help picking a press

300 rounds per month

  • hornady ap progressive

    Votes: 14 41.2%
  • reading t7

    Votes: 20 58.8%

  • Total voters
    34
I understand your concern about squibs... but there is just as much chance of 'producing a squib' with a progressive
I've observed 3 squibs in my life. One was a .357 Mag load my dad made on a Rockchucker. First he'd ever had (or admitted to) but he's definitely starting to slip in various life functions when attention to detail is required.

Another at a match, when the guy was loading ammo at the last minute. 9mm loaded on a Dillon 650 with no powder cop or low charge indicator.

3rd was my own. 9mm, Entirely my fault, on my LNL AP. Had loose powder in the tray with finished rounds. Found the round missing the primer and primed it. No way of knowing how much powder fell out, but thought I'd try it and see if it worked. Yes, by that time it was a controlled experiment since I knew exactly which round was faulty. (Hint, pulling a bullet is definitely easier than unsticking one from a barrel).

Point being, paying attention is pretty important.
 
I'd consider the T-7 to be manually indexed/advanced. IMHO, the T-7 has more of a 'single-stage, visually open' vibe than a 550, even if both are manually indexed/advanced.

RCIV and LNL-AP here. Blue's comments in post 39 reflect my usage.

One common misconception I had pre-purchase was that you have to (or really should) use it in full-on, all stations filled, ~progressive~ mode.

Nope!

My LNL-AP has been used repeatedly to batch process with 'open' stages due simply to it's auto-advance feature which negates the need to manually remove each case from the press. That, and doing 2, 3, or more things at once is far faster than 'just 1' and easier to keep tabs on than doing 5,6,7,

For my usage, and with an RCIV on my bench already, the auto-advance feature of the LNL-AP tips the scales in it's favor over the T-7, but,,,,,,,,,, Everyone's needs/values are different. I would add that if you like to tinker, a Progressive can be a lot of fun. If you despise ever making an adjustment, perhaps the T-7 might be more to your liking.
Okay I hear you, sounds like you know what you're comfortable with, but I was actually asking OP.
 
I remember when that thing was released... I seriously considered getting one. The 'no sale' part was the proprietary dies... I went with the ProJector instead.

How was it? My Brother and I went in 50/50 on our first one. I still have it and the other one we bought so we never had to convert priming systems.

It's nuts to think about how much more than $130 it has cost them to support those machines, as long as I've had them. One of them has been shipped to them twice for refurbishment and the only thing I have paid for was shipping to them. Now I just email Gary with what I need and it shows up in a few days.

I like it, just don't understand how it works, from business perspective.
 
I like it, just don't understand how it works, from business perspective.

Actually, it's a very smart business model. If you buy a SquareDeal, for example, and get good service out of it, you are likely to upgrade/expand with Dillon products in the future. Dillon has a brand loyalty other manufacturers would die for... I call them the Dillon Moonies, and I don't mean that in a disparaging way. Much like HK Moonies, Glock Moonies, or any other brand that has rabid support for it's product.
 
I have a T-7 and have used for a long time which has left me thinking that I would like to have a loader that's faster. I like what I've read and seen regarding the Dillon 550c so that would be my recommendation.
 
9mm, 44 mag , 223 , 308 ,

300 rounds a month total or 300 rounds a month of each caliber?

300 rounds total I would get a good single stage and not worry about it. 300 rounds of each caliber (1200 rounds total) a month I would be looking more toward the progressive press. This pistol stuff will load fast on a progressive. I find the rifle stuff to be a pain to reload on a progressive due to the case lube. So with the rifle calibers I end up using a single stage.

But that's just me. Your mileage may vary
WB
 
How was it? My Brother and I went in 50/50 on our first one. I still have it and the other one we bought so we never had to convert priming systems.

It's nuts to think about how much more than $130 it has cost them to support those machines, as long as I've had them. One of them has been shipped to them twice for refurbishment and the only thing I have paid for was shipping to them. Now I just email Gary with what I need and it shows up in a few days.

I like it, just don't understand how it works, from business perspective.

Now you know why I don't get involved in "what press to buy" Just like brass cleaning

:)
But here in order. Lee Challenger single stage, Lee Classic Breech lock, Lee Classic Turret, Rcbs 2000 (sold it), Hornady Lnl AP
I don not need a lot of ammo but I do load a lot of calibers, the LCT is the easiest and cheapest to switch over calibers for me.

Dillons business model is not about reloading presses. They make great machine and charge enough up front to cover any repairs.

Reloading is a side line for them. They make money with government contracts and weapons systems!


1714324198585.jpeg
 
thanks for everyone's input I ordered an Hornady AP press this morning , I really did like the T7 but I think the Hornady will offer me room to grow if I start shooting more 9mm , the bulk of my ammo needs is 9mm
When you start setting it up and run into problems there are several of us that can walk you through any problems you may run into.
 
thanks for everyone's input I ordered an Hornady AP press this morning , I really did like the T7 but I think the Hornady will offer me room to grow if I start shooting more 9mm , the bulk of my ammo needs is 9mm
I've helped a couple of friends set up their Hornady LNL presses. Things I always recommend to improve your experience:

1. Inline Fabrication: Ultra Mount and Ergo Handle (Short)...I've also added other IF accessories, but they can wait
2. KMS (squared): UFO Reloading Press Light system
3. Braggin Rights Precision: Pawl Adjustment and Primer Slide Adjusting kits
 
Last edited:
If you are new and don't like the hobby of handloading, will be a reloader, and want to shoot. I will suggest a Hornady L&L. My reason is because you can set up all the dies on a plate and just change out the plate and alternate between cartridges. I suggest keeping your powder away from your press and alternate your powders one at a time. You don't want to put pistol powder in your rifle cases.

To let you know. I use an RCBS single stage Rockchucker press. I assemble mostly test loads and the time taken to adjust dies for 5-10-15 test loads each for a progressive is not worth it. Assembling 300 rounds is not impossible. I can have 3 trays of 100 and load them up.
 
The LNL was my first progressive, I still have it and load various calibers on it. I highly recommend the RCBS Lock Out Die, not the powder cop die. You should be visually verifying a powder drop but a lock out die can double check you. Some calibers became higher volume so I added an RL1100 for those. Have fun with the LNL and don’t forget the free bullets!
 
When I am not taking a medically-enforced leave from the bench, I can easily load 300 rounds a month using an RCBS Reloader Special press. After all, that's just 10 rounds per day.

If the OP wants a progressive press, that is up to him, but it is not necessary to incur the cost for that number of rounds.
 
goal of 300 rounds per month loaded
I say start with a single-stage press - new or used. If you go the volume route later, you'll still keep the single forever. I suggest a nice RCBS, Redding or Lee in that order. 300 rounds is a pleasant evenings or 2 of reloading. Don't over think this.... JIMHO
 
Last edited:
Yep, a Rockchucker that you will leave to your heirs. I can make 300 in a few hours and I am not fast OR skilled

I am a buy once, cry once guy. My original alternative was a Dillon 750 or the Rockchucker. Still have not bought a DIllon.
 
I bought a single stage C press first because it was cheap and what I could afford. However there‘s really no advantage from a learning stand point especially with the LNL. Put in one die and treat it like a single stage. When you finish that process swap out dies, easy to do with LNL, and do the next process. Then as you gain experience any combination is up to you. Single step, or resize and prime and expand, or resize and expand only w/ prime off press, powder on or off, then seat and crimp. Or any combination that makes sense to you. I resize all my 9mm in a single step mode so I can do chamber check and primer pocket exam. Put in all the dies and the reload in full progres mode.
 
I thought a lot about this a decade ago when I loaded 45 LC on a Lyman turret press a friend loaned me.

I am about to get back into reloading, and I will definitely go with a progressive - mostly because I think that I would have to be significantly more boneheaded to create a squib load or a double charge on a progressive press with a powder check die than on a single stage or turret press.

The way that I look at it, creating a squib or double charge on a progressive press with a powder check die is going to require mechanical errors with two mechanisms simultaneously - and a bit of stupidity on my part.

To do the same on a single stage or turret requires only a bit if stupidity on my part - there is no mechanism needs to fail.

When I was loading 45 LC on the Lyman, I had a flashlight and a protocol, and I used Trail Boss - or some other powder that was fluffy enough that a double charge was impossible - so I never had an issue.

But I would rather have the mechanical backup.
 
Back
Top