Handloading for the Glock 42 - Part IV

[Artofgolf]

Art,
Those look awesome. I see them and I think drywall or wood boards, or...... but I'll get back to 380 soon.

Just tinkerin' around with some ideas, MstrEddy

After viewing some serious ballistic gel testing videos, I'm convinced that this particular bullet should be given consideration by 380 Auto owners.
I'll be finding the one that works best for me out of Wharfy

 

[Potatohead]

AoG,
Tater here.
Those bullets look really neat, and despite what some of you have no doubt been led to believe, by golly that matters! We all strive to do our job well, and look good while we're doing it- why should we expect anything less from our bullets?

Alas I say, if a purdy pill doth exist- I see no reason to shoot an ugly one!

Btw, this thread is like the Energizer Bunny!

 

[Artofgolf]

AoG, Tater here.

Hey Tater

They may seem pretty & look neat; I'm really interested in their performance.
After viewing several in-depth tests by different presenters, I'm of the opinion that this bullet might just be the ideal SD projectile for 380 Auto.

I'm also thinking that it would be a great bullet for a 9mm little laser +P from a carbine

Btw, this thread is like the Energizer Bunny!

Might be time to start Part V

 

[Potatohead]

Sounds like fun

 

[Mad Chemist]

While I agree that they look good for the .380. I still think that the 147gr GDHP under a near-nuclear charge of 3N38 is a pretty nasty load from a 9x19 carbine.