How Good is the 38 Special +P 158gr LSWCHP for SD

Status
Not open for further replies.
It just works... even in a snubby. Here is an expansion test from a S&W 637...
http://brasstard.com/?p=140
I have debated endlessly with myself between 125g JHP and 158g LSWC-HP... my observations have lead me to lean towards the 158g LSWC-HP. It just seems to hit harder coming from my snubby.
 
Anyone have any problem with the +P load in non +P rated J Frames?

In steel frames no.

I did have a Colt Cobra frame stretch though from periodic +P use. Not anywhere near what the factory specifactions said it could take. Colt took care of me.

I always shoot +P out of my K frames and no problems. The were suppoedly factory rated though I guess.
 
Anyone have any problem with the +P load in non +P rated J Frames?

The funny thing is that some standard loads are as hot or hotter as other +P loads. For example, it appears that Buffalo Bore's standard pressure 158g LSWCHP has slightly higher velocity than the Federal 158g+P LSWCHP. So, just because they call it +P doesn't necessarily mean that it is loaded all that hot.
 
I read somewhere that todays +P loads do not exceed the original pressure threshold for the .38 Special and that +P is a gimmick?
 
Just about every reputable companies' self defense rounds of modern technology will get 12 inches of penetration through heavy clothing - and in the most common calibers. .380 to .45

Technology has finally resolved its not what you shoot, but where you aim.
 
...I don't buy .357 ammo...the 158gr LSWCHP+P has been my defense round in all my .357s and .38s...2", 3", 4"...and I feel totally confident of the performance in each...I don't like the Magnum noise or recoil...
...if I were hunting, I'd not even consider the .38 round...or the .357 revolver...
 
I kinda like the idea of a 158gr SJHP at about 1100fps or so in a .357 myself....
 
Last edited:
This is the load my Department used prior to switching to Glocks and I still use it in all of my .38 spl revolvers.tom.:)
 
The FBI/Chicago/Metro load is indeed still a viable choice for SD/HD. I would not really worry if a new administration hired a retro-chief who made me carry this load for police duty. It works quite well when well-placed.
 
hinto03 said:
I read somewhere that todays +P loads do not exceed the original pressure threshold for the .38 Special and that +P is a gimmick?
Absolutely not! Pressures were reduced somewhat in some loads, but any .38 Spc round can be safely fired in any .38 Spc revolver. And yes, +P loads can be fired in steel guns like the S&W 60 .38, but don't think they can be used indefinitely without damage -- they will shoot loose, especially with lighter 95-110 JHP +P rounds.

sheepdog said:
...I don't buy .357 ammo...the 158gr LSWCHP+P has been my defense round in all my .357s and .38s...2", 3", 4"...and I feel totally confident of the performance in each...I don't like the Magnum noise or recoil....
I can understand your enthusiasm, but don't get carried away. I don't like the blast and recoil of the .44 mags, but I have no problems with the .357 125gr JHP, which really is substantially superior to the .38 Spc Treasury Load. In short, there's just no way the .38 load is in the same class as the .357 125gr JHP, especially in hunting. For indoor defense in an apartment or where muzzleflash might be a problem, the .38 load is fine. But if I'm Dennis Weaver in Duel, I'll take a .357 with a stout 125-158 JHP load. From its earliest days, the .357 has shown itself to be KING of the Road, and when I travel cross country, my Security-Six is loaded with hot magnum ammo, especially at rest stops at night.
 
when I travel cross country, my Security-Six is loaded with hot magnum ammo, especially at rest stops at night.

Amen Brother:) My 2.75" Six is loaded with doubletaps 158gr gold dot. That pistol has seen some miles since I picked up my PA and FL CC permits.
 
Each round in its respective power. No doubt the .38 load will deliver within its stated purpose, but the federal government walks a fine line between power and performance.

The .357 came into being between street shooting and shooting between vehicles. I've seen some .38 ammo (especially heavier bullets) that just bounce off rubber tires and even car bodies when fired from snubnosed barrels. It just doesn't happen with magnum loads, which tend to have mean barks and bites!
 
Confederate...

...I have no intention of getting carried away...which is why I use the best-rated .38 ammo I can find....;)
...I did point out that I wouldn't even consider it for hunting...you cut that part of the post out when you quoted...enjoy my part of the .357 Mags out there...hope you get your part in that movie...if I wanted to plan a battle, I'd buy .357, too...and shoot it in a Marlin rifle!!! I've heard you pick up 2-300fps in the long barrel and it would be just as controllable and easy to shoot as the .38 is in the revolver...it does have a place...in brush country it makes a fine deer round...I've been priviliged to eat some deer which found it out the hard way...:D
 
I just bought some of these rounds for my Rossi .38. My only concern, though, is of the leading they might leave. Has anyone has severe leading from this load? Also, what is the average velocity from a 2-3-inch barrel? Georgia Arms indicates 900 fps.

I have no intention of getting carried away...which is why I use the best-rated .38 ammo I can find.......I did point out that I wouldn't even consider it for hunting...you cut that part of the post out when you quoted...enjoy my part of the .357 Mags out there...hope you get your part in that movie...if I wanted to plan a battle, I'd buy .357, too...and shoot it in a Marlin rifle!!! I've heard you pick up 2-300fps in the long barrel and it would be just as controllable and easy to shoot as the .38 is in the revolver...it does have a place...in brush country it makes a fine deer round...I've been priviliged to eat some deer which found it out the hard way.
Understood. It's just that while I'd use them in some cases, I wouldn't exclusively carry them in other cases. The .357 is versatile enough to let one use almost anything. For people in certain circumstances, I'd use the 125gr JHP magnum loads (and not just for hunting)...but I get your point.
 
...I don't have any arthritis or wrist damage...I just don't like heavy recoil...I choose .45ACP and .44Spl. as my heaviest handgun cartridges...and the FBI load for my .38/.357s...that ain't knockin' you .357 guys, though...carried one for a lotta years....
 
I've chronographed recent "FBI loads" from 2", 2.5", 3", and 4" barrels.

This includes the Rem 38S12 and the Georgia Arms version factory ammo, and various handloads using 231, AA#5, Silhouette, True Blue, and other powders, in both 38 Special and 357 Magnum cases. Typically, these rounds were shot from a 640 (2&1/8" barrel), or from a 442, M&P 340, or S&W Airweight 360 (1&7/8" barrels.), and a minimum of ten rounds per chrono test was done for statistical validity. Both the Georgia Arms (which I believe uses the Hornady 158LSWC-HP) and the Rem 38S12 will barely break 800 fps now, and maybe run at about 790 fps.

For reloaders, the "best" powder I've found for a faster "FBI load" round is Ramshot's True Blue--loaded to 38-CIP (European) pressure (<=21,750), it will do about 860+ fps on a warmer day. AA#5 is also a good powder.

IMO, any 158-gr. bullet running over 820-830 fps in a 38 Special case from a 2" barrel is running over 38+P Pressures. Don't forget that '70s "FBI load" was just over the-then standard of 38+P, not today's, and that it would clock perhaps 850-870 FPS when shot from a 2.5" or 3" barrel. And, if you run the LSWC-HP swaged bullets (Hornady or Speer) much over 900 fps, the leading and even stripping becomes a real issue.

AFAICT, a neat 357 Magnum factory round not available would run a 158LSWC-HP at just over 900 fps from a 2" barrel. I build those routinely; that's about the max load I want to shoot from a j-frame lightweight, reload, and shoot another cylinderful. From a steel frame (the 640), it's a well-balanced round.

Jim H.
 
Last edited:
I have no faith in the 125 grainers out of either a .38 or a .357 Mag. Guys have gotten a lot bigger all around in the past few decades. I've seen a shooting from up in Fairbanks where the little .357 pill shot square in the middle of a fella just skittered around in his belly, doing no substantial damage at all. They don't penetrate enough and they're just not heavy enough anymore. 158 is a minimum for self defense and 180 a minimum for hunting.

Same true of .357 loads? That is...are y'all recommending the 58 LSWCHP in .357 as well?

You might start running into overexpansion and fragmentation at too high a velocity with pure soft lead, but it would be an interesting experiment.
 
jfh said:
This includes...the Georgia Arms version factory ammo, and various handloads.... ... Both the Georgia Arms (which I believe uses the Hornady 158LSWC-HP) and the Rem 38S12 will barely break 800 fps now, and maybe run at about 790 fps.
Hmmm...Georgia Arms advertises 900 fps, but I guess that's from a standard concrete-encased 15-inch test barrel! In such a load, I worry about leading in my own guns. With heavy bullets like the 158gr, one doesn't have the gas cutting issues of the 95-110gr bullets that Treasury also has used in the past. The lighter bullet loads could destroy a small-frame revolver quicker than the heavier loads, though frame stretching might be a problem if the pressure was pushed.

All my .38 Spc defense loads have been 110 JHP +P, just because I grew up thinking heavy bullets just didn't work well in the human body. Getting anywhere near 800 fps with lead bullets also guaranteed me a night or two home alone with my gun and a stainless steel brush.

Cosmoline said:
I have no faith in the 125 grainers out of either a .38 or a .357 Mag. Guys have gotten a lot bigger all around in the past few decades.
Can you supply more info? I'm frankly aghast, as the .357 125gr JHP has been a proven performer for several decades. Unless that chubby fellow's name was Ben, I can't help but think it was a freak shot. What was the load, exactly?

I had a friend who shot a Moro in the chest in World War II and he cursed the .45 ACP the rest of his life. Logically, he knew that sometimes freakish things happen with handguns, especially those fat 230gr FMJ -- but because that one gun and one round failed him that one time, he wrote off the entire caliber.

I know of many incidents where people (some of them huge) have gone down like a brick with the 125gr JHP. The CHP went from the 158gr JHP to the 125gr JHP because the heavier bullets tended to penetrate too well and recoil too much. The 158gr JHP .357 just hasn't had a decent track record with people. With bears and deer, yes, but I don't think people are getting so big that we need to go to that loading!

The 125gr JHP .357 penetrates exceptionally well in wood, plastic, car bodies, tires and so forth, yet breaks bones and mushrooms nicely when it hits human flesh. It's possible that the load that failed had a defective bullet or it had been altered. I wouldn't throw it to the wolves just yet, at least not without seeing more.

The 158gr LSWCHP isn't going to overpenetrate, probably because the velocity won't give it the energy. It may yet expand because there's no jacket holding it together. So we know it works in people. How does it work against cars and other materials from a 2-inch barrel? Will it flatten a tire?

One Final Note: A poster known as sacamp tested the Georgia Arms 158 LSWCHP and found it to be wanting. Let the buyer beware.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top