Guys, I really appreciate the feedback from everyone. I understand this is a very large issue that is also an individual one. Basically, I am satisfied with what I have decided: more vigorous patrols correlated with the hunting seasons, no trespassing signs, and better control of my dog(s). So as you can see I think a bit of tightening-up on both ends is in order here. Again, I am not trying to justify my situation to anyone. I am glad for everyone who both pointed out certain errors in my logic and gave sound advice.
I prefer to have the deer. A dog is just an animal like any other. They aren't any more special than a chicken, opossum, yak, bison or cat. Anyone who places a dogs life on some form of parity with a person has some SERIOUS mental health issues that require professional help.
Javelin, I think that's a loaded statement. Even the most unattached, emotionally cold person must acknowledge that a dog is someone else's property. A dog fulfills certain duties...companion, watch dog, and perhaps even a seeing-eye or assistance role.
Now, I agree that all things being equal, an animal is an animal. But shooting a deer in the wild and shooting an animal which is at the very least
someone's property (and at most, perhaps someone's closest companion) are different things. I acknowledge that in some situations it may be the only option - repeated raids on your livestock, or invading your property or hunting grounds with unrestrained intent.
However, you are really tilting the issue when you a) allege that someone (other than PETA freaks) puts dogs on the level of human life, and b) allege that killing a dog is
just like killing any other animal, period.
Good day.