good short barrell 357 load

Status
Not open for further replies.
.357 magnum Winchester 110 gr. JHP. Velocity from a 2" barrel is about 1175 fps. I've read that penetration and expansion in bare gelatin is
9"-11" and .60"-.64", respectively. Years ago Winchester recommended this round to me for a 2 1/2" barrel gun. (More than one law enforcement agency used the .38 special +P+ 110 gr. JHP, and it's velocity was less than 1175 from a 4" barrel.)
 
Ahhh...so THIS is what people mean when they say "hijacked thread."

I guess I could go to just about any other thread and make an argument about why it should not exist...but I've got other things to do! Like practice with my snub. Or cut my grass. Or kiss my wife.

Could we please just keep the discussion limited to snubbie ballistics? I just purchased a Smith 340 for pocket carry and am keenly interested in what the community recommends as a reliable factory load. My life may well depend on it.
 
Sure. This is from Steven A. Camp: Hunting Javalina w/Handgun...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
" Hello. If you live in far south Texas or in a southwestern state where javalina can be found and you hunt, you truly owe it to yourself to try taking one or two with a handgun. It is a hoot.

I was fortunate enough to get to hunt on a ranch with a fellow who was a master shot and a tireless reloader, though he worked mainly with Thompson-Center Contenders and Ruger .44 Magnums. (His carry gun was a .45 1911.) It was just north of Edinburg and crawling with javelina (snakes, ticks, fleas, and thorns, too).

These little things get around 30 to 35-lbs I'd estimate, but are tougher than their size would indicate. A .22 magnum might be "enough," but I'd only go for brain shots if using one.

I used 9mm and .45 ACP and my buddies primarily used .45 ACP's. Ammunition used over the years in 9mm included Corbon 124-gr. XTP +P, Corbon 124-gr. GDHP +P, Triton 125-gr. Hi Vel JHP +P, a 124-gr. XTP handloaded to 1244 ft/sec, Corbon 115-gr. JHP +P, and Triton 135-gr. Quik Shoks. In .45 ACP, ammo was Federal 230-gr. HydraShok, 230-gr. Golden Saber, Corbon 165-gr. JHP +P, Corbon 185-gr. JHP +P, Federal "Personal Defense" 165-gr. HydraShok, and Winchester Ranger 230-gr. SXT.



The only load that was consistently lacking was the Federal 165-gr. PD load. For reasons I do not understand, the little "pigs" were never staggered, even with good hits. They'd run when hit and require a second shot. With any and all of the other rounds, a good hit resulted in their at least dropping to the ground for a few seconds before regaining their footing and running a few yards. They are worthy little adversaries.

I'd practice shooting at coffee saucer size targets at 25 to 35 yards. I could almost always ooch around and get that close, often considerably closer. They have a strip right at the shoulder. Put your bullets in the stripe or foreward of it. It looks like it's way too far forward, but trust me, it is not. The vitals are in this area."
 
Like I said, this is just a little 35lb pig. IMO, while all the chrono, penetration and expansion info looks good on paper, it doesn't indicate,respresent or guarantee performance in the field, so I'd take that info with a grain of salt and search for real life performances.

Chris, when I say that any round that goes boom is a good one, I mean that from what I can tell, any one round has just as much chance of doing the job as any another. From what I can gather, I'd say the round that had a very low flash and recoil , so you wouldn't be blinded in low light and could get good follow up shots ('cause hopefully you're not counting on a one shot drop), would be far better than ultimate high velocity, super penetration in gel,etc.
 
I think what GeneC is saying (if so, correctly) is that 148-grain wadcutter is as good as anything (and better than most) out of a two-inch snub.
 
Gene,

I don't think the incident you link to--and helpfully reproduce here--really does anything to advance your argument. Here's why: all the bullets in that comparison are high-performance hollowpoints. You seem to be saying: "Look; none of them dropped these little pigs Dead Right There," and that's apparently true. But it does not follow to say, "Therefore, all bullets perform equally." If Mr. Camp had also chosen to try to shoot a Javelina with a target-loaded 38 wadcutter, and done so repeatedly, and concluded that it performed as well as these other loads, that would have been evidence for your case; but all this data shows is that there is no great difference in performance on Javelinas between high-performance JHPs--not that a JHP is only as good as a knock in the ribs with a small rock. It may also show that Javelinas are tough, or that it is best not to expect ANY handgun bullet to strike like Thor's hammer--both valuable lessons, I'm sure; but not the point that I take it you are trying to infer.

The fact that Mr. Camp did not choose to include a target-loaded wadcutter or another weak-loaded, non-hunting bullet among his loads only shows that he has experience and wisdom (as his great postings have shown us all many times) to recognize that using the best loads available is the right thing to do in a hunting--or, I suspect he would concur, a self-defense--situation.

Anyway, that's how I read it. Thanks for posting it.
 
Chris, whattaya think about Ben Franklin?

Anyway, I did mention that Col Askins and Bill Jordan carried snubbies daily and swore by SWC, but I guess you surmised that that was only because that was all they had at the time, even tho men was taking a knife and hammering an 'X' into rn lead bullets since way back when, but I guess you've decided not accept anything I say. So be it. Have a nice day.
 
I guess you've decided not accept anything I say

Gene, not at all; I'm being argumentative, but only to lay out the grounds of a difference of opinion.

For instance; the SWC load you mention above--which is the first specific load you've brought up, and which I would certainly find preferable to the target-loaded wadcutter in a snub or any other gun--is a perfectly respectable bullet. If my choices in 38 snub ammo were only a little more limited than they actually are, that would be the bullet I'd carry, and I wouldn't feel a bit bad about it. I do think there are other loads out there with some advantages over the straight SWC (e.g., the HPSWC); but the advantages aren't huge, and your most fundamental point has merit, I think: handgun bullets are not a panacaea--even the best handgun bullets are only a little, if any, better than the middle of the pack; and no handgun bullet should be relied on to do the job of a more potent weapon--especially when suffering the velocity (and perhaps accuracy, depending on gun, shooter, and situation) disadvantages of a snubby. Is that a fair synopsis?
 
Chris, yes it is, but you used way too many words and still are relying on velocity as as a standard of performance , which is totally unreliable. Btw, the one statement," If my choices in .38 snub ammo were only a little more limited than they actually are..." kinda makes no sense. For one we're talking about .357 ammo and for another, you're the only one who limits your choices, so it seems like a self inflicted 'problem'. Your synopsis is equal to your synapsis, but that's only my personal opinion. Btw, you didn't respond to your opinion of Ben.
 
Let me see. I suggest revolvers for carry and a stubby lends itself quite well to carry. I own 3. When I moved to the Midwest I was teaching my new wife to shoot with a S&W stubby. One of the good old boys suggested that didn't have much use for them in those parts. Later when she started to shoot bowling pins I had to up the load for her to clear the table. Later as she wanted to compete she graduated to a Dan Wesson 4 inch 357 for the extra 6th shot. When we go to the range to practice she used the stubby as this was her defense pistol. She simply does not like the 158 gr 357's so I am working on a load that will have reduced powder burn and reasonable velocity in the 125 gr. range that wound data shows is a consistent stopper.

All that being said I would not want to be on the receiving end of someone trained to the level above. I can place a good group with a stubby at 25 yards but I can't put it between the eyes of a hostage target. I save that for my DW or match 45. But then my primary purpose is personal protection from some thug not as well trained as me.

Oh for defense they are stuffed with hydrashock .38spl+P for now.
 
Too many words: yes, I've been trained to write like a doink.

Limited choices: if there weren't just a few loads in .38 that I consider better than a SWC, I'd take the SWC and be happy; but your'e right, we're talking .357, so IMO there are quite a few better choices than the SWC.

Ben Franklin: not sure what you're after.
 
Would anyone here be willing to take the chance of a head shot from the front of your house to the back of it, if a BG was using your 12 yr old daughter as a shield, with a snubby, much less a 5" 1911?

What do you mean that a snubbie isn't accurate??
I used to watch Steve McGarret shoot out the tires on fleeing felon's cars,
shoot bad guys off the roof of the Wakikki Hilton from the ground floor, and do all kinds of amazing stuff with that little snubbie!!! :D

BTW, no, I have not had the misfortune of an armed confrontation (almost, but not quite) and I do practice head shots with my snubbie!! ;)
 
Wow was this thread highjacked.

personel experience, I used to shoot a lot of taurus snubbies at the outdoor range at 15 yards. I could shoot a box of ammo into a decent sized ragged hole. The guys next to me would usually just give me funny looks. I can't shoot quite that good anymore because I don't practice as much. But in real life defense hitting the same spot twice is useless as the damage has already been done. As for sights on a snubby, they don't get in the way as they are built in and sometimes quite usefull.

pigs are not people, they are muscular very compact thick skinned little animals that will not stop at pain, they have no mental concept of bullets or anything else.

My original discussion was what are good snubby loads, particulary 357. Velocity drops enough out of two inch barrell to effect performance out of a lot of loads. I like the Winchester 110gr 357 idea, it looks like it would be equivalent to a good 40 or 45 round. A 357 snub is comparable to a 9mm +p+. I'm interested in 38+p. Be specific as to brand and type.
 
So, still no one who'll admit to being in an armed confrontations?

Sorry GeneC, I have read this thread twice and seemed to have missed the situation you were in that makes you such an expert. Oh wait, you wern't in one either? So by your standards what you have to say dosen't matter either.
 
I've been trying to work up a good load for my S&W 66 ported 3" for some time now. My latest try is about 8g Unique under 158g gold dots. Load seems accurate enought but there is a lot of flash. In the meantime, I continue to rely on my old stand-by load of 12g 2400 under a 158g lead SWC. It is manageable and quite accurate (50yd hits on an 8" plate are really "too" easy). I really should just quit and stay with this load but, hey, we ARE gun nuts, aren't we?:D

I also shoot a .38 airweight hammerless (I forget the model number) with the same lead SWC over 3.5g Bullseye. Just yesterday, I was shooting steel "turkey" targets out to 60 yds. The funny thing was that I couldn't knock them over past 50yds and even at 50, they fell over real slow.

No, I have never been in a gunfight - much less with a snubby - but I have never been convinced that you can't hit anything beyond 15yds. You may not stop oncoming Mack trucks but you can score hits. Just practice and have fun!
 
Gungeek, so you read the thread twice and still didn't get my point. Hmmmm. How you transfered me asking if anyone had been in an armed confrontation with a snubby to say that I had and am therefore an expert is, well, unfair to say the least. I asked if anyone had, so that we all could get first hand info. I did offer that Bill Jordan and Col Askins did carry snubbies for many years in LE and wrote extensively about it. I offered their expert info, in lieu of my own. I explained , quite clearly(but I'm sure you read it , since you read the whole thread twice), that it's not fair or accurate to, when someone asks what is a good round, just roll off velocity and expansion statistics, as there are alot of variables and NOONE was discussing that. So, did you have a valid point or did you just get on here to focus on me personally?

Eyez, no this thread was not hijacked, it was interjected with some real info. If you think that info about the pig isn't relative, maybe you should stay on the range, 'cause a 200lb thug jacked up on PCP will be the biggest pig nightmare you ever had. I just pointed out that one should consider different loads in winter , than in summer and IMO, the best rounds are the one's that has lowest flash, 'cause you have a 90% chance of your encounter being in low light, and a round with low recoil, 'cause there's 90% chance you'll need accurate follow up shots. If this isn't the info you feel is useful, then just ignore me, I'm talking to those who do.
Btw, for most places, you're not even allowed to shoot at anyone that's 15 yds (or more) away.

Editted to add: I'm no expert , but I do carry a S&W M66-1 , 2 1/2"bl and I've been studying ballistics since I joined the Marine Corps back in '76. I studied everything I could get my hands on in the 20th century. I studied the FBI ballistics and the absurd "computer man" and Fackler, et al. As anyone who studies ballistics knows, it all falls short. So then I changed my focus to real life incidents and found the info I was looking for, but was quite surprised to find the simplicity and frankly, the direct opposite direction than the so called "experts" were going. Grandpa was right! The bigger the bore, the better. The only way you're gonna shut a man down is to sever his spine or shut down the hydraulics and the latter will still take some time. Clothing, accesories, bone structure,etc DOES make a difference. There IS NO ONE PERFECT ROUND. Sure that high velocity , super expandable round will smash the heck out of a man's rib, but it probably won't stop him(there's been NO evidence that a wound cavity caused by a high velocity round{the whole premise of high velocity, is that it causes an 'explosion' within the wound cavity} has dropped a man). There's numerous accounts of LE firing numerous rounds of 9mm jhp into a suspect (emptying a 15 rd mag amd most of another) and he not stopping and sometimes went on to kill the officer. Col Askins wrote of the effectiveness of the SWC. Why would you want a round to fragment? It hits something solid and it's energy is used up breaking it up. Why not have the energy transferred as one unit , to the target, whether it penetrates or not? If the bullet itself doesn't penetrate and cause wound cavity, the energy will transfer deep within. Most often , the follow up shots determine the outcome.
 
Last edited:
I carry a Colt .38 snubbie as my BUG. I carry it for the possibility that one day my Sig 245 will be either out of ammo, out of commission or out of ammo. I opted for the Federal hydra shock 110 grain 38 load because my department mandates that we carry Federal Hydra Shocks in our handguns. I bought the 110 grain because that is what my local gunshop had for sale. It's an easy round to shoot and I've had pretty good results with it at the 15 yard line. Or was it the bigger Colt DS that gave me better results? I also own a S&W M49 and I find it a much harder weapon to shoot.

I have to confess to being confused about the combat thing that Gene keeps bringing up. I've never had to use my Sig in a real worl incciddent either, but I'm glad that I have it loaded with 230 grain Hydra-shocks.
 
Gungeek, so you read the thread twice and still didn't get my point. Hmmmm. How you transfered me asking if anyone had been in an armed confrontation with a snubby to say that I had and am therefore an expert is, well, unfair to say the least. I asked if anyone had, so that we all could get first hand info. I did offer that Bill Jordan and Col Askins did carry snubbies for many years in LE and wrote extensively about it. I offered their expert info, in lieu of my own. I explained , quite clearly(but I'm sure you read it , since you read the whole thread twice), that it's not fair or accurate to, when someone asks what is a good round, just roll off velocity and expansion statistics, as there are alot of variables and NOONE was discussing that. So, did you have a valid point or did you just get on here to focus on me personally?

GeneC, I'm sorry if it was not your intention, but you seemed to be using that question as a way to invalidate everyones opionion but your own. I don't have a point to add, but I do have a reason to be interested. 2 weeks ago I purchased my first revolver, an .357 2" SP101 that is now playing a large part in my carry rotation. Though I didn't start this thread it's only because the author beat me to it, I am very interested in EVERYONES input in this matter. That is the reason I am reading this thread completly over and over, to gather as much info as I can.

I know from many years of firearm training and experiance that round ballistics isn't everything and shot placement is 100 times more important, but when my life is on the line I want every advantage I can get.

I am not saying you are wrong, just don't shut down everyones elses opionion because you disagree.
 
javelina is best hunted with a minimun of 44mag. 45acp is classic for not penetrating a little javelina. pigs is tough, but this thread ain't about pigs.
a human being regardless of size or medication has a heart 2 inches behind the breast bone. therefore an energy dump 2-6 inches after entry is required.


now back on track, the best i've seen is federal personal def 357 mag should give about 450+ ft lbs energy out of a 2" barrell. the winchester 110gr just under 400. what about some real world 158gr and 180gr stats.
 
Gungeek, having an opinion shut down'd be in the eyes of the beholder, not my problem. You're exactly the candidate of my point. You just recently got a snubby and want to know what'd be a good defensive round and you're intensively reading the thread to glean info. You're reading about alot of statistics on ammo and are surmising (until you read my posts) it must be all about velocity and expansion. These veterans know better but for some reason don't start this thread by describing what exactly a good defensive round is, or at least, good for what? For instance, in reality, you're twice as likely to need to worry about the shots you shoot and miss, than the ones you shoot and hit, but you're not reading that in this thread (except here). Even the guy who started the thread acknowledges that the heart is 2" behind the breast plate and therefore a bullet that dumps it's energy 2-6" beyond penetration is needed (even though I've already stated that there's only a few ways to stop a man, with dropping him on the spot being almost pure luck, most likely by severing the spinal cord, which'd most likely be a shot in the neck. Then there's by 'draining his hydraulics' by hitting a major artery or the heart, but he's still a threat for some time and can still kill you. Another good way is for the BG to go unconscious.), but unless you're shooting at a naked BG, there's still the issue of clothing, jewelry, cell phones, etc to contend with, that only one or two're addressing, unless they're convinced that the ultra high velocity DOES address that, but higher velocity exponentially increases your liability should you miss the BG and it goes thru the wall and out into public, or goes thru the Bg and into other people, which noone has mentioned(except here). My suggestion, read up on Col. Askins and Bill Jordan, et al. These guys carried snubbies for many, many years and had many, many confrontations and have written extensively on snubbies. Statistically you're confrontation will be in low light and at contact distance and from what everyone(should) know, it's highly unlikely you'll drop a BG with one shot, so you need a round that has low flash and controllable recoil and not so high velocity, so you won't be blinded and can do numerous followup shots (which will most likely drop the BG) and decreases your liabilty should you miss. I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade, I just want this topic to be fair and balanced.
 
Eyz, that load should work well if:

1. It gets that velocity out of YOUR gun.
2. It is accuratue in YOUR gun.

I prefer 158 gold dots at 1250 myself, but I'm running them a little heavier and sronger gun than yours.

You might want to get access to a chrono and try several loads for velocity. Then try them for accuracy. When you find one that has enough of both with accecptable blast/recoil, then do some rough penetration/expansion tests with that load.

Remember, you life may depend on it, so don't skimp on your range time finding a good load.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top