Heritage “Barkeep”

Status
Not open for further replies.

WestKentucky

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
13,122
Location
Western Kentucky
Seems Heritage has introduced a new offering in the Rough Rider series. A snubnose 22 plow handle gun that they are calling the “Barkeep”. With the gun being so short on barrel length it comes without ejector. Seems a silly model without ejector, but an interesting one yet. I stumbled across a couple color options on Gunbroker, and they look nice, but I’m not sure I would bite without provision for ejecting empties.
https://www.tactical-life.com/firearms/handguns/heritage-barkeep-revolver-single-action/
 
Seems Heritage has introduced a new offering in the Rough Rider series. A snubnose 22 plow handle gun that they are calling the “Barkeep”. With the gun being so short on barrel length it comes without ejector. Seems a silly model without ejector, but an interesting one yet. I stumbled across a couple color options on Gunbroker, and they look nice, but I’m not sure I would bite without provision for ejecting empties.
https://www.tactical-life.com/firearms/handguns/heritage-barkeep-revolver-single-action/
---
Shades of the I-J Cadet 55-SA
tps%3A%2F%2Fpicturearchive.gunauction.com%2F2017949%2F8480847%2F7ecd2410b8c2448b23a0ac0c77b72b40.jpg

Now the real question: which is more "tactical," the .38S&W or the .22WMRF?
 
I think it's utterly stupid but apparently there's a lot that plan on CCW and use it as a bedside gun too
 
It's nice to see them making more stuff, but it's all .22's and none of them are a 9 shot 3 inch birds head. Where are the .32's? Bring those back with adjustable sights, actually make a version of the .357 and .45 revolvers with adj. sights so you can actually shoot them.

I'd like to see the .410/.45 revolver brought back. Taurus axed that not soon after buying them, wonder why?

You know, if Heritage ever wanted to get into making double actions w/ the pull pin design like the H&R's use to have, I'd be down. I feel that style of revolve is more accurate than the traditional swing out cylinder given the alignment is based off the center pin and not a crane assembly, plus it's cheaper to make, less machine time and parts.

This tho, IDK what makes it worth owning over something else already out there.
 
They made it in .32 or .38, or even put a birdshead grip on it.... maybe make it double action too.... I'd buy one, even with my hatred of their safety and their absolutely pathetic quality and QC.
 
I think it's utterly stupid but apparently there's a lot that plan on CCW and use it as a bedside gun too

Could be a good dogwalking gun as well. At least in my area. Low to no crime. Need more for snakes or a strange acting critter. In the almost 27 years of living rural, I dispatched a few copperheads(garters and others get a pass) and a good handful of sickly animals.
 
They made it in .32 or .38, or even put a birdshead grip on it.... maybe make it double action too.... I'd buy one, even with my hatred of their safety and their absolutely pathetic quality and QC.


They did make a .32 H&R Mag at one time. They discontinued them the same way everyone else did. Really wish there was more support for that round ammo wise.
 
I'd like one in .32 H&R mag as well - it would be a cheaper option than the Model P Jr. (which I can't ever seem to find anyway). Offering an additional 32-20 cylinder with it would be even nicer!

Heck, I'd love to get one of the Big Bore models in .44 special! Back in 2012 (pre-Taurus buyout), they were even planning on releasing a "Judge" type in .45/.410... https://www.tactical-life.com/combat-handguns/heritage-manufacturing-revolver/ It seems that once Taurus bought Heritage, all the fun (and less mainstream) chamberings went away. So it goes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top