Got a reply from the ATF about pistol to rifle interchangabilities

Status
Not open for further replies.
TC can advise that because they went to the Supreme Court over it in the 1990s. That is part of the problem here. ATF is interpreting that Supreme Court decision as applying only to the Thompson Contender firearm. The same set of facts with a different firearm? Illegal according to ATF.
 
TC can advise that because they went to the Supreme Court over it in the 1990s. That is part of the problem here. ATF is interpreting that Supreme Court decision as applying only to the Thompson Contender firearm. The same set of facts with a different firearm? Illegal according to ATF.
Could anyone post a link to where exactly the supreme court exempted the regular carbine or pistol as opposed to the kit? If possible please cite by copying and pasting the exact words in the case that exempt the regular pistol or carbine from interchangabilty back and forth.
 
Conclusion by the court "Accordingly, we conclude that the Contender pistol and carbine kit when packaged together by Thompson/Center have not been "made" into a short-barreled rifle for purposes of the NFA. 10 The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore Affirmed. "

Ok, so TC won the right to package a contender pistol or carbine kit.
The case was based on constructive intent. Parts in a box do not equal
a short barrel rifle. That was obvious.

What part exempts the end user from arrest if he chooses to assemble the pistol (not the kit) into a carbine and then back into a pistol?

Please point out the exact phrases that exempt this.

I have asked two lawyers I know to spot just this and neither could render the exemption clause that I keep hearing is present.
 
None of this makes any sense until you realize that HANDGUNS were originally included in the NFA of ’34 but were removed due to public pressure. All sorts of quirky provisions aimed at preventing you from converting a rifle into a handgun remained in the bill and became law.
 
None of this makes any sense until you realize that HANDGUNS were originally included in the NFA of ’34 but were removed due to public pressure. All sorts of quirky provisions aimed at preventing you from converting a rifle into a handgun remained in the bill and became law.

Also, much of the law was aimed specifically at the Thompson Sub Machine gun and its unconventional 10” barrel and removable butt stock. The so called “Gangster Weapons” were targeted because they were short enough to be concealed under a rain coat. Therefore, guns with removable butt stocks were outlawed because it made them more concealable. The funny thing is, adding the forbidden removable butt stock to a pistol makes it much more difficult to conceal and any potential gain in long range accuracy is pretty much moot at “bank robbery” distances. Again, the original bill outlawed ANY firearm shorter than 26” (or 27”for a shotgun) But you can bet that many bureaucrats in the BATF never met a gun law that they did not like and these quirky regulations will not only remain, but will be enforced to the fullest extent, even if they make no logical sense in a country where you can still legaly buy a handgun.

Perhaps the Special Agent assigned to monitor this forum could expand on this... or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top