Okay, I have read about this on more than a few occasions. It involves removing the standard coil trigger-reset spring found in the trigger mechanism housing and replacing it with an 8 lb. New York leaf spring (which also houses a pushing coil spring). This causes the cruciform plate to be pushed up, rather than pulled. The other part of the change is replacing the standard 5.5 lb. connector with a 3.5 lb. connector. The story was that if you did this, you would keep the trigger weight at 5.5 lb., while causing the reset to be stronger and preventing failure of the weapon due to breakage of the original pull coil trigger-reset spring. Sounded great. Only problem is that it didn't quite work out for me.
On my Glock 22, I tried it out. What ended up happening is that the cruciform plate was being pushed up so hard that it was resetting prematurely, on its own. It was bypassing the design feature of the regulating connector which acts to keep the cruciform plate down and out of contact with the firing pin tang. By design, the cruciform plate is supposed to stay down, until the groove on the under-side of the slide pushes the projection on top of the connector during cycling. When this happens, the connector is pushed away from the trigger-bar tab and the cruciform plate rises enough to allow the tang of the firing pin to make contact and complete the reset process.
But upon making the modification, the connector was not strong enough to keep the cruciform plate down. It would just pop up on its own, as soon as you let go of the trigger...even if the slide was removed or did not cycle (dry-firing). This made reassembly difficult and made the gun function very poorly...it just didn't work. So I changed it back in short time. In its original configuration, it works perfectly again.
My question is: what were the advocates of this modification talking about? It was nothing short of a disaster for me and I can't believe it ever works. Does anyone have a differing experience? Or how about a similar one? Thanks.
seed.
On my Glock 22, I tried it out. What ended up happening is that the cruciform plate was being pushed up so hard that it was resetting prematurely, on its own. It was bypassing the design feature of the regulating connector which acts to keep the cruciform plate down and out of contact with the firing pin tang. By design, the cruciform plate is supposed to stay down, until the groove on the under-side of the slide pushes the projection on top of the connector during cycling. When this happens, the connector is pushed away from the trigger-bar tab and the cruciform plate rises enough to allow the tang of the firing pin to make contact and complete the reset process.
But upon making the modification, the connector was not strong enough to keep the cruciform plate down. It would just pop up on its own, as soon as you let go of the trigger...even if the slide was removed or did not cycle (dry-firing). This made reassembly difficult and made the gun function very poorly...it just didn't work. So I changed it back in short time. In its original configuration, it works perfectly again.
My question is: what were the advocates of this modification talking about? It was nothing short of a disaster for me and I can't believe it ever works. Does anyone have a differing experience? Or how about a similar one? Thanks.
seed.