Sean Dempsey
Member
In my continued search for the right handgun, I handled my first HK today while looking for a Sig.
I am trying to choose the best handgun for my wants, and I had though the Sig was it. Basically, I wanted a SA/DA with a de-cocker. I find out with the HK USP today, though, that they have those features AND thumb safety.
The price is comparable to a Sig, but the added thumb safety is very appealing to me. As I am handling it in the store, I remember here that someone recommended for my needs a gun with a decocker, but NO thumb safety, but they didn't say why.
So where I am looking to drop about 800 bucks on one of the HK USP's in the near future, I am wondering what the crowd here will say about these weapons, and their decocking/safety features and possible advantages and disadvantages. I know these guns come highly recommended and that HK is a trusted brand the world over, I'm more asking about the theory behind decocking, SA/DA, and a thumb safety, and why some are very FOR and very AGAINST such features.
Thanks
I am trying to choose the best handgun for my wants, and I had though the Sig was it. Basically, I wanted a SA/DA with a de-cocker. I find out with the HK USP today, though, that they have those features AND thumb safety.
The price is comparable to a Sig, but the added thumb safety is very appealing to me. As I am handling it in the store, I remember here that someone recommended for my needs a gun with a decocker, but NO thumb safety, but they didn't say why.
So where I am looking to drop about 800 bucks on one of the HK USP's in the near future, I am wondering what the crowd here will say about these weapons, and their decocking/safety features and possible advantages and disadvantages. I know these guns come highly recommended and that HK is a trusted brand the world over, I'm more asking about the theory behind decocking, SA/DA, and a thumb safety, and why some are very FOR and very AGAINST such features.
Thanks