good short barrell 357 load

Status
Not open for further replies.

eyz

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2004
Messages
132
I have a Taurus 605 5 shot snub 357 2"bl. I asked federal about the ballistics for their 130gr per def.

2.5" bl
1270 fps
penetration 11 inches
expansion .690
98% retension

recoil is managable and easy enough to shoot with taurus boot grips. i think the snub holds its own to any 9mm +P+, 40, or 45 out of a short bl. what are other good short barrell 357 loads (include data)?
 
That Federal load is fast, but a bit too light in the projectile for my tastes.

I'm partial to the Buffalo Bore 158-grainer. Their website lists chrono velocities in various barrel lengths for you to check out. The guys over at sixgunner.com say they're not exaggerating (as do the gunblast.com guys), so that's good enough for me.
 
I like the lighter loads because the gun is so small. I'm not sure it or I could handle the big loads.
 
Scroll down and look at the Corbon 140gr.'s

http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6045&highlight=140

I ordered a couple of boxes to try out for my 2.5in M66 to chronograph and do some expansion test (water jugs). I think that 1225 FPS is pretty seed for a 140gr bullett. It has good speed coupled with a decent weight. If I did my math right, you should see around 1240 fps out of a 2.5in bbl. I should be able to post a range report with pics in a week or two on these.

Robert.
 
I've shot my buddies 605 using the 125 gr .357's and it wasn't to hard to handle. He loaded it with 158 gr swchp's and handed it back to me .Ouch! I'll stick with the lighter stuff in my snubbies.
 
I tried the cor-bon 140 load this past weekend in my 3" 65-3.Lots of muzzle flash and harsh recoil.It was very accurate at 15 yards.
 
I find 180g XTPs with 13.5g of H110 to be reasonable in my 3" SP101. The extra inch probably helps, and I don't know how it compares to your Taurus in weight.
 
good call reverend, I bought a box of this but have not tried it yet, i like the price and with 50 in a box it seems a good way to practice and carry.
 
Here's some chrony results from my 3" SP101, average of 10 shots.

Federal Personal Defense 130 Grain Hydra Shok Jacketed Hollow Point: 1315 fps
Federal Hydra-Shok 158 Grain Jacketed Hollow Point: 1184 fps
Remington 125 Grain Golden Saber Jacketed Hollow Point: 1215 fps
Speer Gold Dot 158 Grain Jacketed Hollow Point: 1027 fps
Winchester Super-X 125 Grain Jacketed Hollow Point: 1291 fps

The Federal 130gr "Personal Defense" load was by far the most pleasant to shoot with mild recoil and minimal muzzle flip (and what it's loaded with now). Recoil on the Fed 158 was stout with significant muzzle flip. Others were in between.

I haven't tried any 110s in my snubby, but I may chrony some next time I'm working up some 158/180 loads to carry when I'm backpacking/fishing.

I've found the 125-130s easy to shoot (Hogue grip ;) ) and the performance is well known. I was recently blasting some steel with my SP101 and the Federal 130s: I was really impressed by how hard they knocked the poppers over.
 
The one that goes boom. Here's another thread where grown men are actually engaging in (semi)serious conversation about muzzle velocity and flash and accuracy of a snubby to 15 yds. Has anyone here actually used a snubby in an armed confrontation, had to be accurate with a snubby to 15 yrds? Would anyone here be willing to take the chance of a head shot from the front of your house to the back of it, if a BG was using your 12 yr old daughter as a shield, with a snubby, much less a 5" 1911? Gentlemen, IMO, a snubby is designed and meant for up close and within spitting distance and as long as that round goes boom, it'll do it's intended purpose. To speculate that a snubby could/would be used as a target pistol is unrealistic(and possibly irresponsible),IMO. YMMV
 
I must have missed the "target pistol" part also. So i guess nobody in the history of firearms has ever used a snubby for defense?. Well golly gee whiz. Ain't that somethin'?
 
I received my first box of Gold Dot 135gr bullets this week--the ones tuned for performance in snubbies. Speer says they'll perform as intended at around 850 fps (IIRC), but they should hold together well at velocities a hunert or two above that, based on the construction and reputation of the Gold Dots. I handloaded some to about 950 from my 340PD, and am finally satisfied with a carry load for this light gun. It's not really a 357--just a 38 +p+ in a 357 case--but it's accurate; it's controllable; and I'm pretty sure it would do what it's supposed to (expand to stop in the target after penetrating sufficiently) at the velocity I'm launching it. Don't know why I'd want anything faster, really, for anti-personnel PD. If I had to stick with factory ammo, I'd definitely try Speer/CCI's loading of this bullet.

Gene: If you think the whole topic of effective snub ammunition is foolish, please feel free to abstain. The ethos we try to cultivate on the High Road does not include making points by implying that other posters (a.k.a. 'grown men') are childish posers.
 
I feel your tone is inappropriate, Gene, and since it's directed at me (as a poster on this thread), I'd like to invite you to PM me if you have a problem with something I posted. However, if you're just kvetching about a pet peeve, perhaps you shouldn't read the threads that offend you. I feel (as, apparently, a number of other members do) that eyz' question was quite reasonable for "grown men" to discuss on a firearms board.
 
First of all, if someone doesn't feel comfortable shooting snubbies from 15 yards, (I'm not necessarily saying headshots, even those can be done with practice), they should practice more. While not the usual distance for snubby use, it's no big deal.

But, more importantly, I think anyone who carries a short barreled revolver should be very interested in this post since a major problem with the short barrel is getting the bullet up to expanding speed. If the confrontation is up close, all the more reason for good expansion. If he's close, I want him stopped NOW, not 10 minutes after he's killed or wounded me because of a bullett that didn't expand and went clean through. And about that, I sure don't want a bullett I fired hurting anyone other that the intended person by going through, which they will do with much more regularity if they don't expand. Look at the snubby tests on Ammolab.com and you will see that most of the loads look nearly unfired. Very little expansion at all and very deep penetration, too deep in many cases.

This is an excellent thread, excellent topic, for anyone carrying a short barrel revolver. Oh, and by the way, Corbon 110 gr. +p+ for me.
 
I had a Taurus 617 2-incher that could consistently put all shots in a 3 x 5 index card (single-action) with 158 grainers at 25 yards, if I did my part.

Why I sold off that gun I don't know why, but I surely do miss it now.

This nonsense about a belly gun being just for arms-length work is a crock of warm stew. The operator is the limiting factor more cases than not than the instrument he/she/it is trying to perform with.
 
Erich,et al, don't take it so personal, I wasn't directing anything to you.

I see that noone has admitted to actually using a snubby in an armed confrontation.


Yeah, this could be an intersting thread , if there was some actual good info in it.

My problem is someone asks about a round and everyone starts quoting velocities, like that's supposed to mean something. Y'all know where the whole idea of velocities came from , right? And how it's totally irrelevant here. Velocity/bullet study/manipulation came from hunters, specifically, big game hunters and bullet manufacturers use this as sales pitches. What's the difference between game and humans(clothes,phones,wallets,etc)? We need to keep in mind that while that info is good for hunters , 'cause one deer/bear/water buffalo will be just like the next one, but this info cannot carry over to defensive shooting, 'cause humans are completely different. How do they test different bullet function at different velocities anyway? Which leads to mention of penetration, like that's supposed to mean something. Penetration into what, ballistic gelatin, wet phone books, jugs of water(one person mentioned 11", 11" of what?)? L-Frame, you gave a nice explaination of how you want a bullet to expand and not go thru, but failed to acknowledge that penetration in winter, with heavy layers of clothing will be completely different than summer with a single lightweight shirt. When they start giving stats on effects of velocity/bullet combos on clothed cadavers, that'll be good info. "til then how about looking at history? There's alot of stats and history of men who carried snubbies every day in the mean streets. Col Askins ,Col Fairbairn, Bill Jordan has written extensively about snubbies, how they're good from contact to 10', at COM (btw, if you're 15 yds away, you need to exit asap and not engage). Then, as long as you fire several rounds, 99% of the time, you'll stop the fight. They preferred regular SWC, but acknowledged that winter was different than summer, as clothing, etc definitely makes a difference. So, to answer a person who askes what's a good snubbie round, the best anyone could say is, it depends and then we discuss the variables, so that they're informed that they might want to carry this round in summer, so not to over penetrate, but then they might want to carry this other round in fall and winter( depending where they live), to insure penetration. Btw, a warm crock of stew is good comfort food on a cold winter day.:cool:
 
GeneC,

The comment regarding the differences between rounds used in winter and summer was good stuff. I would suggest in the future I would make something like that your first post and avoid some of the venom directed at your "grown men" post.

Also, you are quick to jump on the original question and responses because they are so general and not broken down specifically enough to be of use, but you are more than willing to throw out equally general and useless info. as "snubbies are good from contact to 10'" as gospel and say at 15 yds. you should get away. Great advice but equally useless. There are literally unlimited scenarious where you might have to shoot from 15 yards with or without exit possibilities. Getting away is preferred, but sometimes not possible. I hope people with snubbies don't pay the price for practicing from contact to 10' exclusively because some expert said that is only what they're good for, (just as I hope people don't pay the price for using the same load in all situations; the good point you made).
 
I always get a kick out of those who say "you've never done this or that, so you're not qualified..." Just another intellectually weak tactic usually employed by the left. I can hear it now in a condescending John Kerry voice, "You've never served in the Senate, so you don't know how things are done..." or "You haven't had an armed confrontation with a snubbie..." :rolleyes:
 
So, still no one who'll admit to being in an armed confrontations?

Well, when ya can't dipute the facts, attack the character. Speaking of leftists?

Truly the lives and writings of Col. Askins and Bill Jordan warrants reading, as they were men who were in the military and LE for many, many years and carried snubbies the whole time. They preferred them, but declared those professing "yds" shots was a bunch of hooey. You measure your snubby shots in feet. Col. Askins wrote that sights on a snubby was just plain wrong, as it gave a man the false sense of security that he might try to make a long shot, only to tragically find out how wrong he was, as in the heat of battle, sights on a snubby are useless. That's been proven time and time again, say what you will. This from a combined 70 yrs experience in the field from men who BTDT. Same with this velocity/expansion BS. I'll guarrantee that in the heat of the moment, the round that goes boom is the most valuable one and the round that the 'media' says does this and does that , won't, 'cause of some variable and they'll be the first to admit, "Well of course it fragmented prematurely, it hit his cell phone." or "Of course it didn't penetrate to 11'' like we advertised, he was wearing several layers of shirts, sweaters and a leather jacket and it hit his rib and at that angle..."


Don't kill the messenger.
 
I'll guarrantee that in the heat of the moment, the round that goes boom is the most valuable one

Gene, that's a totally unhelpful statement. Every round I've ever shot does that; and if you're actually trying to say that every round is therefore equally effective, then a thread discussing the comparative values of different snub rounds is obviously a waste of your time. Perhaps you could go back to your extensive library of 30 year old books (back when they didn't have modern hollow points). Yes, I'm being a little inflammatory, but I've read Jordan's book repeatedly, and he was decidedly interested in what came out of his snub--to the point of working with S&W on the technical problems of producing an airweight 22magnum. Why bother, since any round that 'goes boom' will do the (ridiculously) limited job of a snub?

Your requirement of actual shootout experience in order to discuss this topic is ludicrous. Personal experience is not the only path to knowledge--and this particular experience has (thankfully) fallen to very few people in our time. Fortunately, though, we live in a literate society, where information can be passed on from those who do have experience (no, you don't have the only copies), and we have the empirical method to gather and compare data on, e.g., bullet performance.

Please reconsider your attempt to 'veto' any discussion that does not agree with your pet theories. We understand your position, I feel quite sure, and we all feel thoroughly chastened by your brusque superiority. Now please let us foolish boys talk about snub ammunition in our silly way and go do something important.

PS--If your response is to say, again, that poeple are taking something 'too personal', I submit that an alternative explanation is that you have been smug and unhelpful, and thereby shown actual disrespect to their (our) persons.
 
Good Grief! I don't even understand how no one admitting being in an armed confrontation is relevant to anything. What does that have to do with "when you can't dispute the facts" as you put it.

Also, the world is filled with "experts" in all fields with decades of experience who hold totally opposite views on subjects. You will find very qualified, respected men who adhere to the "point shoot" gunfight methods while other equally respected, qualified people preach sighted fire. I don't care. The FACTS of the matter are that YOU CANNOT DICTATE THE SITUATION IN WHICH YOU MAY HAVE TO USE DEADLY FORCE. There are possible situations where you may have to fire at someone with a snubby at 15 yards and when Bill Jordan said they are close quarters guns, I'll bet you my retirement that if Bill Jordan was armed with a snubby, and such a situation arose, he would not have hesitated to use it at that distance, and I'll be my wife's retirement that he would have got the job done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top