Guns do "just go off"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also reminds me of why you leave the cylinder under the hammer on a revolver empty.

Only on old SAA's or three-screw Rugers and their ilk.

Leaving an empty chamber under the hammer of a modern DA wheelgun crosses the line from prudence into superstitious paranoia. :uhoh:
 
This is why I like Glocks.

They don't CONTAIN enough energy to fire a primer of their own accord, in any condition (including 'cocked'.)

YOU HAVE TO PULL THE TRIGGER, OR IT WON'T GO OFF.

No malfunction could make the gun go off, because at the absolute worst the malfunction would cause the part-cocked striker to fall on the primer. Result = NOTHING HAPPENS!


Now, other stuff than your finger can pull the trigger (though it's hard with the trigger-mounted safety. Has to be a very clever stick.)

So, if it was a Glock, then this guy MUST have mis-handled it somehow for it to go boom.

PS: remind me to stay away from cheap .32s (or any fully-cockable gun with questionable mechanics/sear-wear, both in design and in the specific model.)
 
I'm betting that it just didn't "go off". Negligence in securing it in a proper holster or case means that this is most likely an ND.
 
But most LEO types use DA or DAO guns where I would think the hammer is resting and the trigger pull too much to just get pulled in a bag...

The factory trigger pull on a glock is SIGNIFICANTLY less than that on a traditional DA/SA or DAO pistol. The thing with Glocks though is that you really do have to PULL THE TRIGGER for them to fire. Even with the worst kind of mechanical malfuntion there isnt enough energy in the "half-cocked" stryker to dicharge a round. Also in order for the "safety trigger" to be pulled by something in the bag it would have to be done in such a way as to pull the little safety thingie on the trigger. Not an impossible thing by any means really.
 
Leaving an empty chamber under the hammer of a modern DA wheelgun crosses the line from prudence into superstitious paranoia.


I confess to being a revolver neophyte.

Do modern revolvers have a drop-safety for the exposed hammer? What's to prevent it from going off?

If so, I'd see absolutely no reason not to leave a revolver fully loaded.


If not, I don't chamber non-drop-safe weapons. (and that means I'll probally keep not owning any revolvers :p)




I really should know this. No time like the present to learn I guess!
 
artherd,

Do modern revolvers have a drop-safety for the exposed hammer?

Yes. Some brands have had that for quite some time, as a matter of fact. I think it was Iver Johnson that had their quasi-famous "Hammer the hammer" adverts in the early days of the previous century.

Some used transfer bars, and some use sliding hammer blocks, but either way, there's no way for the hammer to hit the firing pin on a modern (post WWII) DA revolver unless the trigger is pulled.
 
It was in fact Iver Johnson who first had the patent on the transfer bar and used it in its revolvers. Hence "hammer the Hammer" Score another one for Tamara. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top