test the difference myself in my own gun, but I'm just curious what other people have experienced, and typically when I start a thread, I end up learning something I had not even considered. (THR is great)
Question two: I rarely hear anyone talk about reloading 9mm ammo. Is that because it is so cheap? Or is it possibly because the 9mm is a tapered cartridge and makes reloading a little tougher? I don't currently reload, but I have been saving my brass for years, and sorting it with the intention that I will be reloading in the future. I have enough brass that I suspect I'll be shooting nothing but reloads for a few years when I do actually get into it.
I did try a search on this subject, but I like having my own thread to go back to as a reference.
Thanks all.
Every collection needs a 9mm in it though. So for several months I've been debating on different full size 9mm blasters to take to the range and as a serviceable home defense gun. I don't need any more home defense guns, but I have a tendency to make all of my handguns very practical. There is no gun in my collection that I'd call strictly a "range toy".
Anyway, I settled on ordering one of the Wilson Combat/Beretta 92G Brigadier Tacticals that are being produced, and I'm having Wilson do an action tune on it. The reports I'm hearing from folks who have gotten their guns are 99% good.
So, my questions......
I know that 124 gr is the original bullet weight of the 9mm Luger. In fixed sight guns, I like to stick with the original weight as the POI always seems to hit where I intend, and I assume it's because most gun manufacturers use original bullet weights when figuring sight alignment and POI. However, there seems to be a huge proliferation of 115 gr target ammo on the shelves at any given time. So how much lower could I expect to see the POI to be with 115 gr ammo, vs. 124 gr ammo, at say.... 25 yards? Or is it really a small concern? I don't compete or anything, so it's not like it's a hugely critical issue, but I have noticed quite a difference on my 45's. 200 gr ammo hits noticeably lower than 230 gr ammo. I know I need to test the difference myself in my own gun, but I'm just curious what other people have experienced, and typically when I start a thread, I end up learning something I had not even considered. (THR is great)
Question two: I rarely hear anyone talk about reloading 9mm ammo. Is that because it is so cheap? Or is it possibly because the 9mm is a tapered cartridge and makes reloading a little tougher? I don't currently reload, but I have been saving my brass for years, and sorting it with the intention that I will be reloading in the future. I have enough brass that I suspect I'll be shooting nothing but reloads for a few years when I do actually get into it.
I did try a search on this subject, but I like having my own thread to go back to as a reference.
Thanks all.