Drizzt
Member
Guns offer false security
Wed Jun 11
Kimberly Shearer Palmer
Before I held a revolver, I thought only police officers and psychopaths shot guns. Guns seemed uncontrollable objects that could inflict death at any moment; I preferred to avoid them.
Then I learned how to shoot. My friends arranged a trip to a shooting range outside Chicago. Our instructor, a former police officer, taught us how to stand and point, hunching our shoulders for accuracy. We shot at the target silhouettes' heart and lungs before aiming for its head. In real life, our instructor explained, our attackers might wear bulletproof vests.
I was thrilled with my new power. A technological advantage now would let me fight the bad guys, even ones bigger and stronger that I am -- or so I thought. Guns give women equal killing ability, but they also draw us into the dangerous illusion that owning one makes us safe.
More women are using guns. The number of National Rifle Association Women on Target programs -- shooting clinics for women only -- more than doubled between 2001 and 2002, says Stephanie Henson, manager of the NRA's women's programs. Last year, clinics were held in 38 states. Henson says women's interest is so strong that the NRA recently launched Woman's Outlook, its first magazine aimed just at women.
Self-defense is the reason the overwhelming majority of Women & Guns' readers are interested in using guns, says Peggy Tartaro, the magazine's executive editor.
Not so equal
But gun popularity among women is based on two misconceptions. First, gun advocates often call guns the great equalizer between men and women. In reality, according to a new study by the University of California at Davis, women who own handguns are more than twice as likely to be murdered with a firearm by their partners than those who do not. While this may be partly explained by the fact that women who fear an attack are more apt to buy a gun, the study shows guns often fail to help women protect themselves.
''Having a gun gives women a false sense of security,'' says Naomi Seligman, communications director of the Violence Policy Center, a Washington non-profit that urges stricter gun control. ''Guns can be taken away, and women can be killed by their own guns.''
The second misconception is that guns are the only solution to help otherwise ''weak'' women protect themselves. In fact, a wide range of self-defense options, from chemical sprays to street fighting, gives women the tools to fight back.
Fight, don't shoot
A popular new form of self-defense training simulates attacks on the street and in the bedroom by male ''attackers'' wearing protective padding. This realistic-training approach includes verbal and psychological elements that prepare women for real-life situations. Fighting off a man in a simulated attack is much more likely to resemble a real incident than shooting at a target-range silhouette.
Self-defense classes also offer a significant psychological benefit. After taking self-defense courses with simulated attacks at The Empower Program Inc., a Washington non-profit, my younger sister and I felt more confident walking down the street. We were aware that at any time, anywhere, we knew how to fight back. The course also taught us how to avoid violent situations and how to de-escalate encounters before they become deadly. Like Jennifer Lopez's character in the 2002 movie Enough, in which she learns to fight to protect herself and her daughter against her abusive husband, we had reclaimed our right to feel safe while depending only on our own bodies.
Considering guns as women's only shot at self-defense is like eating fat-free cookies to ward off obesity; they can make the situation even worse. Instead of buying a gun, I'm sticking to basic street smarts that will always be there when I need them most.
Kimberly Shearer Palmer is a graduate student at the University of Chicago
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2003-06-10-palmer_x.htm
Wed Jun 11
Kimberly Shearer Palmer
Before I held a revolver, I thought only police officers and psychopaths shot guns. Guns seemed uncontrollable objects that could inflict death at any moment; I preferred to avoid them.
Then I learned how to shoot. My friends arranged a trip to a shooting range outside Chicago. Our instructor, a former police officer, taught us how to stand and point, hunching our shoulders for accuracy. We shot at the target silhouettes' heart and lungs before aiming for its head. In real life, our instructor explained, our attackers might wear bulletproof vests.
I was thrilled with my new power. A technological advantage now would let me fight the bad guys, even ones bigger and stronger that I am -- or so I thought. Guns give women equal killing ability, but they also draw us into the dangerous illusion that owning one makes us safe.
More women are using guns. The number of National Rifle Association Women on Target programs -- shooting clinics for women only -- more than doubled between 2001 and 2002, says Stephanie Henson, manager of the NRA's women's programs. Last year, clinics were held in 38 states. Henson says women's interest is so strong that the NRA recently launched Woman's Outlook, its first magazine aimed just at women.
Self-defense is the reason the overwhelming majority of Women & Guns' readers are interested in using guns, says Peggy Tartaro, the magazine's executive editor.
Not so equal
But gun popularity among women is based on two misconceptions. First, gun advocates often call guns the great equalizer between men and women. In reality, according to a new study by the University of California at Davis, women who own handguns are more than twice as likely to be murdered with a firearm by their partners than those who do not. While this may be partly explained by the fact that women who fear an attack are more apt to buy a gun, the study shows guns often fail to help women protect themselves.
''Having a gun gives women a false sense of security,'' says Naomi Seligman, communications director of the Violence Policy Center, a Washington non-profit that urges stricter gun control. ''Guns can be taken away, and women can be killed by their own guns.''
The second misconception is that guns are the only solution to help otherwise ''weak'' women protect themselves. In fact, a wide range of self-defense options, from chemical sprays to street fighting, gives women the tools to fight back.
Fight, don't shoot
A popular new form of self-defense training simulates attacks on the street and in the bedroom by male ''attackers'' wearing protective padding. This realistic-training approach includes verbal and psychological elements that prepare women for real-life situations. Fighting off a man in a simulated attack is much more likely to resemble a real incident than shooting at a target-range silhouette.
Self-defense classes also offer a significant psychological benefit. After taking self-defense courses with simulated attacks at The Empower Program Inc., a Washington non-profit, my younger sister and I felt more confident walking down the street. We were aware that at any time, anywhere, we knew how to fight back. The course also taught us how to avoid violent situations and how to de-escalate encounters before they become deadly. Like Jennifer Lopez's character in the 2002 movie Enough, in which she learns to fight to protect herself and her daughter against her abusive husband, we had reclaimed our right to feel safe while depending only on our own bodies.
Considering guns as women's only shot at self-defense is like eating fat-free cookies to ward off obesity; they can make the situation even worse. Instead of buying a gun, I'm sticking to basic street smarts that will always be there when I need them most.
Kimberly Shearer Palmer is a graduate student at the University of Chicago
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2003-06-10-palmer_x.htm
