B.FRANKlin
member
- Joined
- May 8, 2005
- Messages
- 20
Vaccuum or not, a .50 BMG will go faster and farther than a .22lr. The .22 will be down before the .50 reaches the limit.
Zero is determined by the distance from the muzzle to the target. A rifle is usually sighted in at 100 yd.s. The gun is "zeroed" at 100yd.s. A .22 magnum can hit a 100 yd. target but the bullet will travel up to get there due to the arc caused by compensating for bullet drop (loss of energy).
Releasing a slide on an empty chamber should not hurt a pistol. The force should be less than, or same as slamming home from a fired bullet. Guns are designed to take it.
A large (.45) bullet hitting a stationary (man) definitely carries force with it. Imagine hitting a bumblebee on a bicycle at 10 mph. Now imagine the same only on a motorcycle at 60 mph. That bee could knock an unwary rider off the motorcycle, but not likely off a bicycle. The main difference is a bullet is nearly solid and is moving much faster (and weighs more). And getting wounded hurts a lot. A man hit with a .45 will, 99 times out of 100, be knocked down. (But not always.)
The guy that decided to reduce ammo to .223 had to be a damn liberal! ("Oh! That poor enemy. The (.308, .30'06) really messed him up!. We'll use smaller ammo so they don't get hurt so bad.") I wonder why the govt. is rebuilding (.308) M-14s with such haste? Could it be because they're BETTER?
(This will raise some hackles!) I think the Mini-14 would have been a better performer than the M-16! Colt "needed" the contract to stay in business and the govt. knuckled under to appease Colt. The historic, but going under, Colt firm was, thus, saved from extinction, and our soldiers hampered by a tempermental, over-complicated club.
Zero is determined by the distance from the muzzle to the target. A rifle is usually sighted in at 100 yd.s. The gun is "zeroed" at 100yd.s. A .22 magnum can hit a 100 yd. target but the bullet will travel up to get there due to the arc caused by compensating for bullet drop (loss of energy).
Releasing a slide on an empty chamber should not hurt a pistol. The force should be less than, or same as slamming home from a fired bullet. Guns are designed to take it.
A large (.45) bullet hitting a stationary (man) definitely carries force with it. Imagine hitting a bumblebee on a bicycle at 10 mph. Now imagine the same only on a motorcycle at 60 mph. That bee could knock an unwary rider off the motorcycle, but not likely off a bicycle. The main difference is a bullet is nearly solid and is moving much faster (and weighs more). And getting wounded hurts a lot. A man hit with a .45 will, 99 times out of 100, be knocked down. (But not always.)
The guy that decided to reduce ammo to .223 had to be a damn liberal! ("Oh! That poor enemy. The (.308, .30'06) really messed him up!. We'll use smaller ammo so they don't get hurt so bad.") I wonder why the govt. is rebuilding (.308) M-14s with such haste? Could it be because they're BETTER?
(This will raise some hackles!) I think the Mini-14 would have been a better performer than the M-16! Colt "needed" the contract to stay in business and the govt. knuckled under to appease Colt. The historic, but going under, Colt firm was, thus, saved from extinction, and our soldiers hampered by a tempermental, over-complicated club.