Are you serious? So you forgo opprotunities if you cannot bring a gun with you?
Cornman ! If i wanted to drive to Alaska it would likely be to enjoy the hunting and fishing ! Having a firearm would be a requirement to do this ! so the only option is to either ship my guns to a FFL in alaska or bypass canandastan via air or water ! I would love to drive the Alcan route on a motorcycle ,but dont want to go unarmed ! Kevin
Exactly. The primary reasons for spending time in Alaska is for the outdoors. If I am going to be traveling, often in sparsely populated places, on a motorcycle, while visiting wilderness inhabited by big critters, and obviously as a tourist (traveling there in a vehicle with a different license plate, and likely other giveaways to the locals) then I want a firearm, and I want to be carrying a firearm. Canada interfers with that. Purchasing a handgun out of state is banned by federal law, so that is not a legal option once I arrive.
That means the only way to legaly have a firearm would be to ship it there, or to purchase a long arm once there.
Then there is the fact that Alaska allows anyone to carry freely with no permits necessary, yet it is a hassle to get a handgun into the state. Sure you can ship it to an FFL, and pay fees, and then retrieve it after taking much of the trip. Yet you can't have a firearm with you when you reach the border to Canada, and you can't have one on the trip through Canada. I would want to stop a lot and visit various places along the way. Having a firearm would be nice, but what do you do with it once you arrive to Canada? Ship it someplace else (another cost) or just not take one up to that point?
I would say a big draw to Alaska is the outdoors and the freedom. That extra hassle and reduced freedom by having to pass through Canada (or take an expensive boring ferry) on the way there is a big inconvenience.
Enough of an inconvenience that it is easier to find a wilderness in the lower 48 for that type of activity.
That simple inconvenience is the difference of a big expense on the trip, and extra steps, and formalities. It takes away from some of the reason to go there, or to go there often.
I am not alone on this, I know people that have wanted to take thier motorhomes or RVs to Canada and chose not to go because they couldn't bring thier firearms along through B.C. or had to take a very expensive ferry. The type of tourists that want to go to Alaska usualy want to do so for the outdoors and adventure. Those type of people often like having firearms, especialy when traveling long distances to a place to enjoy just that. A large part of the trip is not just the desitination, but the trip getting there, so it is as much the places before the Canadian border, the places within the Canadian borders, as well as Alaska.