a few weeks ago an old friend came by to discuss why i carry. my mother wanted him to talk to me, since hes always been a father figure to me. he wasnt freaked out, but he did say that he wouldnt want me around his grandkids if i was armed. i told him that day when he left his grandson with me and my nephews/nieces sledding i was armed, and i carry every day.
he wasnt too pleased, and said that he doesnt want to be around any armed person if they arent LEO.
he said that because of our religion we are known as being non-violent and that a christian would never take up arms to defend themselves. i countered with 'yes, i wouldnt take up arms either, if i was under attack because of my religion. but every day senseless violent crimes are commited, which we are under obligation to protect ourselves against. martyrdom for your faith is one thing. martyrdom over someone who wants to hurt you because of how you look or for your wallet or dignity is not part of the equation.'
so i did some research and came across an article that some might say is contradictary. on one hand, the advice given is that its too risky to take up arms. but on the other hand, if you cant talk your way out of the situation or cant escape it, the advice is "you must take every step to ensure your safety". well thats exactly how i intend to handle an attack. if i cant defuse the situation by calmly talking it out, i'll run. the last line of defense is the weapon.
but the articles were written in the '80s so much of the data and evidence is antiquated. nowadays criminals are more likely to injure/kill even if you comply with their demands.
gives those ARMED soldiers the right to be here....in a crowded tourist district!"
