Inexpensive and cheap are not the same thing
Guns with dings and dents, you can hunt hard and not worry too much about.
Don't care what a person shoots, as long as they shoot it well.
Have heard many folks try to equate their lesser rigs to pretty standard known good target stuff.
Laughable.
No, your Romanian trainer .22 is not going to hang with an Anschutz BR50.
But if you're putting squirrels in the pot regularly, do you need that higher evel of performance?
There certainly is "good enough".
Yeah, I know guys with the $$$$$ rigs, that never shoot them. There are weirdos across the spectrum.
Like the guys who talk about how good their lesser stuff is...........and they never show up at a match. If it really was as good as they said.............they'd be whipping our arses.
Shooting isn't cheap. If one could get fantastic performance for low expense, we'd all jump on it as that would allow even more shooting.
There is however, a fair bit of truth to "get what you pay for".
Started out with decent stuff. Tried a lot of others over the years.
Was fun, but wasn't cheap.
Am content to run what works.
Never subscribed the any gun magazine, or what fuels them..........advertising........not a slave to needing the latest and greatest.
My buddy has a Mathews Heli M bow. Said he's getting the new Halon.
LOL, I run a skeleton Blackwidow recurve made in 1972.
Have had new ones custom built, but for what I do...........this one works fine.
Plus as a kid I always wanted one.
If it works for ya, and keeps it fun...............that's good enough. Just be realistic in what its performance really is.
I'd rather buy nicer guns, and drive beater trucks
Don't give a flip about trying to impress anybody.
I love to shoot and hunt, so that's where I focus my time/energy/funds.
If I was smart, I'd have been clipped at age 16 and have a couple of big safes full of nicer stuff............rather than have 3 kids in college next year.
Yup, I like nice guns a lot. Just don't have a lot of them