Gun owners are now 'insurrectionists'

[Dave Workman]

Suddenly, gun rights activists are "insurrectionists"

Seattle Gun Rights Examiner reminds anti-gun authors that this is a nation of insurrectionists

http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seat...ists-are-now-insurrectionists-say-antigunners

If that doesn't work, try this:

http://tinyurl.com/kkn94q

 

[TexasRifleman]

Guess I need a t-shirt with "Insurrectionist" on the front.

Who is gonna put together a group buy?

But as mentioned, we're pretty much a nation founded on that, so I'm proud to be one.

The entire point of the Second Amendment is to allow for violent insurrection by citizens should the government go off the reservation.

Nice article, thanks for the link.

 

[Birdmang]

That was a great article. The end about Tehran was golden.

 

[ezypikns]

Mr. Workman's Comments are Spot On

And I believe gun owners are the most law abiding and responsible folks in the U.S.A.

 

[Shung]

Guess I need a t-shirt with "Insurrectionist" on the front

idea of the year

"ordered liberty" ... some people really seem not to understand a damn thin from past and History..

 

[NWGunner]

Spot on, Mr. Workman. Well done. I find it ironic that the very people they attempt to demonize are directly responsible for defending their freedom to express themselves in print.

 

[GEM]

Interesting - the NY Times had an editorial by Bob Herbert stating that the defense against tyranny argument was for nuts.

Then, they had an piece by Thomas Friedman that the insurrection or whatever in Iraq will fail as the populace is unarmed. He stated that Tweet-tweet (twitter) can't match bang-bang.

In a sad sense - the Iranian situation washes away that attack by the antis.

 

[KarenTOC]

I used to have an uncle named Erwin. That name could become pretty popular among gun-enthusiasts now

extreme right wing insurrectionist.

 

[TexasRifleman]

am tired of being "framed" by "writers" as being a "part" of an "insurrection".

You were originally framed that way by the Department of Homeland Security, the media is just riding along behind it.

Be mad at Napolitano.

The ones that won the election "fair and square" are not dealing with you in the same manner.

 

[Blakenzy]

What's the difference between an "insurrectionist" and an "insurgent"?

 

[Shung]

What's the difference between an "insurrectionist" and an "insurgent"?

the latter is already shooting..

 

[eqfan592]

Wow, too hell with THAT guy! Thanks for the link. I'm gonna watch for this crap now (as if I wasn't already, but still).

 

[46R]

Hmmm, I wonder how well the likes of Horowitz and his ilk could withstand several tens of thousands of individual defamation of character suits filed against him in multitudes of courts scattered all across the nation for publishing such inflammatory rubbish about law abiding citizens?


Oh, and by the way after reading that list of historical "insurrectionists" it seems to me that although he didn't sign the DoI, there's a rather prominent feller from Virginia, first name of George, who kinda fits in with that crowd too, and might ought to be included, though I understand he was busy taking care of some urgent business out of town, up in New York, the day the DoI was signed in Philly... or something like that.

 

[eqfan592]

Wow, just reading the intro about the book shows that these guys CLEARLY never read a SINGLE WORD written by the founding fathers of this nation (outside of a quick glance at the constitution I'm sure. No need to give it any more thought than that of course!). And right in the FIRST SENTANCE they promote the idea that gun ownership is directly related to violence, when every single fair minded study of the information shows that there is NO connection between gun ownership and VIOLANT CRIMES. THAT is the real stat that gets buried every time the anti's bring up this issue.

GAH, now I'm really PO'ed.

EDIT: I mean come on! There's logical fallicies in the DISCRIPTION?? How can people be so damn blind to this!

Ok, i'm done ranting. sorry.

 

[BHP FAN]

I am as mad as HECK and I am NOT taking it anymore
I try to be respectful and calm here in internet land, but this is the last straw.
I am not not not not not not NOT NOT an insurrectionist, and NEITHER ARE YOU.

I am not breaking any laws, and neither are you. I love my country and believe it or not I love our government, I think it is a work of genius by our founders.

Insurrection is the act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.

I am not in revolt against my government, either open revolt or hidden revolt.
My candidate was beaten FAIR AND SQUARE in an OPEN FREE ELECTION.
My fellow countrymen SPOKE and they WON.

I do not agree with our current leadership's ideas, but I am praying every day that God will give them wisdom.

I am tired of being "framed" by "writers" as being a "part" of an "insurrection".


+ 1 more...

 

[bearmgc]

Yes. +1.

 

[danprkr]

I am afraid that the only time these guys may learn is when the tyrants come for their computers to stop their Freedom of Speech, and suddenly find themselves with us as their only protection. Then some of them MAY change their tune. Until then get used to being the bad guy, grow a thick skin, and make ready.

 

[daorhgih]

How about a group-buy on these?::

Red, or White cotton tee-shirt, imprinted.
(front, 7 LINES, centered)
U.S. CONSTITUTION /
AMENDMENT II /
A well-regulated Militia being necessary /
to the security of a Free State, /
the right of the People /
to keep and bear arms /
shall not be infringed.

(Rear, 2 lines, centered)
E R W I N
EXTREME RIGHT-WING INSURRECTION.
(& very fine print: I'm not a mall-ninja")

ANY BUYERS?? (will give royalty where royalty is due.)

((I posted the following one week ago on ano-THR site, but is was locked and blocked, as being "tin-hattery" and "TSIFalling rhetoric." I would GREATLY appreciate suggestions for editing it, and will certainly try to comply. It stands as written already on TFL.

You don't have to be guilty to be convicted, anymore. 2d Amendment Foes Tighten Their Nooses. So Be forewarned, Gun-owner; IT'S NOT political, and do not kid ourselves, gentlemen. THEY WANT ALL OF OUR GUNS. By one small millimeter at a time "they" will demonize the gun, marginalize the gun-owner, and make their move "to make the nation safer for all Americans" by removing the threats ( that's "Us".) The real threat to "them" is the 2d amendment, NOT just the gun it defends. The secondary threat to "them" is anyone who defends that amendment ( that's "Us") and owns a gun. Whether it be the "Automatic" (a demonizing word) that was used to assassinate a doctor, or the pre-ban, unregulated auto-loader (another set of demon words) .22 cal. long-gun that assassinated the guard in D.C., "they" want them all, and "they" want us. Us; they want you, and me. Wise up. What are you prepared to do? At 0300 the knock on your door may not be a neighbor asking for a cup of flour. When the hue-and-cry is "No guns for white supremacists", where will you be? Marginalized? When the hue-and-cry for "No guns for abortion opposers" heralds a new confiscation scheme, where will you stand? Marginalized a little bit more. It does not matter about how you really feel about those two particular causes, because the REAL, ROOT cause is "CONFISCATION": by any means. Demonize the gun; marginalize and label the gunowner; confiscate "For the good of society (or whatever.) The next major causal event will likely be closer to the bone, and very high up. "Homeland Security" high up. Don't say you were not forewarned. "They" will choreograph any scenario to suit them, in order to demonize the gun even further. The handwriting has been on the wall for a long time. Did you read it? It's never been LESS about Bambi.

 

[eqfan592]

Well here is the thing for me. While the Anti crowd gets under my skin, I actually think they are losing the battle. As we speak, even some of the most anti-gun politicians are recognizing that this issue is a political poison pill because, in spite of all their best efforts, the majority (even if it's a small majority) of people do NOT buy into their arguments. I actually think we have been making headway over the last few years, so I'm not nearly as doom and gloom as others are. Does this mean we can give up the fight now? NO! NOW is the time to REALLY hammer our point’s home in the mind of the public. NOW is the time to present them with the facts and to point out the logical inconsistencies in the anti's arguments.

Some of them may demonize us, but we have the facts on our side.

 

[Erik M]

so says the passive agressive anti-firearm journalist.

 

[Dave Workman]

so says the passive agressive anti-firearm journalist.
__________________

Erik M:
To whom are you referring?

 

[theotherwaldo]

So now WE are the ones that are bucking the Establishment!

-Just ran into some great quotes from Jefferson. A wishy-washy man but a great writer about rights:

"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

"I think myself that we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious."

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?"

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

-What was that about those that refuse to learn from history?

 

[Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow]

Who is gonna put together a group buy?

Im in! Pistachio Green?

 

[BHP FAN]

subdued OD,with black letters?

 

[Big_E]

I don't like being labeled "negative" things, but insurrectionist is not something I am offended by. Mainly because the 2nd amendment allows me to try and overthrow the government if they get out of whack. Am I going to overthrow the government now? No. But with the way things are heading, I will not hesitate when the time comes. However, I prefer to avoid the violence and use voting to try and fix the problems. But Iran is a good example when the head hanchos make voting futile, so when votes become meaningless, then a little metal and gunpowder will do my voting for me.