Glock 26 Gen 4 vs SR9c

[WinThePennant]

The only complaint that I have against the SR9c is its loaded chamber indicator....it's just too much.

The only downside I can see to the Glock would be that it is a little chunkier than the SR9c, however I would pick it over the Ruger. (Just because I have had more trigger time with Glocks)

And, that bothers you in what way? It doesn't interfere with line-of-sight, and is very practical for use at night since you can feel the indicator.

Now... The thumb safety and removable takedown pin are two things that might bother me, but I consider them to be small issues.

 

[allaroundhunter]

And, that bothers you in what way?

It bothers me because of how exaggerated it is. Glocks and XD's have a loaded chamber indicator that can be felt that isn't so large. Again, that is a complaint that I have against the SR9c, others will see it as you do. It's just personal preference, but I know that I am not the only one that doesn't like it.

 

[ForumSurfer]

Both are great. I owned a gen4 26 with about 1000 rounds through it with no issues. Gold dots, Hornady Critical defense, Tula, WWB, federal bulk...all functioned flawlessly. I have a gen4 19 with over 3000 down the pipe...no issues either. I don't care for the thumb safety on the sr9c, but you really can't go wrong with either.